Beyond the internalism/externalism debate: The constitution of the space of perception

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 938-952

  Lenay, Charles ^a   Steiner, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE TECHNOLOGIE DE COMPIÈGNE   (France)

Author keywords

Constitution; Enaction; Externalism; Internalism; Sensori motor; Sensory substitution; Space

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; COGNITION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PERCEPTION; PHILOSOPHY; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; THEORY;

AWARENESS; BLINDNESS; DISTANCE PERCEPTION; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; KINESTHESIS; ORIENTATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RETENTION (PSYCHOLOGY); SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; STEREOGNOSIS; TOUCH;

EID: 78149496201     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.06.011     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams F., Aisawa K. The bounds of cognition 2008, Blackwell.
2. Auvray, M., Hanneton, S., Lenay, C., & O'Regan, J. K. (2004). Exteriorisation in sensory substitution. In First joint conference of SPP & ESPP, 3-6 July, Barcelona, Spain.
3. Auvray M., Hanneton S., Lenay C., O'Regan J.K. There is something out there: Distal attribution in sensory substitution, twenty years later. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience 2005, 4(4):505-521.
4. Bach y Rita P. Sensory substitution in rehabilitation. Rehabilitation of the neurological patient 1982, 361-383. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. L. Illis, M. Sedgwick, H. Granville (Eds.).
5. Bach y Rita P., Danilov Y., Tyler M.E., Grimm R.J. Late human brain plasticity: Vestibular substitution with a tongue brainport human-machine interface. Intellectica 2005, (40/1):115-122.
6. Block N. Review of Alva Noë's action in perception. Journal of Philosophy 2005, CII(5):259-272.
7. Clark A. Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension 2008, Oxford University Press.
8. Clark A., Chalmers D. The extended mind. Analysis 1998, 58:10-23.
9. Colby C. Spatial perception. The MIT encyclopedia of the cognitive sciences 1999, 784-787. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA/London. R. Wilson, F. Keil (Eds.).
10. Colby C.L., Duhamel J.R. Spatial representations for action in parietal cortex. Cognitive Brain Research 1996, 5(1-2):105-115.
11. Collins C.C., Bach y Rita P. Transmission of pictorial information through the skin. Advances in Biological Medicine and Physiology 1973, 14:285-315.
12. Epstein W., Hugues B., Schneider S., Bach-y-Rita P. Is there anything out there? A study of distal attribution in response to vibrotactile stimulation. Perception 1986, 15:275-284.
13. Fodor J. Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in philosophy of mind 1987, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
14. Froese, T., & Spiers, A. (2007). Towards a phenomenological pragmatics of enactive perception. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on enactive interfaces (pp. 105-108). Grenoble, France: Association ACROE.
15. Gibson J.J. The senses considered as perceptual systems 1966, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
16. Gibson J.J. The ecological approach to visual perception 1986, Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
17. Goldberg, M. E., Colby, C. L., & Duhamel, J. R. (1990). Representation of visuomotor space in the parietal lobe of the monkey. In Cold spring harbor symposia in quantitative biology (Vol. 55). Cold Spring Harbor: Lab. Press.
18. Hurley S. Consciousness in action 1998, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA/London.
19. Husserl, E. (1988). Thing and space: Lectures of 1907 (R. Rojcewicz, Transl.). Springer (Original work published 1907).
20. Husserl, E. (2008). Ideas pertaining to a pure phenomenology and to a phenomenological philosophy: First book: General introduction to a pure phenomenology (F. Kersten, Transl.). Springer (Original work published 1913).
21. Lenay, C., Canu, S., & Villon, P. (1997). Technology and perception: The contribution of sensory substitution systems. In Second international conference on cognitive technology (pp. 44-53). Aizu, Japan: IEEE.
22. Lenay C., Gapenne O., Hanneton S., Marque C., Genouel C. Sensory substitution: Limits and perspectives. Touching for knowing 2003, 275-292. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. Y. Hatwell, A. Streri, E. Gentaz (Eds.).
23. Lenay C., Sebbah F. La constitution de la perception spatiale. Approches phénoménologique et expérimentale. Intellectica 2001, 32:45-86.
24. Merleau-Ponty M. Phénoménologie de la perception 1945, Gallimard, Paris.
25. Mossio M., Taraborelli D. Action-dependent perceptual invariants: From ecological to sensorimotor approaches. Consciousness and Cognition 2008, 17(4):1324-1340.
26. Noë A. Action in perception 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge.
27. O'Keefe J., Nadel L. The hippocampus as a cognitive map 1978, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
28. O'Regan J.K., Noë A. A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:939-1031.
29. Pace, M. (2005). Review of action in perception (Alva Noë). Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, 2005.11.13.
30. Paillard J. Les déterminants moteurs de l'organisation de l'espace. Cahiers de Psychologie 1971, 14:261-316.
31. Philipona D., O'Regan K., Nadal J-P. Is there something out there? Inferring space from sensorimotor dependencies. Neural Computation 2003, 15(9):2029-2049.
32. Piaget, J. (1936). La naissance de l'intelligence chez l'enfant. Neuchâtel et Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.
33. Poincaré H. L'espace et la géométrie. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 1895, 3:631-646.
34. Poincaré H. La science et l'hypothèse 1907, Flammarion, Paris.
35. Prinz J. Putting the brakes on enactive perception. Psyche 2006, 12/1.
36. Rao R.P.N., Ruderman D.L. Learning Lie groups for invariant visual perception. Advances in Neural Info Processing Systems 1999, 11:810-816.
37. Rossetti, Y. (1997). Des modalités sensorielles aux représentations spatiales en action: Représentations multiples d'un espace unique. In J. Proust (Ed.), Perception et inter-modalité: Approches actuelles de la question de Molyneux (pp. 179-221). Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
38. Rowlands, M. (2003). Externalism: Putting mind and world back together again. Chesham: Acumen.
39. Siegle, J. H., & Warren, W. H. (2007). Distance perception in visual-to-tactile sensory substitution. In Three dimensional sensory and motor space, Sant Feliu de Guixols, Spain, 6-11 October.
40. Varela F.J., Thompson E., Rosch E. The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience 1991, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Wilson R. Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences 2004, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
42. Ziat M., Lenay C., Gapenne O., Stewart J., Ali Ammar A., Aubert D. Perceptive supplementation for an access to graphical environment. Lectures Notes in Computer Science 2007, 4554:841-850.