Immediate dissemination of student discoveries to amodel organism database enhances classroom-based research experiences

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 131-138

  Wiley, Emily A ^a   Stover, Nicholas A ^b  

^a KECK GRADUATE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b BRADLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CURRICULUM; GENETIC DATABASE; GENETICS; GENOME; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MOTIVATION; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; STUDENT; TETRAHYMENA; WRITING;

CURRICULUM; DATABASES, GENETIC; GENOME, PROTOZOAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERNET; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MOTIVATION; PUBLICATIONS; RESEARCH; STUDENTS; TETRAHYMENA; WRITING;

EID: 84897639326     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.13-07-0140     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011). Vision andChange in UndergraduateBiology:ACall toAction, Washington, DC.
2. Bauer K. W, Bennett J (2003). Alumni perceptions used to assess undergraduate research experience. J High Educ 2, 210-230.
3. Berardini T. Z, Li D, Muller R, Chetty R, Ploetz L, Singh S, Wensel A, Huala E. (2012). Assessment of community-submitted ontology annotations froma novel database-journal partnership. Database (Oxford) 2012, bas030.
4. Brame C. J, Pruitt WM, Robinson LC (2008). A molecular genetics laboratory course applying bioinformatics and cell biology in the context of original research. CBE Life Sci Educ 7, 410-421.
5. Campbell A., Eckdahl T, Fowlks E, Heyer L, Hoopes L, Ledbetter M, Rosenwald A. (2006). Collaborative programs: Genome Consortium for Active Teaching (GCAT). Science 311, 1103-1104.
6. Campbell A. M, Ledbetter MLS, Hoopes LLM, Eckdahl TT, Heyer LJ, Rosenwald A, Fowlks E, Tonidandel S, Bucholtz B, Gottfried G (2007). Genome Consortium for Active Teaching: meeting the goals of BIO2010. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 109-118.
7. Collins K., Gorovsky MA (2005). Tetrahymena thermophila. Curr Biol 15, R317-R318.
8. Harrison M., Dunbar D, Ratmansky L, Boyd K, Lopatto D (2011). Classroom-based science research at the introductory level: changes in career choices and attitude. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 279-286.
9. Howard HughesMedical Institute (2011). Science Education Alliance home page. www.hhmi.org/programs/science-education-alliance (accessed 21 October 2013).
10. Howard D. R, Miskowski JA (2005). Using a module-based laboratory to incorporate inquiry into a large cell biology course. Cell Biol Educ 4, 249-260.
11. Howe D. et al. (2008). Big data: the future of biocuration. Nature 455, 47-50.
12. Hunter A-B, Laursen SL, Seymour E (2007). Becoming a scientist: the role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development. Sci Educ 91, 36-74.
13. Jones L. S et al. (2011). Incorporating scientific publishing into an undergraduate neuroscience course: a case study using IMPULSE. J Undergrad Neurosci Educ 9, A84-A91.
14. Lopatto D. (2004). Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): first findings. Cell Biol Educ 3, 270-277.
15. Lopatto D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 297-306.
16. Lopatto D. et al. (2008). Genomics Education Partnership. Science 322, 684-685.
17. Malone C. D et al. (2008). Nucleus-specific importin alpha proteins and nucleoporins regulate protein import and nuclear division in the binucleate Tetrahymena thermophila. Eukaryot Cell 7, 1487-1499.
18. Marshall P. A (2007). Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae to test the mutagenicity of household compounds: an open ended hypothesis-driven teaching lab. CBE Life Sci Educ 6, 307-315.
19. Mazumder R., Natale DA, Julio JAE, Yeh L-S, Wu CH (2010). Community annotation in biology. Biol Direct 5, 12.
20. Mitchell B. F, Graziano MR (2006). From organelle to protein gel: a 6-wk laboratory project on flagellar proteins. Cell Biol Educ 5, 239-246.
21. Myers M., Burgess AB (2003). Inquiry-based laboratory course improves students' ability to design experiments and interpret data. Adv Physiol Educ 27, 26-33.
22. National Research Council (2005). America's Lab Report, Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
23. President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (2012). Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Office of Science and Technology.
24. Shaffer C. D et al. (2010). The Genomics Education Partnership: successful integration of research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of undergraduate institutions. CBE Life Sci Educ 9, 55-69.
25. Siritunga D., Montero-Rojas M, Carrero K, Toro G, Velez A, Carrero-Martinez F. A (2011). Culturally relevant inquiry-based laboratory module implementations in upper-division genetics and cell biology teaching laboratories. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 287-297.
26. Smith J. J, Wiley EA, Cassidy-Hanley DM (2012). Tetrahymena in the classroom. Methods Cell Biol 109, 411-430.
27. Stover N. A, Punia RS, Bowen MS, Dolins SB, Clark TG(2012). Tetrahymena Genome Database Wiki: a community-maintained model organism database. Database (Oxford) 2012, bas007.
28. Tatlovic M. (2008). Student science publishing: an exploratory study of undergraduate science research journals and popular sciencemagazines in the US and Europe. J Sci Commun 7, 1-9.
29. Treacy D. J, Sankaran SM, Gordon-Messer S, Saly D, Miller R, Isaac S. R, Kosinski-Collins MS (2011). Implementation of a projectbased molecular biology laboratory emphasizing protein structurefunction relationships in a large introductory biology laboratory course. CBE Life Sci Educ 10, 18-24.