German language physician rating sites;Deutschsprachige Arztbewertungsportale

Gesundheitswesen

Volumn 74, Issue 8-9, 2012, Pages

  Strech, D ^a   Reimann, S ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

e health; medical internet information; patient empowerment; patient experience; patient satisfaction; physician rating sites

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PHYSICIANS; QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84865716627     PISSN: 09413790     EISSN: 14394421     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1297254     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Werner R M, Asch DA. The unintended consequences of publicly reporting quality information. JAMA Mar 9: 2005; 293 10 1239 1244 (Pubitemid 40327909)
2. Freed G L, Dunham K M, Clark S J et al. Perspectives and Preferences among the General Public Regarding Physician Selection and Board Certification. J Pediatr Feb 4: 2010
3. Brennan T A, Horwitz R I, Duffy F D et al. The role of physician specialty board certification status in the quality movement. JAMA Sep 1: 2004; 292 09 1038 1043 (Pubitemid 39129190)
4. Cassel C K, Holmboe E S. Credentialing and public accountability: a central role for board certification. JAMA Feb 22: 2006; 295 08 939 940
5. Strech D. Arztbewertungsportale aus ethischer Perspektive. Eine orientierende Analyse. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes: 2010; 104 8-9 674 681
6. Reimann S, Strech D. The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites. BMC Health Serv Res: 2011; 10 332
7. Stahl R. (Sprecher der Kassenärztlichen Bundesvereinigung) zitiert in: Scharfer Protest gegen Arztbewertung per Internet". 23.6.2009; Available from: www.focus.de/politik/deutschland/gesundheit-scharfer-protest- gegen-arztbewertung-per-internet-aid-407753.html
8. Montgomery F U. (Vize-Präsident der Bundesärztekammer) zitiert in: Arztbewertungsportale: Massive Kritik am AOK-Arzt-Navigator". 25.6.2009; Available from: http://www.aekv-ebersberg.de/aktuelles/105-baek- newsletter-2009-004-vom-25062009
9. Lagu T, Hannon N S, Rothberg M B et al. Patients' Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating Websites. J Gen Intern Med May 13: 2010
10. Carvel J. Patients to rate and review their GPs on NHS website. The Guardian. 2008 30 December 2008
11. ÄZQ Woran erkennt man eine gute Arztpraxis? Checkliste für Patientinnen und Patienten. Schriftenreihe ä editor. Neukirchen Verlag Make a Book: 2008
12. Emmert M, Maryschok M, Eisenreich S et al. Arzt-Bewertungsportale im Internet - Geeignet zur Identifikation guter Arztpraxen? Gesundheitswesen Apr: 2009; 71 04 e18 e27
13. ÄZQ Gute Praxis Bewertungsportale. Qualitätsanforderungen für Arztbewertungsportale. Berlin: 2011
14. Schaefer C, Schwarz S. Wer findet die besten Ärzte Deutschlands? Arztbewertungsportale im Internet. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundh wesen (ZEFQ): 2010; 104 572 577
15. Reimann S, Strech D. The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites. BMC Health Service Research: 2010; 10 332
16. Mayring P. Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken Beltz, UTB: 2002
17. Weaver J B, Mays D, Lindner G et al. Profiling Characteristics of Internet Medical Information Users. The Journal of the Am Informatics Association (JAMIA): 2009; 16 714 722
18. Duffy F D, Gordon G H, Whelan G et al. Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report. Acad Med Jun: 2004; 79 06 495 507 (Pubitemid 38691475)