Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance

Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 495-518

  Choi, Taehyon ^a   Robertson, Peter J ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84897500875     PISSN: 10531858     EISSN: 14779803     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mut003     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Agranoff, Robert, and Michael McGuire. 1998. Multinetwork management: Collaboration and the hollow state in local economic policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 8:67-91.
2. Ansell, Chris, and Alison Gash. 2008. Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18:543-71.
3. Arrow, Holly, Joseph E. McGrath, and Jennifer L. Berdahl. 2000. Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development and adaptation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4. Beierle, Thomas C. 2000. The quality of stakeholder-based decisions: Lessons from the case study record. Discussion Paper 00-56. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
5. Beierle, Thomas C., and David M. Konisky. 2001. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environment and Planning C 19:515-28.
6. Blatner, Keith A., Matthew S. Carroll, Steven E. Daniels, and Greg B. Walker. 2001. Evaluating the application of collaborative learning to the Wenatchee fire recovery planning effort. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 21:241-70.
7. Booher, David E., and Judith E. Innes. 2002. Network power in collaborative planning. Journal of Planning Education and Research 21:221-36.
8. Bouwen, Rene, and Tharsi Taillieu. 2004. Multi-party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 14:137-53.
9. Brodbeck, Felix C., Rudolf Kerschreiter, Andreas Mojzisch, and Stefan Schulz-Hardt. 2007. Group decision making under conditions of distributed knowledge: The information asymmetries model. Academy of Management Review 32:459-79.
10. Bryson, John M., and Barbara C. Crosby. 1992. Leadership for the common good. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
11. Bryson, John M., Barbara C. Crosby, and Melissa Middleton Stone. 2006. The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review 66:44-55.
12. Buchanan, James M., and Gordon Tullock. 1962. The calculus of consent: Logical foundations of constitutional democracy. Ann Arbor, MA: Univ. of Michigan Press.
13. Bull, Richard, Judith Petts, and James Evans. 2008. Social learning from public engagement: Dreaming the impossible? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 51:701-16.
14. Chambers, Simone. 2003. Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science 6:307-26.
15. Coglianese, Cary, and Laurie K. Allen. 2003. Building sector-based consensus: A review of the EPAs Common Sense Initiative. Paper 107. Scholarship at Penn Law.
16. Connick, Sarah. 2006. Sacramento Area Water Forum: A case study. IURD working paper series 2006-06. Berkeley, CA: Univ. of California.
17. Davis, James H., Norbert L. Kerr, Robert S. Atkin, Robert Holt, and David Meek. 1975. The decision processes of 6-and 12-person mock juries assigned unanimous and two-thirds majority rules. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 32:1-14.
18. Downs, Anthony. 1961. Problems of majority voting: In defense of majority voting. The Journal of Political Economy 69:192-99.
19. Dryzek, John S. 1990. Discursive democracy. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press.
20. Emerson, Kirk, Tina Nabatchi, and Stephen Balogh. 2012. An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22:1-29.
21. Feddersen, Timothy, and Wolfgang Pesendorfer. 1998. Convicting the innocent: The inferiority of unanimous jury verdicts under strategic voting. American Political Science Review 92:23-35.
22. Feldman, Martha S., and Anne M. Khademian. 2007. The role of the public manager in inclusion: Creating communities of participation. Governance 20:305-24.
23. Folger, Robert, and Mary A. Konovsky. 1989. Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to pay raise decisions. Academy of Management Journal 32:115-30.
24. Fossett, James, and Frank J. Thompson. 2005. Administrative responsiveness to the disadvantaged: The case of Childrens Health Insurance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16:369-92.
25. Fung, Archon, and Erik OlinWright. 2003. Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
26. Futrell, Robert. 2003. Technical adversarialism and participatory collaboration in the U.S. Chemical Weapons Disposal Program. Science, Technology, and Human Values 28:451-82.
27. Gerlak, Andrea K., and Tanya Heikkila. 2011. Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades Restoration Program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21:619-44.
28. Glasser, Michael H. 1997. Letting the supermajority rule: Nonunanimous jury verdicts in criminal trials. Florida State University Law Review 24:659-77.
29. Gray, Barbara. 1997. Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
30. Habermas, Jurgen. 1998. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Harrison, J. Richard, Zhiang Lin, Glenn R. Carroll, and Kathleen M. Carley. 2007. Simulation modeling in organizational and management research. Academy of Management Review 32:1229-45.
32. Huxham, Chris, and Nic Beech. 2008. Inter-organizational power. In The Oxford handbook of interorganizational relations, ed. Steve Cropper, Chris Huxham, Mark Ebers, and Peter Smith Ring, 555-79. New York: Oxford Univ. Press.
33. Huxham, Chris, and Siv E. Vangen. 2005. Managing to collaborate: The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. New York: Routledge.
34. Imperial, Mark T. 2005. Using collaboration as a governance strategy. Administration and Society 37:281-320.
35. Innes, Judith E., and David E. Booher. 2010. Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. New York: Routledge.
36. Kameda, Tatsuya. 1991. Procedural influence in small-group decision making: Deliberation style and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61:245-56.
37. Kaplan, Martin F., and Charles E. Miller. 1987. Group decision making and normative versus informational influence: Effects of type of issue and assigned decision rule. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:306-13.
38. Levitt, Raymond E. 2004. Computational modeling of organizations comes of age. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory 10:127-45.
39. List, Christian. 2007. Deliberation and agreement. In Deliberation, participation and democracy: Can the people govern? ed. S. W. Rosenberg. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
40. Mandell, Myrna P. 1999. Community collaborations: Working through network structures. Policy Studies Review 16:42-64.
41. Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond adversary democracy. Chicago, IL: Univ. of Chicago Press.
42. McFarlin, Dean B., and Paul D. Sweeney. 1992. Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal 35:626-37.
43. McGann, A. J. 2002. The tyranny of the super-majority: How majority rule protects minorities. Irvine, CA: Center for the Study of Democracy. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/18b448r6 (accessed October 4, 2012).
44. McGuire, Michael. 2006. Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review 66:33-43.
45. Mendelberg, Tali. 2002. The deliberative citizen: Theory and evidence. In Research in micropolitics: Political decision making, deliberation and participation, 6th ed., ed. Michael X. Delli Carpini
46. Leonie Huddy and Robert Shapiro, 151-93. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
47. Miller, Charles E. 1985. Group decision making under majority and unanimity decision rules. Social Psychology Quarterly 48:51-61.
48. Miller, John H., and Scott E. Page. 2007. Complex adaptive systems. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
49. Moynihan, Donald P. 2005. Leveraging collaborative networks in infrequent emergency situations. Washington, DC: IBM Center of Business and Government.
50. Murdock, Barbara S., Carol Wiessner, and Ken Sexton. 2005. Stakeholder participation in voluntary environmental agreements: Analysis of 10 Project XL case studies. Science, Technology, and Human Values 30:223-50.
51. Mutz, Diana. 2008. Is deliberative democracy a falsifiable theory? Annual Review of Political Science 11:521-38.
52. Newman, Janet, Marian Barnes, Helen Sullivan, and Andrew Knops. 2004. Public participation and collaborative governance. Journal of Social Policy 33:203-23.
53. Ohtsubo, Yohsuke, Charles E. Miller, Nahoko Hayashi, and Ayumi Masuchi. 2004. Effects of group decision rules on decisions involving continuous alternatives: The unanimity rule and extreme decisions in mock civil juries. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40:320-31.
54. Rae, Douglas W. 1975. The limits of consensual decision making. American Political Science Review 69:1270-94.
55. Reilly, Thom. 2001. Collaboration in action: An uncertain process. Administration in Social Work 25:53-74.
56. Rethemeyer, R. Karl, and Deneen M. Hatmaker. 2008. Network management reconsidered: An inquiry into management of network structures in public sector service provision. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18:617-46.
57. Roberts, Nancy C. 2002. Keeping public officials accountable through dialogue: Resolving the accountability paradox. Public Administration Review 62:658-69.
58. Robertson, Peter J., and Taehyon Choi. 2012. Deliberation, consensus, and stakeholder satisfaction: A simulation of collaborative governance. Public Management Review 14:83-103.
59. Saarikoski, Heli. 2000. Environmental impact assessment (EIA) as collaborative learning process. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20:681-700.
60. Schelling, Thomas C. 1971. Dynamic models of segregation. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 1:143-86.
61. Smith, Eliot R., and Frederica Conrey. 2007. Agent-based modeling: A new approach for theory building in social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review 11:87-104.
62. Stasser, Garold. 2000. Information distribution, participation, and group decision: Explorations with the DISCUSS and SPEAK models. In Computational modeling of behavior in organizations: The third scientific discipline, ed. Daniel R. Ilgen and Charles L. Hulin, 135-56. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
63. Sun, Ron. 2008. Theoretical status of computational cognitive modeling. Cognitive Systems Research 10:124-40.
64. Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. Deliberative democratic theory and empirical political science. Annual Review of Political Science 11:497-520.
65. Thomson, Ann Marie, and James L. Perry. 2006. Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review 66:20-32.
66. Till, John E., and Kathleen R. Meyer. 2001. Public involvement in science and decision making. Health Physics 80:370-78.
67. Weisbord, Marvin R. 1992. Discovering common ground. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
68. Wittenbaum, Gwen M., Andrea B. Hollingshead, and Isabel C. Botero. 2004. From cooperative to motivated information sharing in groups: Moving beyond the hidden profile paradigm. Communication Monographs 71:286-310.