Effect of social networks intervention in type 2 diabetes: A partial randomised study

Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 326-332

  Shaya, Fadia T ^a,b   Chirikov, Viktor V ^a   Howard, Deleonardo ^a   Foster, Clyde ^a   Costas, Julian ^c   Snitker, Soren ^b   Frimpter, Jeffrey ^c   Kucharski, Kathrin ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF PHARMACY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c SANOFI   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIABETES; DISEASE CONTROL; DISEASE SEVERITY; HEALTH EDUCATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; SOCIAL NETWORK; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BALTIMORE; MARYLAND; UNITED STATES;

GLYCOSYLATED HEMOGLOBIN;

AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH EDUCATION SA; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; INTERVENTION STUDY; MALE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PEER GROUP; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CARE; SELF CONCEPT; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STATISTICS; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

DIABETES; HEALTH EDUCATION SA; HEALTH PROMOTION;

AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGED; BALTIMORE; BLOOD GLUCOSE; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; INTERVENTION STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PEER GROUP; SELF CARE; SELF EFFICACY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84897627277     PISSN: 0143005X     EISSN: 14702738     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jech-2013-203274     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Loveman E, Frampton GK, Clegg AJ. The clinical effectiveness of diabetes education models for Type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess 2008;12:1-116, 3
2. Hibbard JH, Greene J. What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:207-14.
3. Shier G, Ginsburg M, Howell J, et al. Strong social support services, such as transportation and help for caregivers, can lead to lower health care use and costs. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:544-51.
4. Hibbard JH, Greene J, Overton V. Patients with lower activation associated with higher costs; delivery systems should know their patients' 'scores'. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:216-22.
5. Ghorob A, Bodenheimer T. Sharing the care to improve access to primary care. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1955-7.
6. Lanese BS, Dey A, Srivastava P, et al. Introducing the health coach at a primary care practice: a pilot study (part 2). Hosp Top 2011;89:37-42.
7. Dancer S, Courtney M. Improving diabetes patient outcomes: framing research into the chronic care model. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 2010;22:580-5.
8. Fisher EB, Boothroyd RI, Coufal MM, et al. Peer support for self-management of diabetes improved outcomes in international settings. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:130-9.
9. Kahn R. Reducing the impact of diabetes: is prevention feasible today, or should we aim for better treatment?. Health Aff (Millwood) 2012;31:76-83.
10. Gagliardino JJ, Arrechea V, Assad D, et al. Type 2 diabetes patients educated by other patients perform at least as well as patients trained by professionals. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2013;29:152-60.
11. Smith K, Christakis N. Social Networks and health. Annu Rev Sociol 2008;34:405-29.
12. Shaya FT, Yan X, Farshid M, et al. Social networks in cardiovascular disease management. Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res 2010;10:701-5.
13. Parrill R, Kennedy BR. Partnerships for health in the African American community: moving toward community-based participatory research. J Cult Divers 2011;18:150-4.
14. Mullins CD, Shaya FT, Blatt L, et al. A qualitative evaluation of a citywide Community Health Partnership program. J Natl Med Assoc 2012;104:53-60.
15. Johnson W, Shaya FT, Khanna N, et al. The Baltimore Partnership to Educate and Achieve Control of Hypertension (The BPTEACH Trial): a randomized trial of the effect of education on improving blood pressure control in a largely African American population. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2011;13:563-70.
16. Shaya FT, Gbarayor CM, Laird A, et al. Diabetes knowledge in a high risk urban population. Ethn Dis 2011;21:485-9.
17. Johnson W, Shaya F, Winston R, et al. Diabetes Control through an Educational Intervention. Ethn Dis 2013.
18. Shaya FT, Chirikov V. V, Daniel Mullins C, et al. Social networks help control hypertension. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2013;15:34-40.
19. Patients, Pharmacists Partnerships (P3) Program. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. Secondary Patients, Pharmacists Partnerships (P3) Program. University of Maryland School of Pharmacy. http://www.pharmacy.umaryland.edu/programs/p3/
20. The SF-12v2: An Even Shorter Health Survey. Secondary The SF-12v2: An Even Shorter Health Survey. http://www.sf-36.org/tools/sf12.shtml
21. Cohen S, Doyle WJ, Skoner DP, et al. Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. JAMA 1997;277:1940-4.
22. Bosscher RJ, Smit JH. Confirmatory factor analysis of the General Self-Efficacy Scale. Behav Res Ther 1998;36:339-43.
23. Chin W, Salisbury W, Pearson A, et al. Perceived cohesion in small groups adapting and testing the Perceived Cohesion Scale in a small-group setting. Small Group Res 1999;30:751-66.
24. Fitzgerald JT, Funnell MM, Hess GE, et al. The reliability and validity of a brief diabetes knowledge test. Diabet Care 1998;21:706-10.
25. Dale JR, Williams SM, Bowyer V. What is the effect of peer support on diabetes outcomes in adults? A systematic review. Diabet Med 2012;29:1361-77.
26. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Laurent DD, et al. Online diabetes self-management program: a randomized study. Diabet Care 2010;33:1275-81.
27. Lorig K, Ritter PL, Villa F, et al. Spanish diabetes self-management with and without automated telephone reinforcement: two randomized trials. Diabet Care 2008;31:408-14.
28. Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, et al. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:507-15.
29. Thom DH, Ghorob A, Hessler D, et al. Impact of peer health coaching on glycemic control in low-income patients with diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:137-44.
30. Bains SS, Egede LE. Associations between health literacy, diabetes knowledge, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in a low income population with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther 2011;13:335-41.
31. Nam S, Chesla C, Stotts NA, et al. Barriers to diabetes management: patient and provider factors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;93:1-9.
32. Onwudiwe NC, Mullins CD, Winston RA, et al. Barriers to self-management of diabetes: a qualitative study among low-income minority diabetics. Ethn Dis 2011;21:27-32.
33. Ford ME, Tilley BC, McDonald PE. Social support among African-American adults with diabetes, Part 2: A review. J Natl Med Assoc 1998;90:425-32.
34. Griffith DM, Ellis KR, Ober Allen J. How does health information influence African American men's health behavior? Am J Men's Health 2012;6:156-63.
35. Stellefson M, Dipnarine K, Stopka C. The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review. Prev Chronic Dis 2013;10:E26.
36. Philis-Thimikas A, Gilimer TP, Schultz J, et al. Community-created programs: Can they be the basis of innovative transformations in our health care practice? Implications from 15 years of testing, translating, and implementing community-based, culturally tailored diabetes management programs. Clin Diabet 2012;30:156-63.
37. Eisenstat SA, Ulman K, Siegel AL, et al. Diabetes group visits: integrated medical care and behavioral support to improve diabetes care and outcomes from a primary care perspective. Curr Diab Rep 2013;13:177-87.
38. Jortberg BT, Miller BF, Gabbay RA, et al. Patient-centered medical home: how it affects psychosocial outcomes for diabetes. Curr Diab Rep 2012;12:721-8