Long-term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance: A prospective evalution 7 years post-treatment

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 192-199

  Angelieri, Fernanda ^a,b   Franchi, Lorenzo ^b,c   Cevidanes, Lucia H S ^b   Scanavini, Marco A ^a   Mcnamara, James A ^b,d,e  

^a Sao Paulo Methodist University   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF FLORENCE   (Italy)

^d Boston University Medical Campus   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICES; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MANDIBLE RECONSTRUCTION; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; OVERBITE; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR ADVANCEMENT; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; MOLAR; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; OVERBITE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84897438962     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: 14602210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjt026     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Almeida M R, Henriques J F C, Ursi W 2002a Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 121: 458-466
2. Almeida M R, Henriques J F C, Almeida R R, Ursi W 2002b Treatment effects produced by Fränkel appliance in patients with class II, division 1 malocclusion. Angle Orthodontist 72: 418-425
3. Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara J A Jr 2005 The cervical vertebral maturation (CVM) method for the assessment of optimal treatment timing in dentofacial orthopedics. Seminars in Orthodontics 11: 119-129
4. Cevidanes L H S et al. 2005 Comparison of relative mandibular growth vectors with high-resolution 3-dimensional imaging. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 128: 27-34
5. Cevidanes L H S, Franco A A, Scanavini M A, Vigorito J W, Enlow D H, Proffit W R 2003 Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 123: 379-387
6. Cohen J 1992 A power primer. Psychological Bulletin 112: 155-159
7. Creekmore T D, Radney L J 1983 Fränkel appliance therapy: Orthopedic or orthodontic? American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 89-108
8. De Vincenzo J P 1991 Changes in mandibular length before, during, and after successful orthopedic correction of class II malocclusion, using a functional appliance. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 99: 241-257
9. Falck F 1991 Langzeitergebnisse bei der behandlung des distalbisses mit dem funktionsregler. Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie 52: 263-267
10. Falck F, Fränkel R 1989 Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 96: 333-341
11. Fränkel R 1966 The theoretical concept underlying the treatment with functional correctors. Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society 42: 233-254
12. Fränkel R 1969a The practical meaning of the functional matrix in orthodontics. Transactions of the European Orthodontic Society 45: 207-219
13. Fränkel R 1969b The treatment of class II, Division 1 malocclusion with functional correctors. American Journal of Orthodontics 55: 265-275
14. Fränkel R 1974 Decrowding during eruption under the screening influence of vestibular shields. American Journal of Orthodontics 65: 372-406
15. Freeman D C, McNamara J A Jr, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Fränkel C 2009 Long-Term treatment effects of the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 570.e571-570.e576
16. Harvold E P, Vargervik K 1971 Morphogenetic response to activator treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 60: 478-490
17. Houston W J 1983 The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 382-390
18. Jacobson A 1975 The Wits appraisal of jaw disharmony. American Journal of Orthodontics 67: 125-138
19. McNamara J A Jr 1981 Components of class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. The Angle Orthodontist 51: 177-202
20. McNamara J A Jr 1984 A method of cephalometric evaluation. American Journal of Orthodontics 86: 449-469
21. McNamara J A Jr, Brudon W L 2001 Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. Needham Press, Ann Arbor
22. McNamara J A Jr, Huge S A 1981 The Fränkel appliance (FR-2): Model preparation and appliance construction. American Journal of Orthodontics 80: 478-495
23. McNamara J A Jr, Bookstein F L, Shaughnessy T G 1985 Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on class II patients. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 91-110
24. Nielsen I L 1984 Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 401-410
25. Pandis N 2012 Use of controls in clinical trials. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 141: 250-251
26. Perillo L et al. 2011 Evaluation of long-Term effects in patients treated with Fränkel-2 appliance. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry 12: 261-266
27. Perillo L, Johnston L E Jr, Ferro A 1996 Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive class II malocclusions. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 109: 132-139
28. Proffit W R, Fields H W Jr, Sarver D M 2013 Contemporary Orthodontics, 5th edn. Elsevier Mosby, St Louis
29. Remmer K R, Mamandras A H, Hunter W S, Way D C 1985 Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 363-372
30. Ricketts R M 1981 Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics. The first fifty years. The Angle Orthodontist 51: 115-150
31. Robertson N R 1983 An examination of treatment changes in children treated with the function regulator of Fränkel. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 299-310
32. Steiner C 1953 Cephalometrics for you and me. American Journal Orthodontics 39: 729-755
33. Toth L R, McNamara J A Jr 1999 Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance fo Fränkel compared with an untreated class II sample. American Journal Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 116: 597-609.