Determination of three-dimensional distribution of electrical conductivity in the Earth's mantle from Swarm satellite data: Time-domain approach

Earth, Planets and Space

Volumn 65, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 1239-1246

  Velímský, Jakub ^a  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

3 D electromagnetic induction; 3 D inversion; Mantle conductivity anomalies; Time domain

Indexed keywords

ELECTRICAL CONDUCTIVITY; INVERSE PROBLEM; MAGNETIC FIELD; MANTLE STRUCTURE; SATELLITE DATA; SATELLITE MISSION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

EID: 84897583704     PISSN: 13438832     EISSN: 18805981     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5047/eps.2013.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Banks, R. J., Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. Astron. Soc, 17, 457-487, 1969.
2. Blackford, L. S., J. Choi, A. Cleary, E. D'Azevedo, J. Demmel, I. Dhillon, J. Dongarra, S. Hammarling, G. Henry, A. Petitet, K. Stanley, D. Walker, and R. C. Whaley, ScaLAPACK Users' Guide, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 1997.
3. Dorn, O., H. Bertete-Aquirre, J. G. Berryman, and G. C. Papanicolaou, A nonlinear inversion method for 3D electromagnetic imaging using adjoint fields, Inverse Problems, 15, 1523-1558, 1999.
4. Everett, M. E., S. Constable, and C. G. Constable, Effects of near-surface conductance on global satellite induction responses, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 277-286, 2003.
5. Fichtner, A., Full Seismic Waveform Modelling and Inversion, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2011.
6. Fornberg, B., A Practical Guide to Pseudospectral Methods, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1996.
7. Hamano, Y., A new time-domain approach for the electromagnetic induction problem in a three-dimensional heterogeneous earth, Geophys. J. Int., 150, 753-769, 2002.
8. Hansen, P., Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve, SIAM Rev, 34, 561-580, 1992.
9. Kelbert, A., G. D. Egbert, and A. Schultz, Non-linear conjugate gradient inversion for global EM induction: Resolution studies, Geophys. J. Int., 173(2), 365-381, 2008.
10. Kelbert, A., A. Schultz, and G. D. Egbert, Global electromagnetic induction constraints on transition-zone water content variations, Nature, 460, 1003-1007, 2009.
11. Koyama, T., H. Shimizu, H. Utada, M. Ichiki, E. Ohtani, and R. Hae, Water content in the mantle transition zone beneath the North Pacific derived from the electrical conductivity anomaly, in Earth's Deep Water Cycle, edited by S. Jacobsen and S. van der Lee, AGU Geophys. Monogr. Ser., 168, 171-179, 2006.
12. Kuvshinov, A., 3-D Global induction in the oceans and solid Earth: Recent progress in modeling magnetic and electric fields from sources of mag-netospheric, ionospheric and oceanic origin, Surv. Geophys., 29, 139-186, 2008.
13. Kuvshinov, A., Deep electromagnetic studies from land, sea and space: Progress status in the past 10 years, Surv. Geophys., 33, 169-209, 2012.
14. Kuvshinov, A. and N. Olsen, Modelling the ocean effect of geomagnetic storms at ground and satellite altitude, in Earth Observation with CHAMP, Results from Three Years Orbit, edited by Ch. Reigber, H. Lühr, P. Schwintzer, and J. Wickert, 353-358, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 2005.
15. Kuvshinov, A. V. and N. Olsen, A global model of mantle conductivity derived from 5 years of CHAMP, Ørsted, and SAC-C magnetic data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L18301, 2006.
16. Kuvshinov, A. and A. Semenov, Global 3-D imaging of mantle electrical conductivity based on inversion of observatory C-responses I. An approach and its verification, Geophys. J. Int., 189, 1335-1352, 2012.
17. Kuvshinov, A., J. Velímský, P. Tarits, A. Semenov, O. Pankratov, L. Tøffner-Clausen, Z. Martinec, N. Olsen, T. Sabaka, and A. Jackson, Level 2 products and performances for mantle studies with Swarm. Swarm Science Study under ESA contract, final report, 2010.
18. Lahiri, B. N. and A.T. Price, Electromagnetic induction in nonuniform conductors and the determination of the conductivity of the Earth from terrestrial magnetic variations, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., A237, 509-540, 1939.
19. Langel, R. A., Main field, in Geomagnetism, edited by J. A. Jacobs, 249-512, Academic Press, London, 1987.
20. Martinec, Z. and J. Velímský, The adjoint sensitivity method of global electromagnetic induction for CHAMP magnetic data, Geophys. J. Int., 179, 1372-1396, 2009.
21. McGillivray, P. R., D. W. Oldenburg, R. G. Ellis, and T. M. Habashy, Calculation of sensitivities for the frequency-domain electromagnetic problem, Geophys. J. Int., 116(1), 1-4, 1994.
22. Olsen, N. and A. Kuvshinov, Modeling the ocean effect of geomagnetic storms, Earth Planets Space, 56, 525-530, 2004.
23. Olsen, N., F. Lowes, and T. Sabaka, Ionospheric and induced field leakage in geomagnetic field models, and derivation of candidate models for DGRF 1995 and DGRF 2000, Earth Planets Space, 57, 1191-1196, 2005.
24. Olsen, N., R. Haagmans, T. J. Sabaka, A. Kuvshinov, S. Maus, M. E. Pu-rucker, M. Rother, V. Lesur, and M. Mandea, The Swarm End-to-End mission simulator study: A demonstration of separating the various contributions to Earth's magnetic field using synthetic data, Earth Planets Space, 58(4), 359-370, 2006.
25. Olsen, N., E. Friis-Christensen, R. Floberghagen, P. Alken, C. D Beggan, A. Chulliat, E. Doombos, J. T. da Encarnação, B. Hamilton, G. Hulot, J. van den IJssel, A. Kuvshinov, V. Lesur, H. Lühr, S. Macmillan, S. Maus, M. Noja, P. E. H. Olsen, J. Park, G. Plank, C. Piithe, J. Rauberg, P. Ritter, M. Rother, T. J. Sabaka, R. Schachtschneider, O. Sirol, C. Stolle, E. Thébault, A. W. P. Thomson, L. Tøffner-Clausen, J. Velímský, P. Vigneron, and P. N. Visser, The Swarm Satellite Constellation Application and Research Facility (SCARF) and Swarm data products, Earth Planets Space, 65, this issue, 1189-1200, 2013.
26. Pankratov, O., D. Avdeev, and A. Kuvshinov, Electromagnetic field scattering in a heterogeneous Earth: A solution to the forward problem, Phys. Solid Earth, 31, 201-209, 1995.
27. Press, W. H., S. A. Teukolsky, W T. Vetterling and B. P. Flannery, Numerical Recipes in Fortran. The Art of Scientific Computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1992.
28. Piithe, C. and A. Kuvshinov, Determination of the 3-D distribution of electrical conductivity in Earth's mantle from Swarm satellite data: Frequency domain approach based on inversion of induced coefficients, Earth Planets Space, 65, this issue, 1247-1256, 2013.
29. Sabaka, T. J., L. Tøffner-Clausen, and N. Olsen, Use of the Comprehensive Inversion method for Swarm satellite data analysis, Earth Planets Space, 65, this issue, 1201-1222, 2013.
30. Semenov, A. and A. Kuvshinov, Global 3-D imaging of mantle conductivity based on inversion of observatory C-responses C-responses. II, Data analysis and results, Geophys. J. Int., 191(3), 881-1470, 2012.
31. Shimizu, H., H. Utada, K. Baba, T. Koyama, M. Obayashi, and Y. Fukao, Three-dimensional imaging of electrical conductivity in the mantle transition zone beneath the North Pacific Ocean by a semi-global induction study, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 183, 262-269, 2010.
32. Tarits, P. and M. Mandea, The heterogeneous electrical conductivity structure of the lower mantle, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter, 183, 115-125, 2010.
33. Velímský, J. and C. C. Finlay, Effect of a metallic core on transient geomagnetic induction, Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst., 12, Q05011, 2011.
34. Velímský, J. and Z. Martinec, Time-domain, spherical harmonic-finite element approach to transient three-dimensional geomagnetic induction in a spherical heterogeneous Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 160, 81-101, 2005.
35. Velímský, J., Z. Martinec, and M. E. Everett, Electrical conductivity in the Earths mantle inferred from CHAMP satellite measurements, I. Data processing and 1-D inversion, Geophys. J. Int., 166, 529-542, 2006.