Orchestration of plant defense systems: Genes to populations

Trends in Plant Science

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 250-255

  Kliebenstein, Daniel J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARABIDOPSIS; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PROCEDURES; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

ARABIDOPSIS; CIRCADIAN CLOCKS; PLANTS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

EID: 84897452955     PISSN: 13601385     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.01.003     Document Type: Review

References (85)

1. Lundberg D.S., et al. Defining the core Arabidopsis thaliana root microbiome. Nature 2012, 488:86-90.
2. Kliebenstein D.J. Plant defense compounds: systems approaches to metabolic analysis. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2012, 50:155-173.
3. Hansen B.G., et al. Identifying the molecular basis of QTLs: eQTLs add a new dimension. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:72-77.
4. Nour-Eldin H.H., et al. NRT/PTR transporters are essential for translocation of glucosinolate defence compounds to seeds. Nature 2012, 488:531-534.
5. Andersen T.G., et al. Integration of biosynthesis and long-distance transport establish organ-specific glucosinolate profiles in vegetative Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:3133-3145.
6. Wang W., et al. Timing of plant immune responses by a central circadian regulator. Nature 2011, 470:110-114.
7. Windram O., et al. Arabidopsis defense against Botrytis cinerea: chronology and regulation deciphered by high-resolution temporal transcriptomic analysis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3530-3557.
8. Bidart-Bouzat M.G., Kliebenstein D. An ecological genomic approach challenging the paradigm of differential plant responses to specialist versus generalist insect herbivores. Oecologia 2011, 167:677-689.
9. Reymond P., et al. A conserved transcript pattern in response to a specialist and a generalist herbivore. Plant Cell 2004, 16:3132-3147.
10. Gouhier-Darimont C., et al. Signalling of Arabidopsis thaliana response to Pieris brassicae eggs shares similarities with PAMP-triggered immunity. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64:665-674.
11. Thilmony R., et al. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana interaction with the plant pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 and the human pathogen Escherichia coli O157: H7. Plant J. 2006, 46:34-53.
12. Jones J.D.G., Dangl J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444:323-329.
13. De Vos M., et al. Signal signature and transcriptome changes of Arabidopsis during pathogen and insect attack. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2005, 18:923-937.
14. Barah P., et al. Molecular signatures in Arabidopsis thaliana in response to insect attack and bacterial infection. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e58987.
15. Rowe H.C., et al. Deficiencies in jasmonate-mediated plant defense reveal quantitative variation in Botrytis cinerea pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6:e1000861.
16. Ali J.G., Agrawal A.A. Specialist versus generalist insect herbivores and plant defense. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17:293-302.
17. Opgen-Rhein R., Strimmer K. Learning causal networks from systems biology time course data: an effective model selection procedure for the vector autoregressive process. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:S3.
18. Wilkinson D.J. Stochastic modelling for quantitative description of heterogeneous biological systems. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 10:122-133.
19. Moscou M.J., et al. Quantitative and temporal definition of the Mla transcriptional regulon during barley-powdery mildew interactions. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 2011, 24:694-705.
20. Dubnau D., Losick R. Bistability in bacteria. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 61:564-572.
21. Veening J.W., et al. Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2008, 62:193-210.
22. Braun P., et al. Evidence for network evolution in an Arabidopsis interactome map. Science 2011, 333:601-607.
23. Mukhtar M.S., et al. Independently evolved virulence effectors converge onto hubs in a plant immune system network. Science 2011, 333:596-601.
24. Agrawal A.A., et al. Costs of induced responses and tolerance to herbivory in male and female fitness components of wild radish. Evolution 1999, 53:1093-1104.
25. Strauss S.Y., Agrawal A.A. The ecology and evolution of plant tolerance to herbivory. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1999, 14:179-185.
26. Karban R., Baldwin I.T. Induced Responses to Herbivory 1997, University of Chicago Press.
27. Bekaert M., et al. Metabolic and evolutionary costs of herbivory defense: systems biology of glucosinolate synthesis. New Phytol. 2012, 196:596-605.
28. Züst T., et al. Using knockout mutants to reveal the growth costs of defensive traits. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2011, 278:2598-2603.
29. Joseph B., et al. Hierarchical nuclear and cytoplasmic genetic architectures for plant growth and defense within Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:1929-1945.
30. Agrawal A.A. New synthesis: trade-offs in chemical ecology. J. Chem. Ecol. 2011, 37:230-231.
31. Kliebenstein D.J. New synthesis: regulatory evolution, the veiled world of chemical diversification. J. Chem. Ecol. 2013, 39:349.
32. Wild M., et al. The Arabidopsis DELLA RGA-LIKE3 Is a direct target of MYC2 and modulates jasmonate signaling responses. Plant Cell 2012, 24:3307-3319.
33. Nakata M., et al. A bHLH-type transcription factor, ABA-INDUCIBLE BHLH-TYPE TRANSCRIPTION FACTOR/JA-ASSOCIATED MYC2-LIKE1, acts as a repressor to negatively regulate jasmonate signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2013, 25:1641-1656.
34. Covington M.F., et al. Global transcriptome analysis reveals circadian regulation of key pathways in plant growth and development. Genome Biol. 2008, 9:R130.
35. Harmer S.L. The circadian system in higher plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60:357-377.
36. Bhardwaj V., et al. Defence responses of Arabidopsis thaliana to infection by Pseudomonas syringae are regulated by the circadian clock. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e26968.
37. Zhang C., et al. Crosstalk between the circadian clock and innate immunity in Arabidopsis. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003370.
38. Shin J., et al. TIME FOR COFFEE represses accumulation of the MYC2 transcription factor to provide time-of-day regulation of jasmonate signaling in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2470-2482.
39. Goodspeed D., et al. Arabidopsis synchronizes jasmonate-mediated defense with insect circadian behavior. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:4674-4677.
40. Navarro L., et al. DELLAs control plant immune responses by modulating the balance and salicylic acid signaling. Curr. Biol. 2008, 18:650-655.
41. Hou X., et al. DELLAs modulate jasmonate signaling via competitive binding to JAZs. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:884-894.
42. Hong G-J., et al. Arabidopsis MYC2 interacts with DELLA proteins in regulating sesquiterpene synthase gene expression. Plant Cell 2012, 24:2635-2648.
43. Lackman P., et al. Jasmonate signaling involves the abscisic acid receptor PYL4 to regulate metabolic reprogramming in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:5891-5896.
44. Pourcel L., et al. A chemical complementation approach reveals genes and interactions of flavonoids with other pathways. Plant J. 2013, 74:383-397.
45. Kerwin R.E., et al. Network quantitative trait loci mapping of circadian clock outputs identifies metabolic pathway-to-clock linkages in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2011, 23:471-485.
46. Wentzell A.M., et al. Linking metabolic QTLs with network and cis-eQTLs controlling biosynthetic pathways. PLoS Genet. 2007, 3:1687-1701.
47. Sønderby I.E., et al. A complex interplay of three R2R3 MYB transcription factors determines the profile of aliphatic glucosinolates in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153:348-363.
48. Hirai M., et al. Omics-based identification of Arabidopsis Myb transcription factors regulating aliphatic glucosinolate biosynthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2007, 104:6478-6483.
49. Arango D., et al. Molecular basis for the action of a dietary flavonoid revealed by the comprehensive identification of apigenin human targets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:E2153-E2162.
50. Chandran D., et al. Laser microdissection of Arabidopsis cells at the powdery mildew infection site reveals site-specific processes and regulators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:460-465.
51. Chandran D., et al. Host cell ploidy underlying the fungal feeding site is a determinant of powdery mildew growth and reproduction. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2013, 26:537-545.
52. Matthews B.F., et al. Molecular characterization of a soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines) homolog of unc-87. J. Nematol. 2004, 36:457-465.
53. Klink V.P., et al. Laser capture microdissection (LCM) and expression analyses of Glycine max (soybean) syncytium containing root regions formed by the plant pathogen Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode). Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 59:965-979.
54. Klink V.P., et al. Isolation of developmentally regulated genes using microarrays and laser capture microdissection (LCM) of Glycine max (soybean) syncytia formed by the plant pathogen Heterodera glycines (soybean cyst nematode). Plant Biol. 2006, 2006:276.
55. Mulema J.M.K., Denby K.J. Spatial and temporal transcriptomic analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana-Botrytis cinerea interaction. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012, 39:4039-4049.
56. Mulema J.M.K., et al. Proteomic analysis of the Arabidopsis thaliana-Botrytis cinerea interaction using two-dimensional liquid chromatography. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011, 10:17551-17563.
57. Kliebenstein D.J., et al. Secondary metabolites influence Arabidopsis/Botrytis interactions: variation in host production and pathogen sensitivity. Plant J. 2005, 44:25-36.
58. Glazebrook J. Contrasting mechanisms of defense against biotrophic and necrotrophic pathogens. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2005, 43:205-227.
59. Heil M., Bostock R.M. Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens in the context of induced plant defences. Ann. Bot. (Lond.) 2002, 89:503-512.
60. de Vos M., et al. Herbivore-Induced resistance against microbial pathogens in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142:352-363.
61. Sticher L., et al. Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1997, 35:235-270.
62. Pieterse C.M.J., et al. A novel signaling pathway controlling induced systemic resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 1998, 10:1571-1580.
63. van Loon L.C., et al. Systemic resistance induced by rhizosphere bacteria. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 1998, 36:453-483.
64. Cui J., et al. Pseudomonas syringae manipulates systemic plant defenses against pathogens and herbivores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005, 102:1791-1796.
65. Jung H.W., et al. Priming in systemic plant immunity. Science 2009, 324:89-91.
66. Chanda B., et al. Glycerol-3-phosphate is a critical mobile inducer of systemic immunity in plants. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:421-427.
67. Liu P-P., et al. Interconnection between methyl salicylate and lipid-based long-distance signaling during the development of systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis and tobacco. Plant Physiol. 2011, 155:1762-1768.
68. Shah J. Plants under attack: systemic signals in defence. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2009, 12:459-464.
69. Galweiler L., et al. Regulation of polar auxin transport by AtPIN1 in Arabidopsis vascular tissue. Science 1998, 282:2226-2230.
70. Serrano M., et al. Export of salicylic acid from the chloroplast requires the multidrug and toxin extrusion-like transporter EDS5. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162:1815-1821.
71. Chen L-Q., et al. Sugar transporters for intercellular exchange and nutrition of pathogens. Nature 2010, 468:527-532.
72. Chen L-Q., et al. Sucrose efflux mediated by SWEET proteins as a key step for phloem transport. Science 2012, 335:207-211.
73. Dawson R.F. Accumulation of nicotine in reciprocal grafts of tomato and tobacco. Am. J. Bot. 1942, 29:66-71.
74. Baldwin I.T. Jasmonate-induced responses are costly but benefit plants under attack in native populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95:8113-8118.
75. Baldwin I.T., Hamilton W. Jasmonate-induced responses of Nicotiana sylvestris results in fitness costs due to impaired competitive ability for nitrogen. J. Chem. Ecol. 2000, 26:915-952.
76. Farmer E.E., Ryan C.A. Interplant communication: airborne methyl jasmonate induces synthesis of proteinase-inhibitors in plant leaves. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1990, 87:7713-7716.
77. Fang S., et al. Genotypic recognition and spatial responses by rice roots. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2013, 110:2670-2675.
78. Maina G.G., et al. Intra-plant versus inter-plant root competition in beans: avoidance, resource matching or tragedy of the commons. Plant Ecol. 2002, 160:235-247.
79. Falik O., et al. Self/non-self discrimination in roots. J. Ecol. 2003, 91:525-531.
80. Dudley S.A., File A.L. Kin recognition in an annual plant. Biol. Lett. 2007, 3:435-438.
81. Cahill J.F., et al. Plants integrate information about nutrients and neighbors. Science 2010, 328:1657.
82. Babikova Z., et al. Underground signals carried through common mycelial networks warn neighbouring plants of aphid attack. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16:835-843.
83. Wentzell A.M., Kliebenstein D.J. Genotype, age, tissue, and environment regulate the structural outcome of glucosinolate activation. Plant Physiol. 2008, 147:415-428.
84. Kliebenstein D.J. Exploring the shallow end; estimating information content in transcriptomics studies. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3:213.
85. Joosen R.V.L., et al. Identifying genotype-by-environment interactions in the metabolism of germinating Arabidopsis seeds using generalized genetical genomics. Plant Physiol. 2013, 162:553-566.