Who uses physician-rating websites? differences in sociodemographic variables, psychographic variables, and health status of users and nonusers of physician-rating websites

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2014, Pages

  Terlutter, Ralf ^a   Bidmon, Sonja ^a   Röttl, Johanna ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KLAGENFURT   (Austria)

Author keywords

Digital literacy; Physician rating websites; Psychographic variables; Sociodemographic variables

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMATION SEEKING; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIAN; SOCIOECONOMICS; STANDARDS; UTILIZATION;

ADULT; COMPUTER LITERACY; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SEEKING BEHAVIOR; INTERNET; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICIANS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84897444553     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3145     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB. Do online reviews matter? -An empirical investigation of panel data. Decision Support Systems 2008 Nov;45(4):1007-1016 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1016/j.dss.2008.04.001] [Medline: 19087353]
2. O'Grady LA, Witteman H, Wathen CN. The experiential health information processing model: supporting collaborative web-based patient education. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2008;8:58 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-58] [Medline: 19087353]
3. López A, Detz A, Ratanawongsa N, Sarkar U. What patients say about their doctors online: A qualitative content analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2012 Jun;27(6):685-692 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1958-4] [Medline: 22215270]
4. Lagu T, Hannon NS, Rothberg MB, Lindenauer PK. Patients' evaluations of health care providers in the era of social networking: An analysis of physician-rating websites. J Gen Intern Med 2010 Sep;25(9):942-946 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s11606-010-1383-0] [Medline: 20464523]
5. Emmert M, Sander U, Esslinger AS, Maryschok M, Schöffski O. Public reporting in Germany: The content of physician rating websites. Methods Inf Med 2012 Nov;51(2):112-120. [doi: 10.3414/ME11-01-0045] [Medline: 22101427]
6. RateMDs. URL: http://www.ratemds.com [accessed 2014-03-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6NyIeuW8u]
7. Vitals. URL: http://www.vitals.com/[accessed 2014-03-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6NyIlRbi2]
8. ZocDoc. URL: http://www.zocdoc.com/[accessed 2014-03-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6NyIwWYr8]
9. jameda. URL: http://www.jameda.de/[accessed 2014-03-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6NyKNIw8f]
10. Emmert M, Sander U, Pisch F. Eight questions about physician-rating websites: A systematic review. J Med Internet Res 2013 Feb;15(2):e24 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2360] [Medline: 23372115]
11. Jain S. Googling ourselves-what physicians can learn from online rating sites. N Engl J Med 2010 Jan 7;362(1):6-7. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0903473] [Medline: 20054044]
12. Reimann S, Strech D. The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English-and German-language sites. BMC Health Serv Res 2010;10(1):332 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-332] [Medline: 21138579]
13. Kadry B, Chu LF, Kadry B, Gammas D, Macario A. Analysis of 4999 online physician ratings indicates that most patients give physicians a favorable rating. J Med Internet Res 2011 Nov;13(4):e95 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.1960] [Medline: 22088924]
14. Healthgrades. URL: http://www.healthgrades.com/[accessed 2014-03-10] [WebCite Cache ID 6NyJMG3C4]
15. Hopkins Tanne J. How patients rate doctors. BMJ 2008 Sep 30;337(sep30 1):a1408-a1408. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.a1408]
16. Gunter J. For better or, maybe, worse, patients are judging your care online. OBG Management 2011;23(3):48-51 [FREE Full text] [WebCite Cache]
17. Böcken J, Braun B, Landmann J. Gesundheitsmonitor 2009. Gesundheitsversorgung und Gestaltungsoptionen aus der Perspektive der Bevölkerung. 1st edition. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2009.
18. Kofahl AC, Nickel S, Trojan A. Arztsuche im Internet. In: Böcken J, Braun B, Landmann J, editors. Gesundheitsmonitor 2009. Gesundheitsversorgung und Gestaltungsoptionen aus der Perspektive der Bevölkerung. 1st edition. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung; 2009:38-58.
19. Ruppert, E. Jameda. 2011 May 04. GfK ermittelt: Jeder Vierte nutzt Arztempfehlungsportale URL: http://www.jameda.de/presse/pressemeldungen/? meldung=11 [accessed 2013-08-14] [WebCite Cache ID 6IrlvLi4s]
20. Emmert M, Meier F, Pisch F, Sander U. Physician choice making and characteristics associated with using physician-rating websites: cross-sectional study. J Med Internet Res 2013 Aug;15(8):e187 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2702] [Medline: 23985220]
21. Galizzi MM, Miraldo M, Stavropoulou C, Desai M, Jayatunga W, Joshi M, et al. Who is more likely to use doctor-rating websites, and why? A cross-sectional study in London. BMJ Open 2012;2(6):e001493 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001493] [Medline: 23148340]
22. Bacon N. Will doctor rating sites improve standards of care? Yes. BMJ 2009 Mar 17;338:b1030-b1030. [doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1030]
23. Dolan PL. American Medical News. 2008 Jun 23. Patients rarely use online ratings to pick physicians URL: http://www. amednews.com/article/20080623/ business/306239998/1/[accessed 2013-11-18] [WebCite Cache ID 6LDwMPPVc]
24. Black EW, Thompson LA, Saliba H, Dawson K, Black NM. An analysis of healthcare providers' online ratings. Inform Prim Care 2009;17(4):249-253. [Medline: 20359403]
25. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the world wide web: A systematic review. JAMA 2002;287(20):2691-2700. [Medline: 12020305]
26. Adams SA. Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: The reflexive patient and "share-your-experience" websites. Soc Sci Med 2011 Apr;72(7):1069-1076. [doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.001] [Medline: 21414701]
27. Greaves F, Pape UJ, Lee H, Smith DM, Darzi A, Majeed A, et al. Patients' ratings of family physician practices on the internet: usage and associations with conventional measures of quality in the English National Health Service. J Med Internet Res 2012 Oct;14(5):e146 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2280] [Medline: 23076301]
28. Gao GG, McCullough JS, Agarwal R, Jha AK. A changing landscape of physician quality reporting: Analysis of patients' online ratings of their physicians over a 5-year period. J Med Internet Res 2012 Feb;14(1):e38 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2003] [Medline: 22366336]
29. Hennig S, Etgeton S. Arztbewertungen im Internet -Wie lassen sich solide Informationen fuer Verbraucher und individueller Datenschutz in Uebereinstimmung bringen? Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 2011;35(12):841-845 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s11623-011-0199-3]
30. Schaefer C, Schwarz S. [Doctor rating sites: which of them find the best doctors in Germany?]. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2010 Jan;104(7):572-577. [doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.09.002] [Medline: 21095610]
31. Bundesärztekammer und Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. www.patienten-information.de. 2011. Gute Praxis Bewertungsportale: Qualitätsanforderungen für Arztbewertungsportale URL: http://www.aezq.de/mdb/edocs/pdf/info/gute-praxis-bewertungsportale.pdf/view? searchterm=gute%20praxis [accessed 2014-02-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6NcxtjAWa]
32. Strech D, Reimann S. Deutschsprachige Arztbewertungsportale. Der Status quo ihrer Bewertungskriterien, Bewertungstendenzen und Nutzung. Gesundheitswesen 2012 Aug;74(8-9):e61-e67. [doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1297254] [Medline: 22189671]
33. Fox S. Health topics: 80% of internet users look for health information online. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2011 Feb 01. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2011/PIP-Health- Topics.pdf [accessed 2013-11-18] [WebCite Cache ID 6LDw7oHGR]
34. Iverson SA, Howard KB, Penney BK. Impact of internet use on health-related behaviors and the patient-physician relationship: A survey-based study and review. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2008 Dec;108(12):699-711 [FREE Full text] [Medline: 19075034]
35. Rice RE. Influences, usage, and outcomes of Internet health information searching: multivariate results from the Pew surveys. Int J Med Inform 2006 Jan;75(1):8-28. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2005.07.032] [Medline: 16125453]
36. Umefjord G, Sandström H, Malker H, Petersson G. Medical text-based consultations on the Internet: A 4-year study. Int J Med Inform 2008 Feb;77(2):114-121. [doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.01.009] [Medline: 17317292]
37. Fox S. The social life of health information. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project; 2009 Jun. URL: http://www.pewinternet.org/ ~/media/Files/Reports/2009/PIP-Health-2009.pdf [accessed 2013-11-18] [WebCite Cache ID 6LDwgYcWO]
38. Eysenbach G. Improving the quality of Web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES). J Med Internet Res 2004 Sep 29;6(3):e34 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.6.3.e34] [Medline: 15471760]
39. Hobbs R. Digital and media literacy: A plan of action. A White Paper on the Digital and Media Literacy Recommendations of the Knight Commission on the Information Needs of Communities in a Democracy. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute; 2010. URL: http://www.knightcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/ Digital-and-Media-Literacy-A-Plan-of-Action. pdf [accessed 2014-03-25] [WebCite Cache ID 6OK3agzIa]
40. Norman CD, Skinner HA. eHealth Literacy: Essential Skills for Consumer Health in a Networked World. J Med Internet Res 2006 Jun;8(2):e9 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.8.2.e9] [Medline: 16867972]
41. FGW Forschungsgruppe Wahlen Telefonfeld GmbH. Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. Versichertenbefragung der Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung 2011 URL: http://www.kbv.de/versichertenbefragung2011.html [accessed 2014-02-24] [WebCite Cache ID 6NczY3JOO]
42. Renahy E, Parizot I, Chauvin P. Health information seeking on the Internet: A double divide? Results from a representative survey in the Paris metropolitan area, France, 2005-2006. BMC Public Health 2008;8:69 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-69] [Medline: 18291024]
43. Siliquini R, Ceruti M, Lovato E, Bert F, Bruno S, De Vito E, et al. Surfing the internet for health information: An italian survey on use and population choices. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2011;11:21 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-11-21] [Medline: 21470435]
44. Couper MP, Singer E, Levin CA, Fowler FJ, Fagerlin A, Zikmund-Fisher BJ. Use of the Internet and ratings of information sources for medical decisions: results from the DECISIONS survey. Med Decis Making 2010 Sep;30(5 Suppl):106S-114S. [doi: 10.1177/0272989X10377661] [Medline: 20881159]
45. Nielsen J, Tahir M. Homepage Usability. 50 enttarnte Websites. Munich: Markt+Technik; 2002.
46. Nielsen J. Designing Web Usability. 2nd edition. Munich: Markt+Technik; 2001.