Co-evolution in design practice

About: Designing - Analysing Design Meetings

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 67-82

  Reymen, Isabelle ^a   Dorst, Kees ^a   Smulders, Frido ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77955866630     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Maher, M.L., Poon, J., and Boulanger, S. (1996) Formalising Design Exploration as Co-evolution: A Combined Gene Approach in J.S. Gero and F. Sudweeks (eds) Advances in Formal Design Methods for CAD, Chapman and Hall, London.
2. Dorst, K., and Cross, N. (2001) Creativity in the Design Process: Co-evolution of Problem-Solution, Design Studies, 22, pp. 425-437.
3. Mabogunje, A., Eris, O., Sonalkar, N., Jung, M. and Leifer, L. (Chapter 3) Spider Webbing: A Paradigm for Engineering Design Conversations during Concept Generation.
4. Dorst and Cross (2001) op. cit., p. 434.
5. McDonnell, J. (Chapter 14) Collaborative Negotiation in Design: A Study of Design Conversations between Architect and Building Users.
6. Luck, R. (Chapter 13) "Does this Compromise your Design?" Socially Producing a Design Concept in Talk-in-Interaction.
7. Harfield, S. (2007) On Design 'Problematization': Theorising Differences in Designed Outcomes, Design Studies, 28, pp. 159-173.
8. Glock, F. (Chapter 16) Aspects of Language Use in Design Conversation.
9. Roozenburg, N., and Eekels, J. (1995) Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods, Wiley.
10. Houkes, W., Vermaas, P.E., Dorst, K., and de Vries, M.J. (2002) Design and Use as Plans: An Action-Theoretical Account, Design Studies, 23, pp. 303-320.
11. Gero, J.S., and Kannengiesser, U. (2004) The Situated Function-Behavior-Structure Framework, Design Studies, 25, pp. 373-391.
12. Star, S.L., and Griesemer, J.R. (1989) Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39, Social Studies of Science, 19(3), pp. 387-420.
13. Bucciarelli, L.L. (2002) Between Thought and Object in Engineering Design, Design Studies, 23, pp. 219-231.
14. Smulders, F.E. (2007) Team Mental Models in Innovation: Means and Ends. CoDesign, 3, pp. 51-58.
15. Smulders, F.E. (2006) Get Synchronized! Bridging the Gap between Design and Volume Production, Ph.D Thesis, Delft University ofTechnology, The Netherlands.
16. Dougherty, D. (1992) Interpretative Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms, Organization Science, 3, pp. 192-202.
17. Bucciarelli, L.L. (1988) An Ethnographic Perspective on Engineering Design, Design Studies, 9, pp. 159-168.
18. Mohammed, S., and Dumville, B.C. (2001) Team Mental Models in a Team Knowledge Framework: Expanding Theory and Measurements across Disciplinary Boundaries, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, pp. 89-106.
19. Kim D.H. (1993) The Link between Individual and Organizational Learning, Sloan Management Review, 35, pp. 37-50.
20. Krippendorff, K. (2006) The Semantic Turn, A New Foundation for Design, Taylor and Francis, New York; p. 224.
21. The coding schemes used for the data analysis in this volume could be useful here, for example the behavioural categories of Le Dantec and Do, the design criterion and design features of Akin, the problem definition and idea generation of Atman et al. Le Dantec, C.A., and Do, E.Y. The Mechanisms of Value Transfer in Design Meetings (Chapter 6).
22. Akin, O. Variants and Invariants of Design Cognition (Chapter 10).
23. Atman, C.J., Borgford-Parnell, J., Deibel, K., Kang, A., Ng, W.H., Kilgore, D. and Turns, J. Matters of Context in Design (Chapter 22).
24. Lewin, A.Y., Volberda, H.W. (1999) Prolegomena on Coevolution: A framework for research on strategy and new organizational forms, Organization Science, 10, pp. 519-534.