Real-time monitoring of auxin vesicular exocytotic efflux from single plant protoplasts by amperometry at microelectrodes decorated with nanowires

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 53, Issue 10, 2014, Pages 2643-2647

  Liu, Jun Tao ^a   Hu, Liang Sheng ^b   Liu, Yan Ling ^a   Chen, Rong Sheng ^b   Cheng, Zhi ^a   Chen, Shi Jing ^a   Amatore, Christian ^c   Huang, Wei Hua ^a   Huo, Kai Fu ^d  

^a WUHAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b WUHAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^c ECOLE NORMALE SUPÉRIEURE   (France)

^d HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

amperometric monitoring; auxin efflux; electrochemical sensors; exocytosis; single plant cells

Indexed keywords

AMPEROMETRIC; AMPEROMETRY; AUXIN EFFLUX; DIRECT DETECTION; EXOCYTOSIS; HIGH SENSITIVITY; REAL TIME MONITORING; SINGLE PLANTS;

CYTOLOGY; MICROELECTRODES; NANOWIRES; PLANT CELL CULTURE; PLANTS (BOTANY); TITANIUM CARBIDE;

ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS;

CARBON; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE; NANOWIRE; PLATINUM; PROTON; TITANIUM;

AMPEROMETRIC MONITORING; ARTICLE; AUXIN EFFLUX; CHEMISTRY; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS; EXOCYTOSIS; MICROELECTRODE; PARTICLE SIZE; PLANT; SINGLE PLANT CELLS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIME;

AMPEROMETRIC MONITORING; AUXIN EFFLUX; ELECTROCHEMICAL SENSORS; EXOCYTOSIS; SINGLE PLANT CELLS;

CARBON; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; EXOCYTOSIS; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; MICROELECTRODES; NANOWIRES; PARTICLE SIZE; PLANTS; PLATINUM; PROTONS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS; TITANIUM;

EID: 84897672541     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201308972     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. R. D. Burgoyne, A. Morgan, Physiol. Rev. 2003, 83, 581-632
2. T. C. Südhof, J. Rizo, Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3, a 005637. Note that the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2013 was recently awarded to J. E. Rothman, R. W. Schekman, and T. C. Südhof for their discovery of the machineries regulating vesicle traffic in cells.
3. E. D. Gundelfinger, M. M. Kessels, B. Qualmann, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4, 127-139
4. V. Haucke, E. Neher, S. J. Sigrist, Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2011, 12, 127-138.
5. L. He, L. G. Wu, Trends Neurosci. 2007, 30, 447-455.
6. R. M. Wightman, J. A. Jankowski, R. T. Kennedy, K. T. Kawagoe, T. J. Schroeder, D. J. Leszczyszyn, J. A. Near, E. J. Diliberto, Jr., O. H. Viveros, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 10754-10758
7. E. V. Mosharov, D. Sulzer, Nat. Methods 2005, 2, 651-658
8. A. Schulte, W. Schuhmann, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 8914-8933
9. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8760-8777
10. C. Amatore, S. Arbault, M. Guille, F. Lemaitre, Chem. Rev. 2008, 108, 2585-2621
11. Y. X. Huang, D. Cai, P. Chen, Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 4393-4406
12. R. Trouillon, M. K. Passarelli, J. Wang, M. E. Kurczy, A. G. Ewing, Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 522-542.
13. R. G. W. Staal, E. V. Mosharov, D. Sulzer, Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 341-346
14. R. M. Wightman, C. L. Haynes, Nat. Neurosci. 2004, 7, 321-322.
15. H. G. Sudibya, J. M. Ma, X. C. Dong, S. Ng, L. J. Li, X. W. Liu, P. Chen, Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 2761-2764
16. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2723-2726
17. K. L. Adams, B. K. Jena, S. J. Percival, B. Zhang, Anal. Chem. 2011, 83, 920-927
18. A. Meunier, O. Jouannot, R. Fulcrand, I. Fanget, M. Bretou, E. Karatekin, S. Arbault, M. Guille, F. Darchen, F. Lemaître, C. Amatore, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123, 5187-5190
19. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 5081-5084
20. C. X. Guo, S. R. Ng, S. Y. Khoo, X. T. Zheng, P. Chen, C. M. Li, Acs Nano 2012, 6, 6944-6951
21. X. L. Lu, H. J. Cheng, P. C. Huang, L. F. Yang, P. Yu, L. Q. Mao, Anal. Chem. 2013, 85, 4007-4013.
22. A. W. Woodward, B. Bartel, Ann. Bot. 2005, 95, 707-735
23. S. Vanneste, J. Friml, Cell 2009, 136, 1005-1016.
24. W. D. Teale, I. A. Paponov, K. Palme, Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7, 847-859
25. F. Santos, W. Teale, C. Fleck, M. Volpers, B. Ruperti, K. Palme, Plant Biol. 2010, 12, 3-14
26. J. Dettmer, J. Friml, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23, 686-696.
27. E. Zažimalová, P. Křeček, P. Skupa, K. Hoyerová, J. Petrášek, Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2007, 64, 1621-1637.
28. N. Geldner, J. Friml, Y. D. Stierhof, G. Jurgens, K. Palme, Nature 2001, 413, 425-428
29. J. Friml, K. Palme, Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 49, 273-284
30. G. K. Muday, W. A. Peer, A. S. Murphy, Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 301-304
31. G. Li, H. W. Xue, Plant Cell 2007, 19, 281-295.
32. X. H. Wang, Y. Teng, Q. L. Wang, X. J. Li, X. Y. Sheng, M. Z. Zheng, J. Samaj, F. Baluska, J. X. Lin, Plant Physiol. 2006, 141, 1591-1603
33. K. Toyooka, Y. Goto, S. Asatsuma, M. Koizumi, T. Mitsui, K. Matsuoka, Plant Cell 2009, 21, 1212-1229.
34. G. Thiel, N. Battey, Plant Mol. Biol. 1998, 38, 111-125
35. R. Weise, M. Kreft, R. Zorec, U. Homann, G. Thiel, J. Membr. Biol. 2000, 174, 15-20
36. V. Bandmann, M. Kreft, U. Homann, Mol.Plant 2011, 4, 241-251.
37. T. Hu, G. Dryhurst, J. Electroanal. Chem. 1993, 362, 237-248
38. K. Wu, Y. Sun, S. Hu, Sens. Actuators B 2003, 96, 658-662
39. Y. Yardbox drawings light down and leftm, M. E. Erez, Electroanalysis 2011, 23, 667-673
40. J. Bulíčková, R. Sokolová, S. Giannarelli, B. Muscatello, Electroanalysis 2013, 25, 303-307
41. E. S. McLamore, A. Diggs, P. C. Marzal, J. Shi, J. J. Blakeslee, W. A. Peer, A. S. Murphy, D. M. Porterfield, Plant J. 2010, 63, 1004-1016.
42. L. S. Hu, K. F. Huo, R. S. Chen, X. M. Zhang, J. J. Fu, P. K. Chu, Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6828-6830
43. R. S. Chen, L. S. Hu, K. F. Huo, J. J. Fu, H. W. Ni, Y. Tang, P. K. Chu, Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 14552-14558
44. L. M. Li, X. Y. Wang, L. S. Hu, R. S. Chen, Y. Huang, S. J. Chen, W. H. Huang, K. F. Huo, P. K. Chu, Lab Chip 2012, 12, 4249-4256.
45. F. Y. Du, W. H. Huang, Y. X. Shi, Z. L. Wang, J. K. Cheng, Biosens. Bioelectron. 2008, 24, 415-421.
46. R. A. de Toledo, C. M. P. Vaz, Microchem. J. 2007, 86, 161-165.
47. C. Wang, H. Daimon, T. Onodera, T. Koda, S. H. Sun, Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 3644-3647
48. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 3588-3591
49. Z. Y. Zhou, Z. Z. Huang, D. J. Chen, Q. Wang, N. Tian, S. G. Sun, Angew. Chem. 2010, 122, 421-424
50. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 411-414.
51. N. H. Battey, N. C. James, A. J. Greenland, C. Brownlee, Plant Cell 1999, 11, 643-659.
52. Using Faraday's law, the charge Q corresponding to each spike is related to the number N of released molecules by Q=nFN, where n is the stoichiometric number of electrons of the Faradic detection (two for auxin oxidation) and F is the Faraday constant (96 500); the fact that average Q from complex events is larger than that from single events is possibly due to the fact that complex events involve "kiss and run" from few linked vesicles, such as clustered vesicles or vesicles fused with each other before release, or from the fact that such events happen mostly during release by very large vesicles as a consequence of their size. For variations of release mode with vesicle sizes, see for example:, L. A. Sombers, H. J. Hanchar, T. L. Colliver, N. Wittenberg, A. Cans, S. Arbault, C. Amatore, A. G. Ewing, J. Neurosci. 2004, 24, 303-309.
53. B. Noh, A. S. Murphy, E. P. Spalding, Plant Cell 2001, 13, 2441-2454
54. E. Remy, T. R. Cabrito, P. Baster, R. A. Batista, M. C. Teixeira, J. Friml, I. Sa-Correia, P. Duque, Plant Cell 2013, 25, 901-926.
55. J. Petrasek, J. Friml, Development 2009, 136, 2675-2688.