Risk factors in patient safety: Minimally invasive surgery versus conventional surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 350-356

  Rodrigues, Sharon P ^a   Wever, Aurystella M ^a   Dankelman, Jenny ^b   Jansen, Frank W ^a,b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Minimally invasive surgery; Patient safety; Risk factor; Safety; Surgery; Systems approach

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PATIENT SAFETY; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; RISK FACTOR; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; SURGICAL TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 84857037681     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1874-z     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldsen MS (1999) To err is human: building a safer health system. National Academy Press, Washington
2. De Bruijne MC, Zegers M, Hoonhout LH, Wagner C (2007) Onbedoelde schade in Nederlandse ziekenhuizen. Dossieronderzoek van ziekenhuisopnames in 2004. EMGO Instituut/VUmc en NIVEL, Amsterdam/Utrecht
3. EN de Vries MA Ramrattan SM Smorenburg DJ Gouma MA Boermeester 2008 The incidence and nature of in-hospital adverse events: a systematic review Qual Saf Health Care 3 216 223 10.1136/qshc.2007.023622
4. Inspectie voor de gezondheidszorg (2007) Risico's minimaal invasieve chirurgie onderschat, kwaliteitssysteem voor laparoscopische operaties ontbreekt. IGZ, Den Haag
5. J Dankelman CA Grimbergen 2005 Systems approach to reduce errors in surgery Surg Endosc 8 1017 1021 10.1007/s00464-005-8109-0 (Pubitemid 41494815)
6. JF Calland S Guerlain RB Adams CG Tribble E Foley EG Chekan 2002 A systems approach to surgical safety Surg Endosc 6 1005 1014 10.1007/s00464-002- 8509-3 (Pubitemid 34592011)
7. C Vincent K Moorthy SK Sarker A Chang AW Darzi 2004 Systems approaches to surgical quality and safety: from concept to measurement Ann Surg 4 475 482 10.1097/01.sla.0000118753.22830.41 (Pubitemid 38372763)
8. PA Leake DR Urbach 2010 Measuring processes of care in general surgery: assessment of technical and nontechnical skills Surg Innov 17 4 332 339 20798082 10.1177/1553350610379426
9. DM Herron M Gagner TL Kenyon LL Swanstrom 2001 The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century: a discussion of critical design elements Surg Endosc 4 415 422 10.1007/s004640080134 (Pubitemid 32385199)
10. TA Kenyon DR Urbach JB Speer B Waterman-Hukari GF Foraker PD Hansen LL Swanstrom 2001 Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency Surg Endosc 10 1140 1143 10.1007/s004640080092 (Pubitemid 32929165)
11. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (1994) Report of the RCOG working party on training in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. RCOG, London
12. AB Haynes TG Weiser WR Berry SR Lipsitz AH Breizat EP Dellinger T Herbosa S Joseph PL Kibatala MC Lapitan AF Merry K Moorthy RK Reznick B Taylor AA Gawande 2009 A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population N Engl J Med 360 5 491 499 19144931 10.1056/NEJMsa0810119 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXht1Wku7w%3D
13. EG Verdaasdonk LP Stassen M van der Elst TM Karsten J Dankelman 2007 Problems with technical equipment during laparoscopic surgery: an observational study Surg Endosc 2 275 279 10.1007/s00464-006-0019-2 (Pubitemid 46122417)
14. EN de Vries HA Prins RM Crolla AJ den Outer G van Andel SH van Helden WS Schlack MA van Putten DJ Gouma MG Dijkgraaf SM Smorenburg MA Boermeester 2010 Effect of a comprehensive surgical safety system on patient outcomes N Engl J Med 20 1928 1937 10.1056/NEJMsa0911535
15. EG Verdaasdonk LP Stassen WF Hoffmann M van der Elst J Dankelman 2008 Can a structured checklist prevent problems with laparoscopic equipment? Surg Endosc 10 2238 2243 10.1007/s00464-008-0029-3
16. RJ Lynch MJ Englesbe L Sturm A Bitar K Budhiraj S Kolla Y Polyachenko MG Duck DA Campbell Jr 2009 Measurement of foot traffic in the operating room: implications for infection control Am J Med Qual 1 45 52
17. K Moorthy Y Munz S Undre A Darzi 2004 Objective evaluation of the effect of noise on the performance of a complex laparoscopic task Surgery 1 25 30 10.1016/j.surg.2003.12.011 (Pubitemid 38834215)
18. JR Pluyter SN Buzink AF Rutkowski JJ Jakimowicz 2010 Do absorption and realistic distraction influence performance of component task surgical procedure? Surg Endosc 4 902 907 10.1007/s00464-009-0689-7
19. L Lingard G Regehr S Espin S Whyte 2006 A theory-based instrument to evaluate team communication in the operating room: balancing measurement authenticity and reliability Qual Saf Health Care 6 422 426 10.1136/qshc.2005. 015388 (Pubitemid 46025154)
20. L Lingard S Espin S Whyte G Regehr GR Baker R Reznick J Bohnen B Orser D Doran E Grober 2004 Communication failures in the operating room: an observational classification of recurrent types and effects Qual Saf Health Care 5 330 334 10.1136/qshc.2003.008425 (Pubitemid 39389393)
21. DA Wiegmann AW ElBardissi JA Dearani RC Daly TM Sundt III 2007 Disruptions in surgical flow and their relationship to surgical errors: an exploratory investigation Surgery 5 658 665 10.1016/j.surg.2007.07.034 (Pubitemid 350018854)
22. HM Parsons 1974 What happened at Hawthorne? New evidence suggests the Hawthorne effect resulted from operant reinforcement contingencies Science 4128 922 932 10.1126/science.183.4128.922