Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization (SAADO) for a 3-d rigid wing

14th Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference

Volumn , Issue , 1999, Pages 402-418

  Gumbert, Clyde R ^a   Hou, Gene J W ^b   Newman, Perry A ^a  

^a NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^b Old Dominion University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; RIGID WINGS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AERODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; COMPUTATIONAL EXPENSE; COMPUTATIONAL TIME; CONVENTIONAL OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN OPTIMIZATION; FLOW ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION METHOD; STATE OF THE ART;

SHAPE OPTIMIZATION;

EID: 84983185715     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-3296     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Newman, P. A., Hou, G. J.-W., and Taylor, A. C, “Observations Regarding Use of Advanced CFD Analysis, Sensitivity Analysis, and Design Codes in MDO,” in Ref. 3, pp. 263-279; also ICASE Report 96-16, NASA CR 198293, (available electronically at www.icase.edu).
2. Newman, J.C, III, Taylor, A. C, III, Barnwell, R. W., Newman, P. A., and Hou, G. J.-W., “Overview of Sensitivity Analysis and Shape Optimization for Complex Aerodynamic Configurations,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 36, No. 1,1999, pp. 87-96.
3. Alexandrov, N. M., and Hussaini, M. Y., Eds., Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: State of the Art, SIAM Proceedings Series, SIAM, Philadelphia, 1997.
4. Ghattas, O. and Orozco, C. E., “A Parallel Reduced Hessian SQP Method for Shape Optimization,” in Ref. 3, pp. 133-152.
5. Hou, G. J.-W., Taylor, J W, III, Mani, S. V., and Newman, P. A., “Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization,” Abstracts from 2nd U.S. National Congress on Computational Mechanics, Washington, DC, Aug., 1993, pp. 130.
6. Mani, S. V., “Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization,” M. S. Thesis, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, Dec. 1993.
7. Hou, G. J.-W., Korivi, V. M., Taylor, A. C, III, Maroju, V., and Newman, P. A., “Simultaneous Aerodynamic Analysis and Design Optimization (SAADO) of a Turbulent Transonic Airfoil Using a Navier-Stokes Code With Automatic Differentiation (ADIFOR),” Computational Aerosciences Workshop 95, edited by W. J. Feiereisen, and A. K. Lacer, NASA CD CP-20010, Jan. 1996, pp. 82-85.
8. Rumsey, C, Biedron, R., and Thomas, J., “CFL3D: Its History and Some Recent Applications,” NASA TM-112861, May 1997.
9. Sherman, L., Taylor, Α, III, Green, L., Newman, P., Hou, G., and Korivi, M, “First- and Second-Order Aerodynamic Sensitivity Derivatives via Automatic Differentiation with Incremental Iterative Methods,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol.129, No. 2, 1996, pp. 307-336.
10. Bischof, C. H., Carle, A., Corliss, G. F., Griewank, A., and Hovland, P., “ADIFOR: Generating Derivative Codes from Fortran Programs,” Scientific Programming, Vol. 1, No. 1,1992, pp. 1-29.
11. Bischof, C, and Griewank, A., “ADIFOR: A Fortran System for Portable Automatic Differentiation,” Proceedings, Fourth AIAA/USAF/NASA/OAI Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Cleveland, Sept. 1992, pp. 433-441; also AIAA Paper 92-4744 CP.
12. Taylor, A. C, III, Oloso, A., and Newman, J.C, III., “CFL3D.ADJJ (Version 2.0): An Efficient, Accurate, General-Purpose Code for Flow Shape-Sensitivity Analysis,” AIAA Paper 972204, June 1997.
13. Smith, R. E., Bloor, M. I. G., Wilson, M. J., and Thomas, A. T., “Rapid Airplane Parametric Input Design (RAPID), “ Proceedings, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 452-462; also AIAA Paper 95-1687.
14. Jones, W. T., and Samareh-Abolhassani, J., “A Grid Generation System for Multidisciplinary Design Optimization,” Proceedings, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 474-482; also AIAA Paper 95- 1689.
15. Bischof, C, Jones, W. T., Samareh-Abolhassani, J., and Mauer, A., “Experiences with the Application of the ADIC Automatic Differentiation Tool to the CSCMDO 3-D Volume Grid Generation Code,” AIAA Paper 96- 0716, Jan. 1996.
16. Vatsa, V. N., and Wedan, B. W., “Effect of Sidewall Boundary Layer on a Wing in a Wind Tunnel,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 26, No. 2, 1989, pp. 157-161; also AIAA Paper 88-1020, Jan. 1988.
17. Anon., DOT Users Manual: Version 4.20, Vanderplaats Research & Development, Inc., Colorado Springs, May 1995.
18. Private communication Alexandrov, N., and presentation, “Multilevel Optimization with Surrogates In Wing Design,” Sixth SLAM Conference on Optimization, Atlanta, May, 1999.
19. Carle, A., Fagan, M., and Green, L. L., “Preliminary Results from the Application of Automated Adjoint Code Generation to CFL3D,” Proceedings, 12th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, St. Louis, Sept. 1998, pp. 807-817; also AIAA Paper 98-4807.
20. Ghattas, O., and Bark, J.-H., “Optimal Control of Two- and Three-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Flows,” Journal of Computational Physics, Vol. 136, No. 2, 1997, pp.231-244.
21. Taasan, S., “Trends in Aerodynamic Design and Optimization: A Mathematical Viewpoint,” Proceedings, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, June 1995, pp. 961-970; also, AIAA Paper 95-1731.