Public management in time: A longitudinal examination of the full range of leadership theory

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 407-429

  Oberfield, Zachary W ^a  

^a HAVERFORD COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897535959     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mus060     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Adcock, R., and D. Collier. 2001. Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review 95:529-46.
2. Barnard, C. 1968. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. Bass, B. 1996. Is there universality in the full range model of leadership? International Journal of Public Administration 19:731-61.
3. Behn, R. 2006. Performance leadership: 11 better practices that can ratchet up performance. Washington, DC: IBM Center for the Business of Government.
4. Boyne, G., and R. Walker. 2002. Total quality management and performance: An evaluation of the evidence and lessons for research on public organizations. Public Performance & Management Review 26:111-31.
5. Brehm, J., and S. Gates. 1997. Working, shirking, and sabotage: Bureaucratic response to a democratic public. Ann Arbor: Univ. of Michigan Press.
6. Brewer, G. 2006. All measures of performance are subjective: More evidence on U.S. federal agencies. In Public service performance: Perspectives on measurement and management, eds. G. Boyne, K. Meier, L. OToole, and R. Walker. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
7. Burns, J. 1978. Leadership. New York: Harper Collins. Choi, S. 2009. Diversity in the US federal government: Diversity management and employee turnover in federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19:603-30.
8. Choi, S., and H. Rainey. 2010. Managing diversity in U.S. federal agencies: Effects of diversity and diversity management on employee perceptions of organizational performance. Public Administration Review 70:109-21.
9. Curran, P., S. West, and J. Finch. 1996. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in CFA. Psychological Methods 1:16-29.
10. Fernandez, S. 2005. Developing and testing an integrative framework of public sector leadership: Evidence from the public education arena. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:197-217.
11. Fornell, C., and D. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18:39-50.
12. Frederickson, H., K. Smith, C. Larimer, and M. Licari. 2012. The public administration theory primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
13. Hall, Richard H. 1977. Organizations: Structure and process, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
14. Hirschman, A. 1970. Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
15. Hooper, D., J. Coughlan, and M. Mullen. 2008. Structural equation modeling. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods 6:53-60.
16. Ingraham, P., P. Joyce, and A. Donahue. 2003. Government performance: Why management matters. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
17. Kaufman, H. 1975. The limits of organizational change. Tuscaloosa, AL: Univ. of Alabama Press.
18. Kim, S. 2002. Participative management and job satisfaction: Lessons for management leadership. Public Administration Review 62:231-41.
19. Kingdon, J. 2002. Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Longman Publishing Group.
20. Lipsky, M. 1980. Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
21. Lowe, K., K. Kroeck, and N. Sivasubramaniam. 1996. Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. The Leadership Quarterly 7:385-425.
22. March, J., and J. Olsen. 1984. The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. American Political Science Review 78:734-49.
23. -. 2010. Logic of appropriateness. In The Oxford handbook of American bureaucracy, ed. R. Durant. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
24. Marks, M., J. Mathieu, and S. Zaccaro. 2001. A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. The Academy of Management Review 26:356-76.
25. Mead, L. 2004. Government matters: Welfare reform in Wisconsin. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
26. Meier, K., L. OToole, G. Boyne, and R. Walker. 2007. Strategic management and the performance of public organizations: Testing venerable ideas against recent theories. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 17:357-77.
27. Merton, R. 1940. Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces 18:560-8.
28. Milton, L., and J. Westphal. 2005. Identity confirmation networks and cooperation in work groups. Academy of Management Journal 48:191-212.
29. Moynihan, D. 2007. The reality of results: Managing for results in state and local government. In In pursuit of performance: Management systems in state and local government, ed. P. Ingraham. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press.
30. Moynihan, D., and S. Pandey. 2005. Testing how management matters in an era of government by performance management. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15:421-39.
31. Moynihan, D., S. Pandey, and B. Wright. 2012. Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22:143-64.
32. Nicholson, C. 2010. The Dodd-Frank Bill up close. The New York Times. http://dealbook.nytimes. com/2010/06/28/the-dodd-frank-bill-up-close/.
33. OToole, L., and K. Meier. 1999. Modeling the impact of public management: Implications of structural context. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 9:505-26.
34. -. 2003. Plusca change: Public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13:43-64.
35. Organ, D., and A. Lingl. 1995. Personality, satisfaction, and organizational citizenship behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology 135:339-50.
36. Paarlberg, L., and B. Lavigna. 2010. Transformational leadership and public service motivation: Driving individual and organizational performance. Public Administration Review 70:710-8.
37. Perry, J., and N. Buckwalter. 2010. The public service of the future. Public Administration Review 70:s238-45.
38. Pitts, D. 2009. Diversity management, job satisfaction, and performance: Evidence from U.S. federal agencies. Public Administration Review 69:328-38.
39. Posner, R. 2005. Preventing surprise attacks: Intelligence reform in the wake of 9/11. New York: Rowman &Littlefield.
40. Rago, W. 1994. Adapting total quality management (TQM) to government: Another point of view. Public Administration Review 54:61-64.
41. Rainey, H. 2003. Understanding and managing public organizations, 3rd ed. New York: Jossey-Bass.
42. Reisner, R. 2011. A leaders guide to transformation: Developing a playbook for successful change initiatives. IBM Center for the Business of Government.
43. Riccucci, N. 2005. How management matters: Street-level bureaucrats and welfare reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press.
44. Riggio, R. 2009. Are you a transformational leader? Psychology Today. http://www.psychologytoday. com/.
45. Scott, W. 2003. Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems. Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
46. Simon, H. 1997. Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations. New York: Free Press.
47. Smith, K., S. Carroll, and S. Ashford. 1995. Intra-and interorganizational cooperation: Toward a research agenda. Academy of Management Journal 38:7-23.
48. Swiss, J. 1992. Adapting total quality management (TQM) to government. Public Administration Review 52:356-62.
49. Trottier, T., M. Van Wart, and X. Wang. 2008. Examining the nature and significance of leadership in government organizations. Public Administration Review 68:319-33.
50. US Office of Personnel Management (OPM). 2009. Introduction to the position classification standards. Washington, DC: OPM
51. -. 2012. Federal employee viewpoint survey: What is the FedView survey? http://www.fedview. opm.gov/2011/.
52. Van Wart, M. 2003. Public-sector leadership theory: An assessment. Public Administration Review 63:214-28.
53. Vigoda-Gadot, E., and I. Beeri. 2012. Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in public administration: The power of leadership and the cost of organizational politics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22:573-96.
54. Weber, M., trans. T. Parsons. 1947. The theory of social and economic organization. New York: Free Press.
55. Williamson, V., T. Skocpol, and J. Coggin. 2011. The tea party and the remaking of republican conservatism. Perspectives on Politics 9:25-43.
56. Wilson, J. 1989. Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books.
57. Wright, B., and B. Davis. 2003. Job satisfaction in the public sector. The American Review of Public Administration 33:70-90.
58. Wright, B., D. Moynihan, and S. Pandey. 2012. Pulling the levers: Transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Administration Review 72:206-15.
59. Wright, B., and S. Pandey. 2010. Transformational leadership in the public sector: Does structure matter? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20:75-89.