Using latent class analysis to identify participant typologies in a drug treatment court

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 75-82

  Larsen, Jessica L ^a   Nylund Gibson, Karen ^a   Cosden, Merith ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Drug court; LCA; Recidivism; Risks; Typologies

Indexed keywords

ADDICTION SEVERITY INDEX; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRIMINAL BEHAVIOR; DEMOGRAPHY; EDUCATION; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MOTIVATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBATION; RECIDIVISM; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES; ADDICTION; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MANDATORY PROGRAM; MIDDLE AGED; OFFENDER; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PSYCHOLOGY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICAL MODEL; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CALIFORNIA; CRIMINALS; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; EMPLOYMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; JUDICIAL ROLE; MANDATORY PROGRAMS; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84897474974     PISSN: 03768716     EISSN: 18790046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2014.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Amaro H., Chernoff M., Brown V., Arevalo S., Gatz M. Does integrated trauma-informed substance abuse treatment increase treatment retention?. J. Comp. Psychol. 2007, 35:845-862.
2. Andrews D.A., Bonta J. The Psychology of Criminal Conduct 2010, Lexis Nexis, New Providence, NJ. 5th ed.
3. Banks D., Gottfredson D.C. Participation in drug treatment court and time to rearrest. Justice Q. 2004, 21:637-658.
4. Blanco C., Xu Y., Brady K., Pérez-Fuentes G., Okuda M., Wang S. Comorbidity of posttraumatic stress disorder with alcohol dependence among US adults: results from National Epidemiological Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 132:630-638.
5. Brewster M.P. An evaluation of the Chester County (PA) drug court program. J. Drug Issues 2001, 31:177-206.
6. Brown R.T., Allison P.A., Nieto F.J. Impact of jail sanctions during drug court participation upon substance abuse treatment completion. Addiction 2010, 106:135-142.
7. Clark C., Young M.S. Outcomes of mandated treatment for women with histories of abuse and co-occurring disorders. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2009, 37:346-352.
8. Cosden M., Basch J.E., Campos E., Greenwell A., Barazani S., Walker S. Effects of motivation and problem severity on court-based drug treatment. Crime Delinq. 2006, 52:599-618.
9. DeMatteo D. A proposed prevention intervention for nondrug-dependent drug court clients. J. Cogn. Psychother. 2011, 24:104-115.
10. DeMatteo D., Marlowe D.B., Festinger D.S. Secondary prevention services for clients who are low-risk in drug court: a conceptual model. Crime Delinq. 2006, 52:114-134.
11. DeMatteo D., Marlowe D.B., Festinger D.S., Arabia P.L. Outcome trajectories in drug court: do all participants have serious drug problems?. Crim. Justice Behav. 2009, 36:354-368.
12. Downey P.M., Roman J.K. A Bayesian Meta-Analysis of Drug Court Cost-Effectiveness 2010, Urban Institute, Washington, DC.
13. Ehlers C., Gizer I., Gilder D., Ellingson J., Yehuda R. Measuring historical trauma in an American Indian community sample: contributions of substance dependence, affective disorder, conduct disorder and PTSD. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013, 133:180-187.
14. Farley M., Golding J., Young G., Mulligan M., Minkoff J. Trauma history and relapse probability among patients seeking substance abuse treatment. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2004, 27:161-167.
15. Gottfredson D., Najaka S.S., Kearley B. Effectiveness of drug treatment courts: evidence from a randomized trial. Criminol. Public Policy 2003, 2:171-196.
16. Harrison L.D., Scarpitti F.R. Introduction: progress and issues in drug treatment courts. Subst. Use Misuse 2002, 37:1441-1467.
17. Hartley R.E., Phillips R.C. Who graduates from drug courts? Correlates of client success. Am. J. Crim. Justice 2001, 26:107-119.
18. Hser Y., Huang D., Teruya C., Anglin M.D. Diversity of drug abuse treatment utilization patterns and outcomes. Eval. Program Plann. 2004, 27:309-319.
19. Huddleston W., Marlowe D.B. Painting the Current Picture: A National Report on Drug Courts and Other Problem-Solving Court Program in the United States 2011, National Drug Court Institute, Alexandria, VA.
20. Jensen E., Mosher C. Adult drug courts: emergence, growth, outcome evaluations, and the need for a continuum of care. Ida. Law Rev. 2006, 42:443-470.
21. Kratzer L., Hodgins S. A typology of offenders: a test of Moffitt's theory among males and females from childhood to age 30. Crim. Behav. Ment. Health 1999, 9:57-73.
22. Lanza S.T., Rhoades B.L. Latent class analysis: an alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prevent. Sci. 2011, Retrieved from http://link.springer.com. 10.1007/s11121-011-0201-1.
23. Leonhard C., Mulvey K., Gastfriend D., Schwartz M. The Addiction Severity Index: a field study of internal consistency and validity. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 2000, 18:129-135.
24. Leukefeld C., McDonald H.S., Staton M., Mateyoke-Scriver A., Webster M., Logan T.K., Garrity T. An employment intervention for drug-abusing offenders. Fed. Probat. 2003, 37:27-31.
25. Little R.L., Rubin D.B. Statistical Analysis with Missing Data 1990, Wiley, New York.
26. Listwan S.J., Shaffer D.K., Hartman J.L. Combating methamphetamine use in the community. Crime Delinq. 2009, 55:627-644.
27. Listwan S.J., Sundt J.L., Holsinger A.M., Latessa E.J. The effect of drug court programming on recidivism: the Cincinnati experience. Crime Delinq. 2003, 49:389-411.
28. Marlowe D.B. Alternative tracks in adult drug courts: matching your program to the needs of your clients. Drug Court Rev. 2012, 7:1-11.
29. Marlowe D.B., Festinger D.S., Lee P.A. The role of judicial status hearing in drug court. Offend. Subst. Abuse Rep. 2003, 3:33-46.
30. Marlowe D.B., Festinger D.S., Dugosh K.L., Lee P.A., Benasutti K.M. Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: discharge and six-month outcomes from a prospective matching study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007, 88:S4-S13.
31. Masyn K.E. Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology 2013, Oxford University Press, Oxford. T. Little (Ed.).
32. McLachlan G.J., Peel D. Finite Mixture Models 2000, Wiley, New York, NY.
33. McLellan A.T., Kushner H., Metzger D., Peters R., Smith I., Grissom G., Pettinati H., Argeriou M. The fifth edition of the Addiction Severity Index. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1992, 9:199-213.
34. Muthén B., Asparouhov T. Item response mixture modeling: application to tobacco dependence criteria. Addict. Behav. 2006, 31:1050-1066.
35. Muthén B., Asparouhov T. Wald test of mean equality for potential latent class predictors in mixture modelling 2010, Retrieved from: http://www.statmodel.com/techappen.shtml.
36. Muthén L.K., Muthén B.O. Mplus User's Guide 1998-2010, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA. 6th ed.
37. Najavits L.M. Seeking Safety: A Treatment Manual for PTSD and Substance Abuse 2002, Guildford Press, New York.
38. National Association of Drug Court Professionals Defining Drug Courts: The Key Components 1997, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC.
39. Nylund K.L., Asparouhov T., Muthén B.O. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct. Eq. Model. 2007, 14:535-569.
40. Nylund-Gibson K.L., Masyn K.E. Including auxiliary variables in latent class analysis. Symposium conducted at the 91st Annual Meeting of the Western Psychological Association 2011.
41. Office of Justice Programs Drug Court Clearinghouse and Technical Assistance Project Summary of Drug Court Activity by State and County 2009, Retrieved from http://www1.spa.american.edu/justice/documents/2150.pdf.
42. Peters R.H., Murrin M.R. Effectiveness of treatment-based drug courts in reducing criminal recidivism. Crim. Justice Behav. 2000, 27:72-96.
43. Rawson R.A., Shoptaw S.J., Obert J.L., McCann M.J., Hasson A.L., Marinelli-Casey P.J., Brethen P.R., Ling W. An intensive outpatient approach for cocaine abuse treatment: the Matrix Model. J. Subst. Abuse Treat. 1995, 12:117-127.
44. Rawson R.A., Obert J.L., McCann M.J., Ling W. The Matrix Model Intensive Outpatient Alcohol and Drug Treatment Program: A 16 week Individualized Program 2005, Hazelden, Center City, Minnesota.
45. Reynolds M., Mezey G., Chapman M., Wheeler M., Drummond C., Baldacchino A. Co-morbid post-traumatic stress disorder in a substance misusing clinical population. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2005, 77:251-258.
46. Rubin D.B. Multiple Imputation for Survey Nonresponse 1987, Wiley, New York.
47. Schartz G. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 1978, 6:461-464.
48. Shaffer D.K. Looking inside the black box of drug courts: a meta-analytic review. Justice Q. 2011, 28:493-521.
49. Wasserman L. Bayesian model selection and model averaging. J. Math. Psychol. 2000, 44:92-107.
50. Wilson D.B., Mitchell O., MacKenzie D.L. A systematic review of drug court effects on recidivism. J. Exp. Criminol. 2006, 2:459-487.