Networking theoretical frames: The ReMath enterprise

Educational Studies in Mathematics

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 329-355

  Artigue, Michèle ^a   Mariotti, Maria Alessandra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cross experimentations; Digital technologies; Educational theories; Semiotic representations; Theoretical networking

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897580384     PISSN: 00131954     EISSN: 15730816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10649-013-9522-2     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Artigue, M. (2002). Learning mathematics in a CAS environment: The genesis of a reflection about instrumentation and the dialectics between technical and conceptual work. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 7, 245-274.
2. Artigue, M. (Ed.) (2009a). Connecting approaches to technology enhanced learning in mathematics: The TELMA experience. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 14(3).
3. Artigue, M. (2009b). Rapports et articulations entre cadres théoriques: Le cas de la théorie anthropologique du didactique [Relations and articulations between theoretical frameworks: The case of the anthropological theory of didactics]. Recherches en Didactique des Mathématiques, 29(3), 305-334.
4. Artigue, M. (2013). Didactic engineering in mathematics education. In, S. Lerman (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education: Springer Reference (www. springerreference. com). Berlin: Springer.
5. Artigue M., Bosch, M., & Gascón J. (2011). Research praxeologies and networking theories. In, M. Pytlak, T. Rowlad, & E. Swoboda (Eds). Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 281-290). Rzeszów: University of Rzeszów.
6. Artigue, M. (coord.) (2006). Integrative theoretical framework. ReMath Deliverable 1. IST4-26751. http://www. remath. cti. gr. Accessed 26 Nov 2013.
7. Artigue, M. (coord.) (2009c). Integrative theoretical framework. ReMath Deliverable 18. IST4-26751. http://www. remath. cti. gr.
8. Bartolini Bussi, M. G., & Mariotti, M. A. (2008). Semiotic mediation in the mathematics classroom: Artifacts and signs after a Vygotskian perspective. In L. English, M. Bartolini Bussi, G. Jones, R. Lesh, & D. Tirosh (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education, second revised edition (pp. 746-805). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
9. Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., Dreyfus, T., Kidron, I, Arzarello, F., Radford, L., Artigue, M., & Sabena, C. (2010). Networking of theories in mathematics education. In, Pinto, M. M. F. & Kawasaki, T. F. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 34th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 1, pp. 145-175). Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
10. Brousseau, G. (1997). Theory of didactical situations in mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
11. Chevallard, Y. (1992). Concepts fondamentaux de la didactique. Perspectives apportées par une approche anthropologique. [Fundamental concepts of didactics. Perspectives provided by an anthropological approach]. Recherche en didactique des Mathématiques, 12(1), 73-112.
12. Chevallard, Y. & Sensevy, G. (2013). Anthropological approaches in mathematics education, French perspectives. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education: springerreference (www. springerreference. com). Berlin: Springer.
13. Duval, R. (1995). Sémiosis et pensée humaine [Semiosis and human thinking]. Bern: Peter Lang.
14. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Falcade, R (2006) Théorie des Situations, médiation sémiotique et discussions collectives dans des séquences d'enseignement qui utilisent Cabri-géomètre et qui visent à l'apprentissage des notions de fonction et graphe de fonction. [Theory of didactic situations, semiotic mediation and collective discussions in teaching sequences involving the use of Cabri-géomètre and aiming at the learning of function and graphs]. Thèse de doctorat. Université de Grenoble 1.
16. Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.
17. Harel, G., & Papert, S. (Eds.). (1991). Constructionism. Norwood: Ablex.
18. Kafai, Y., & Resnick, M. (Eds.). (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking and learning in a digital world. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Lagrange, J. B. (2000). L'intégration d'instruments informatiques dans l'enseignement: Une approche par les techniques. [The integration of computer tools in education: An approach through techniques]. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 43(1), 1-30.
20. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
21. Leont'ev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
22. Maracci M., Cazes, C., Vandebrouck, F., & Mariotti, M. A. (2009); Casyopée in the classroom: Two different theory-driven pedagogical approaches. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne & F. Arzarello (Eds) Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. (pp. 1399-1408). Lyon: Service des publications, INRP.
23. Maracci, M., Cazes, C., Vandebrouck, F., & Mariotti, M. A. (2013). Synergies between theoretical approaches to mathematics education with technology: A case study through a cross-analysis methodology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(3), 461-485.
24. Mariotti M. A. Maracci M. & Saberna (coords) (2007) Research design ReMath Deliverable 11. IST4-26751. http://www. remath. cti. gr. Accessed 26 Nov 2013.
25. Mariotti M. A. & Maracci M. (coords) (2007) Design-based research: Process and results ReMath Deliverable 13. IST4-26751. http://www. remath. cti. gr. Accessed 26 Nov 2013.
26. Niss, M. (2007). Reflections on the state and trends in research on mathematics teaching and learning: From here to utopia. In F. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1293-1311). Greenwich, Connecticut: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
27. Peirce, C. S. (1931/1958). Collected papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
28. Prediger, S., Bikner-Ahsbahs, A., & Arzarello, F. (2008). Networking strategies and methods for connecting theoretical approaches: First steps towards a conceptual framework. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 165-178.
29. Rabardel, P. (1995): Les hommes and les technologies. Approche cognitive des instruments contemporains.[Technologies and human beings. A cognitive approach to contemporary instruments]. Paris: A. Colin.
30. Radford, L. (2008). Connecting theories in mathematics education: Challenges and possibilities. ZDM - The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(2), 317-327.
31. Sriraman, B., & English, L. (Eds.). (2010). Theories of mathematics education. Seeking new frontiers. New York: Springer.
32. Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, "translations" and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387-420.
33. TELMA ERT (2006). Developing a joint methodology for comparing the influence of different theoretical frameworks in technology enhanced learning in mathematics: The TELMA approach. In Le Hung Son, N. Sinclair, J.-B. Lagrange & C. Hoyles (eds.) Proceedings of the ICMI 17 Study Conference: Background papers for the ICMI 17 Study. (2, pp. 46-55). Hanoï: Hanoï University of Technology.
34. Vérillon, P., & Rabardel, P. (1995). Cognition and artifacts: A contribution to the study of thought in relation to instrumented activity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 10(1), 77-101.
35. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.