Co-evolution of design tactics and CSCWD systems: Methodological circulation and the TATIN-PIC platform

Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED

Volumn 9 DS75-09, Issue , 2013, Pages 315-324

  Guerra, Andrea Luigi ^a,b   Gidel, Thierry ^a   Kendira, Atman ^a   Vezzetti, Enrico ^b   Jones, Alistair ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

^b POLITECNICO DI TORINO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Collaborative design; Computer supported cooperative work in design; Design methodology; Early design phases; Methodological circulation

Indexed keywords

CO-EVOLUTIONARY APPROACH; COLLABORATIVE DESIGN; COMPUTER SUPPORT SYSTEM; DESIGN METHODOLOGY; EARLY DESIGN PHASIS; ETHNOGRAPHIC OBSERVATIONS; MULTIDISCIPLINARY DESIGN TEAMS; PRELIMINARY DESIGN PROCESS;

HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS; ITERATIVE METHODS;

DESIGN;

EID: 84897622327     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (38)

1. Boujut, J.-F., Blanco, E. (2003) Intermediary Objects as a Means to Foster Co-operation in Engineering Design. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) vol. 12, pp. 205-219.
2. Brown, T. (2009) Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation, HarperBusiness.
3. Bruner, J. (1990) Acts of Meaning: Four Lectures on Mind and Culture, Boston, USA: Harvard University Press.
4. Cross, N., Clayburn Cross, A. (1995) Observations of Teamwork and Social Processes in Design. Design Studies, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 143-170.
5. Darses, F. (1997) L'ingénierie concourante: un modèle en meilleure adéquation avec les processus cognitifs de conception. In P. Bossard, C. Chanchevrier and P. Leclair (eds), Ingénierie concourante, de la technique au social, Paris: Economica, pp. 39-55.
6. Dietz, P., Leigh, D. (2001) DiamondTouch: a multi-user touch technology. Proceedings of the 14th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '01, New York, USA, ACM Press, pp. 219-226.
7. Dorst, K. (1996) The design problem and its structure. In Cross, N., Christiaans, H., Dorst, K. (eds) (1996) Analysing Design Activity, Chichester, UK: John Wile, pp. 17-34.
8. Dorst, K., Cross, N. (2001) Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem-solution. Design Studies, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 425-437.
9. Forlines C. and Lilien R. (2008) Adapting a single-user, single-display molecular visualization application for use in a multi-user, multi-display environment.Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, AVI '08, ACM Press.
10. MacLeamy P. (2004) Collaboration, integrated information and the project lifecycle in building design, construction and operation. The Construction Users Roundtable, WP-1202.
11. Gidel, T., Kendira, A., Jones, A., Lenne, D., Barthès, J.-P., Moulin, C. (2011) Conducting Preliminary Design around an interactive tabletop, International Conference on Engineering Design ICED'11.
12. Guerra, A.L., Gidel, T., Vezzetti, E., Kendira, A. (2012) Co-evolution of design methods and CSCWD systems to improve the preliminary design process, CONFERE 2012, Venice S. Servolo, Italy, 6-9 July 2012.
13. Hartmann, B., Morris, M.R., Cassanego, A. (2006) Reducing Clutter on Tabletop Groupware Systems with Tangible Drawers'Adjunct. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of Ubiquitous Computing, UbiComp 2006, California, USA, 17-21 September 2006.
14. Hatchuel, A., Weil, B. (2009) C-K design theory: an advanced formulation. Res Eng Design vol. 19, pp. 181-192.
15. Jones, A., Kendira, A., Lenne, D., Gidel, T., Moulin, C. (2011) The TATIN-PIC Project: A Multi-modal Collaborative Work Environment for Preliminary Design, Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD'11), June 2011, pp. 154-161.
16. Jones, A., Kendira, A., Gidel, T., Moulin, C., Lenne, D., Barthès, J.-P., Guerra, A.L. (2012) Evaluating Collaboration in Table-centric Interactive Spaces, DCIS workshop in AVI 2012, Capri, Italy, 23-25 May 2012.
17. Keinonen, T.K., Takala, R. (2010) Product Concept Design: A Review of the Conceptual Design of Products in Industry. Springer.
18. Lenay, C., Steiner, P. (2010) Beyond the internalism/externalism debate: The constitution of the space of perception. Consciousness and Cognition vol. 19, pp. 938-952.
19. Maher, M.L., Poon, J., Boulanger, S. (1996) Formalising Design Exploration as Co-evolution: A Combined Gene Approach. In Gero, J.S. and Sundweeks F. (eds) Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD, London, UK: Chapman and Hall.
20. Maher, M.L., Cicognani, A., Simoff, S.J. (1998) An experimental study of computer mediated collaborative design. International Journal of Design Computing.
21. Mayo, E. (1949) Hawthorne and the Western Electric Company. The Social Problems of an Industrial Civilisation, Routledge.
22. Millier P. (2002) L'étude des marches qui n'existent pas encore. Paris, France: Editions d'Organisation.
23. Newell, A., Simon, H.A. (1972) Human problem solving. Oxford, UK: Prentice-Hall.
24. Olson S.J, Teasley, S., Covi, L., Olson, G. (2002) The (currently) unique advantage of collocated work. In Hinds, P.J., Kiesler, S.B. (eds) (2002) Distributed Work. Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press MA, pp. 113-135.
25. Nunamaker, J. F., Dennis, A. R., Valacich, J. S., Vogel, D. R. &George, J.F. (1991) Electronic Meeting Systems to Support Group Work. Communications of the ACM, vol. 34, no. 7, pp. 40-61.
26. Huber, G. P. (1990) A Theory of the Effects of Advanced Information Technology on Organisational Design, Intelligence and Decision Making. Academy of Management Review, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 47-71.
27. Plattner, H., Meinel, C., Leifer, L. (Eds.), 2010. Design Thinking: Understand-Improve-Apply, 1st Edition. ed. Springer.
28. Reymen, I., Dorst, K., Smulders, F. (2009) Co-evolution in Design Practice. In McDonnell, J. and Lloyd, P. (eds), About: Designing. Analysing Design Meeting, Leiden, The Netherlands: CRC PRESS/ Balkema, pp. 67-82.
29. Rogers, Y., Lindley, S. E. (2004) Collaborating around vertical and horizontal large interactive displays: which way is best? Interacting with Computers, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 1133-1152.
30. Rowe, G. P. (1987) Design Thinking, Cambridge, UK: The MIT Press.
31. Sarasvathy, S. D. (2001) Causation and Effectuation: Toward a theoretical shift from economic inevitability to entrepreneurial contingency. Academy of Management Review, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 243-288.
32. Scaravetti, D. (2004) Formulation préalable d'un problème de conception, pour l'aide à la décision en conception préliminaire, Bordeaux, France: ENSAM.
33. Shen, C., Lesh, N., Vernier, F., Forlines, C., Frost, J. (2002) Sharing and building digital group histories. CSCW '02: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work.
34. Shiba, S. (1995) Les outils du management de la qualité: guide pédagogique, Nanterre, France: Mouvement français pour la qualité, bibliothèque Qualité.
35. Simon, H. (1969) The Sciences of the Artificial, Cambridge, UK: MIT Press.
36. Vinck, D. and Jeantet, A. (1995) Mediating and Commissioning Objects in the SociotechnicalProcess of Product Design: A Conceptual Approach. In D. MacLean, P. Saviotti and D. Vinck (eds.), Management and New Technology: Design, Networks and Strategy, Bruxelles: COST Social Science Series
37. Wang, L., Shen, W., Xie, H., Neelamkavil, J., Pardasani, A. (2000) Collaborative conceptual design-state of art and future trends. Computer-Aided Design vol. 34, no. 13, pp. 981-996.
38. Wood, R., Kakebeeke, B., Debowski, S., Frese, M. (2000) The Impact of Enactive Exploration on Intrinsic Motivation, Strategy, and Performance in Electronic Search. Applied Psychology, vol. 49, pp. 263-283.