Time-domain, spherical harmonic-finite element approach to transient three-dimensional geomagnetic induction in a spherical heterogeneous earth

Geophysical Journal International

Volumn 161, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 81-101

  Velímský, Jakub ^a,b   Martinec, Zdeněk ^a,c  

^a CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c GFZ GERMAN RESEARCH CENTRE FOR GEOSCIENCES   (Germany)

Author keywords

Electromagnetic induction; Lateral conductivity variations; Numerical modelling; Spherical harmonics

Indexed keywords

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; GEOMAGNETIC FIELD; SPHERICAL HARMONICS;

EID: 17744392620     PISSN: 0956540X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2005.02546.x     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Anderson, E. et al., 1999. LAPACK User's Guide, 3rd edn, SIAM, Philadelphia.
2. Banks, R.J., 1969. Geomagnetic variations and the electrical conductivity of the upper mantle, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 17, 457-487.
3. Daglis, I.A. & Kozyra, J.U., 2002. Outstanding issues of ring current dynamics, J. Atmos. Solar Terr. Phys., 64, 253-264.
4. Duffy, T.S. & Hernley, R.J., 1995. Some like it hot: The temperature structure of the Earth, Rev. Geophys., 33, Suppl., part 1, 5-10.
5. Everett, M.E. & Martinec, Z., 2003. Spatiotemporal response of a conducting sphere under simulated geomagnetic storm conditions, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 138, 163-181.
6. Everett, M.E. & Schultz, A., 1995. Geomagnetic induction in eccentrically nested spheres, Phys. Earth planet. Int., 92, 189-198.
7. Everett, M.E. & Schultz, A., 1996. Geomagnetic induction in a heterogeneous sphere: Azimuthally symmetric test computations and the response of an undulating 660-km discontinuity, J. geophys. Res., 101(B2), 2765-2783.
8. Everett, M.E., Constable, S. & Constable, C., 2003. Effects of near-surface conductance on global satellite induction responses, Geophys. J. Int., 153, 277-286.
9. Fainberg, E.B., Kuvshinov, A.V. & Singer, B.Sh., 1990. Electromagnetic induction in a spherical earth with non-uniform oceans and continents in electric contact with the underlying medium-I. Theory, method and example, Geophys. J. Int., 102, 273-281.
10. Hamano, Y., 2002. A new time-domain approach for the electromagnetic induction problem in a three-dimensional heterogeneous earth, Geophys. J. Int., 150, 753-769.
11. Křížek, M. & P. Neittaanmäki, 1990. Finite Element Approximation of Variational Problems and Applications, Longman Scientific and Technical, Harlow, and Wiley, New York.
12. Kuvshinov, A.V. & Pankratov, O.V., 1994. Electromagnetic induction in a spherical Earth with inhomogeneous conducting mantle: thin sheet forward problem. In: Proc. 12th workshop on electromagnetic induction in the Earth, p. 53, ed. Menvielle, M., Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.
13. Langel, R.A., 1987. The main field, in, Geomagnetism, Vol. 1, pp. 249-512, ed. Jacobs J.A., Academic Press, London.
14. Martinec, Z., 1989. Program to calculate the spectral harmonic expansion coefficients ofthe two scalar fields product, Comput. Phys. Commun. 54, 177-182.
15. Martinec, Z., 1997. Spectral-finite element approach to two-dimensional electromagnetic induction in a spherical Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 130, 583-594.
16. Martinec, Z., 1998. Geomagnetic induction in multiple eccentrically nested spheres, Geophys. J. Int., 132, 96-110.
17. Martinec, Z., 1999. Spectral-finite element approach to three-dimensional electromagnetic induction in a spherical Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 136, 229-250.
18. Martinec, Z., Everett, M.E. & Velímský, J., 2003. Time-domain, spectral-finite element approach to transient two-dimensional geomagnetic induction in a spherical heterogoeneous earth, Geophys. J. Int., 155, 33-43.
19. Parkinson, W.D. & Hutton, V.R.S., 1989. The electrical conductivity of the Earth, in, Geomagnetism, Vol. 3, pp. 261-321, ed. Jacobs J.A., Academic Press, London.
20. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T. & Flannery, B.P., 1992. Numerical recipes in Fortran. The art of scientific computing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
21. Schultz, A. & Larsen, J., 1987. On the electrical conductivity of the mid mantle: I. Calculation of equivalent scalar magnetotelluric response functions, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 88, 733-761.
22. Tarits, P., 1994. Electromagnetic studies of global geodynamic processes, Surv. Geophys., 15, 209-238.
23. Uyeshima, M. & Schultz, A., 2000. Geoelectromagnetic induction in a heterogeneous sphere: a new three-dimensional forward solver using a conservative staggered-grid finite difference method, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 636-650.
24. Varshalovich, D.A., Moskalev, A.N. & Khersonskii, V.K., 1989. Quantum Theory of Angular Momentum, World Scientific, Singapore.
25. Velímský, J., Everett, M.E. & Marinec, Z., 2003. The transient Dst electro-magnetic induction signal at satellite altitudes for a realistic 3-D electrical conductivity in the crast and mantle, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(7), 1355-1359.
26. Xu, Y., Poe, B.T., Shankland, T.J. & Rubie, D.C., 1998. Electrical conductivity of olivine, wadsleyite, and ringwoodite under upper-mantle conditions, Science, 280, 1415-1418.
27. Yoshimura, R. & Oshiman, N., 2002. Edge-based finite element approach to the simulation of geolectromagnetic induction in a 3-D sphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29(3), 1039-1043.
28. Zhang, T.S. & Schultz, A., 1992. A 3-D perturbation solution for the EM induction problem in a spherical earth-the forward problem, Geophys. J. Int., 111, 319-334.