Space and time in perceptual causality

Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Volumn 4, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Straube, Benjamin ^a,b   Chatterjee, Anjan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b PHILIPPS UNIVERSITY MARBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Expectation; fMRI; Perception of causality; Spatial continuity; Temporal contiguity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BASAL GANGLION; BEHAVIORISM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MENTAL TASK; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PARIETAL CORTEX; PARTICIPANT OBSERVATION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISCRIMINATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 77955389469     PISSN: 16625161     EISSN: 16625161     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2010.00028     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., Kramer, A. F., Liang, Z. P., Wright, A., Shenker, J., and Magin, R. (2000). fMri studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 12, 988-1000.
2. Beasley, N. A. (1968). The extent of individual differences in the perception of causality. Can. J. Psychol. 22, 399-407.
3. Billino, J., Braun, D. I., Böhm, K.-D., Bremmer, F., and Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2009). Cortical networks for motion processing: effects of focal brain lesions on perception of different motion types. Neuropsychologia 47, 2133-2144.
4. Blakemore, S. J., Boyer, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Meltzoff, A., Segebarth, C., and Decety, J. (2003). The detection of contingency and animacy from simple animations in the human brain. Cereb. Cortex 13, 837-844.
5. Blakemore, S. J., Fonlupt, P., Pachot-Clouard, M., Darmon, C., Boyer, P., Meltzoff, A. N., Segebarth, C., and Decety, J. (2001). How the brain perceives causality: an event-related fMRI study. Neuroreport 12, 3741-3746.
6. Buschman, T. J., and Miller, E. K. (2007). Top-down versus bottom-up control of attention in the prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices. Science 315, 1860-1862.
7. Coull, J., and Nobre, A. C. (2008). Dissociating explicit timing from temporal expectation with fMRI. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 137-144.
8. Eickhoff, S. B., Paus, T., Caspers, S., Grosbras, M. H., Evans, A. C., Zilles, K., and Amunts, K. (2007). Assignment of functional activations to probabilistic cytoarchitectonic areas revisited. Neuroimage 36, 511-521.
9. Fonlupt, P. (2003). Perception and judgement of physical causality involve different brain structures. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 17, 248-254.
10. Fugelsang, J. A., Roser, M. E., Corballis, P. M., Gazzaniga, M. S., and Dunbar, K. N. (2005).Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 24, 41-47.
11. Gemelli, A., and Cappellini, A. (1958). The influence of the subject's attitude in perception. Acta Psychol. 14, 12-23.
12. Gruber, H. E., Fink, C. D., and Damm, V. (1957). Effects of experience on the perception of causality. J. Exp. Psychol. 53, 89-93.
13. Guski, R., and Troje, N. F. (2003). Audiovisual phenomenal causality. Percept. Psychophys. 65,789-800.
14. Hosmer, D. W., and Lemeshow, S. (1989). Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.
15. Hume, D. (1740/1960). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon.
16. Hume, D. (1748/1977). An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett.
17. Keehner, M. Guerin, S. Miller, M. Turk, D., and Hegarty, M. (2006). Modulation of neural activity by angle of rotation during imagined spatial transformations. Neuroimage 33, 391-398.
18. Leslie, A. M. (1982). The perception of causality in infants. Perception 11, 173-186.
19. Leslie, A. M., and Keeble, S. (1987). Do sixmonth-old infants perceive causality? Cognition 25, 265-288.
20. Lewis, P. A., and Miall, R. C. (2003). Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 250-255.
21. Meck, W. H., Penney, T. B., and Pouthas, V. (2008). Cortico-striatal representation of time in animals and humans. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 18, 145-152.
22. Michotte, A. E. (1946/1963). The Perception of Causality (Translated by T. R. Miles and E. Miles). London: Methuen (Original published in 1946).
23. Natale, E., Marzi, C. A., and Macaluso, E. (2009). FMRI correlates of visuospatial reorienting investigated with an attention shifting double-cue paradigm. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 2367-2381.
24. Oakes, L. M., and Cohen, L. B. (1990). Infant perception of a causal event. Cogn. Dev. 5, 193-207.
25. Powesland, P. F. (1959). The effect of practice upon the perception of causality. Can. J. Psychol. 13, 155-168.
26. Roser, M. E., Fugelsang, J. A., Dunbar, K. N., Corballis, P. M., and Gazzaniga, M. S. (2005). Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. Neuropsychology 19, 591-602.
27. Schlottmann, A., and Anderson, N. H. (1993). An information integration approach to phenomenal causality. Mem. Cogn. 21, 785-801.
28. Schlottmann, A., Ray, E., Mitchell, A., and Demetriou, N. (2006). Perceived physical and social causality in animated motions: spontaneous reports and ratings. Acta Psychol. 123, 112-143.
29. Schlottmann, A., and Shanks, D. R. (1992). Evidence for a distinction between judged and perceived causality. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. A 44, 321-342.
30. Scholl, B. J., and Tremoulet, P. (2000). Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cogn. Sci. 4, 299-309.
31. Shulman, G. L., Ollinger, J. M., Akbudak, E., Conturo, T. E., Snyder, A. Z., Petersen, S. E., and Corbetta, M. (1999). Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects. J. Neurosci. 19, 9480-9496.
32. Thomsen, T., Specht, K., Ersland, L., and Hugdahl, K. (2005). Processing of conflicting cues in an attention-shift paradigm studied with fMRI. Neurosci. Lett. 380, 138-142.
33. Wagemans, J., van Lier, R., and Scholl, B. J. (2006). Michotte's heritage in perception and cognition research. Acta. Psychol. 123, 1-19.
34. Wolpert, L. (2006). Six Impossible Things Before Breakfast. London: Faber & Faber.
35. Wolpert, L. (2009). Cognition: evolution does help to explain how minds work. Nature 459, 506.
36. Wu, D., Morganti, A., and Chatterjee, A. (2008). Neural substrates of processing path and manner information of moving event. Neuropsychologia 46, 704-713.
37. Zacks, J. M. (2004). Using movement and intentions to understand simple events. Cogn. Sci. 28, 979-1008.
38. Zacks, J. M., Braver, T. S., Sheridan, M. A., Donaldson, D. I., Snyder, A. Z., Ollinger, J. M., Buckner, R. L., and Raichle, M. E. (2001). Human brain activity time-locked to perceptual event boundaries. Nat. Neurosci. 4, 651-655.
39. Zacks, J. M., Swallow, K. M., Vettel, J. M., and McAvoy, M. P. (2006). Visual motion and the neural correlates of event perception. Brain Res. 1076, 150-162.