Identifying sources of evidence used to assess faculty teaching performance

Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations

Volumn 13, Issue , 2012, Pages 109-126

  Green, Brian Patrick ^a   Wang, Guangcheng ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN DEARBORN   (United States)

^b QUFU NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897584220     PISSN: 10854622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1108/S1085-4622(2012)0000013010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AACSB. (2009) Business School Priorities for All AACSB International Member institutions. Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/dataandresearch/ schoolpriorities.asp. Accessed on May 18, 2012.
2. AACSB. (2010). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation (Rev. ed., January 31, 2010). Tampa, FL: AACSB.
3. Calderon, T. G., & Green, B. P. (1997). Use of multiple information types in assessing accounting faculty teaching performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 5(2), 221-239. (Pubitemid 127162563)
4. Caskin, W. E. (1983). Concerns about using student ratings in community colleges. In A. Smith (Ed.), Evaluating faculty and staff: New directions for community colleges. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5. Cottell, P. G., Jr. (2010). Shreffler stores accounting issues related to consumer receivables, asset impairment, and discontinued operations: A problem-based learning unfolding problem. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 775-787.
6. Crumbley, L. D., & Fliedner, E. (2002). Accounting administrators' perceptions of student evaluation of teaching (SET) information. Quality Assurance in Education, 10(4), 213-222.
7. Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H., & Platt, M. B. (2010). Class participation in accounting courses: Factors that affect student comfort and learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(4), 613-629.
8. Edgerton, R., Hutchings, P., & Quinlan, K. (1991). The teaching portfolio: Capturing the scholarship in teaching. Washington, DC: American Association of Higher Education.
9. Green, B. P., Calderon, T. G., & Reider, B. (1998). A content analysis of student evaluation's validity, effectiveness, and confounding effects. Issues in Accounting Education, 13(1), 15-30.
10. Handwerk, P. G., Carson, C., & Blackwell, K. M. (2000). Online vs. paper-and-pencil surveying of students: A case study. 40th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Cincinnati, OH (May 21-24
11. Hansen, J. D. (2006). Using problem-based learning in accounting. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4), 221-224.
12. Hasselback, J. R. (2009). Accounting faculty directory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
13. Irving, J. H. (2011). Integrating research into an undergraduate accounting course. Issues in Accounting Education, 26(2), 287-303.
14. Kemp, B. W., & Kumar, G. S. (1990). Student evaluations: Are we using them correctly? Journal of Education for Business, 65(November/December), 106-111.
15. Kulik, J. A., & McKeachie, W. J. (1975). The evaluation of teachers in higher education. Review of Research in Education, 3, 210-240.
16. Lavoie, D., & Rosman, A. J. (2007). Using active student-centered learning-based instructional design to develop faculty and improve course design, delivery, and evaluation. Issues in Accounting Education, 22(1), 105-118.
17. Ling, C., & Libby, T. (2010). Writing mini-cases: An active learning assignment. Issues in Accounting Education, 25(2), 245-265.
18. Lowman, J. (1984). Mastering the techniques of teaching. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
19. Lucas, U. (2011). Towards a ''scholarship of teaching and learning'': The individual and the communal journey. Accounting Education, 20(3), 239-243.
20. Marsh, H. W. (1982). SEEQ: A reliable, valid, and useful instrument for collecting student evaluations of university teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 52, 77-95.
21. Marsh, H. W. (1984). Students' evaluation of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 707-754.
22. Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253-388.
23. Marsh, H. W., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1982). Effects of expressiveness, content coverage, and incentive on multidimensional student rating scales: New interpretation of the Dr. Fox effect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74(1), 126-134.
24. McKeachie, W. J. (1979). Student ratings of faculty: A reprise. Academe, 65(6), 384-397.
25. Moore, R. (1990). Student evaluations of teaching. The American Biology Teacher, 52, 262-264.
26. Morgan, D. A., Sneed, J., & Swinney, L. (2003). Are student evaluations a valid measure of teaching effectiveness: Perceptions of accounting faculty members and administrators. Management Research News, 26(7), 17-32.
27. Murray, H. G. (1983). Low-inference classroom teaching behaviors and student ratings of college teaching effectiveness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(1), 138-149.
28. O'Neil, C., & Wright, A. (1993). Recording teaching accomplishment: A Dalhousie guide to the teaching dossier. Halifax, Nova Scotia: Office of Instructional Development and Technology. Dalhousie University.
29. Petridou, E., & Sarri, K. (2004). Evaluation research in business schools: Students' rating myth. The International Journal of Educational Management, 18(3), 152-159. (Pubitemid 38334706)
30. Seldin, P. (1984). Changing practices in faculty education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31. Seldin, P. (1993). The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. The Chronicle of Higher Education, July 21, p. A40.
32. Trahan, C. M., & Swindle, B. (1988). A good accounting instructor: A student perspective. Journal of Education for Business, 63(5), 216-219.
33. Weinberg, B. A., Hashimoto, M., & Fleisher, B. M. (2009). Evaluating teaching in higher education. Research in Economic Education, 40(3), 227-261.
34. White, C. S., & Ahmadi, M. (1986). A novel approach to the analysis of a teacher-evaluation system. Journal of Education for Business, 61(October), 24-27.