Clinical outcomes of Fränkel appliance therapy assessed with a counterpart analysis

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 123, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 379-387

  Cevidanes, Lucia H S ^a,b,e   Franco, Alexandre A ^c   Scanavini, Marco A ^b   Vigorito, Julio W ^b   Enlow, Donald H ^d   Proffit, William R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDADE METODISTA DE SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE GROWTH; CEPHALOMETRY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MIDDLE CRANIAL FOSSA; ORTHODONTICS; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; SCHOOL CHILD; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; NOSE; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PATHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROTATION; STATISTICS; TOOTH ARCH; TOOTH OCCLUSION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CRANIAL FOSSA, MIDDLE; DENTAL ARCH; DENTAL OCCLUSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; NOSE; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; ROTATION; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERTICAL DIMENSION;

EID: 0037851982     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2003.74     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Kim JC, Mascarenhas AK, Joo BH, Vig KWL, Beck FM, Vig PS. Cephalometric variables as predictors of Class II treatment outcome. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:636-40.
2. Johnston LE Jr. Let them eat cake: the struggle between form and substance in orthodontic clinical investigation. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:88-93.
3. Ghafari J, King GJ, Tulloch JF. Early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion - comparison of alternative treatment modalities. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:107-17.
4. Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. The morphologic and morphogenetic basis for craniofacial form and pattern. Angle Orthod 1971;41:161-88.
5. Moyers RE, Bookstein FL. The inappropriateness of conventional cephalometrics. Am J Orthod 1979;75:599-617.
6. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J, Shaye R. Is it possible to modulate the growth of the human mandible with a functional appliance? Int J Orthod 1991;29:3-8.
7. Proffit WR, Fields HW. Contemporary orthodontics. St Louis: Mosby; 2000.
8. Ghafari J, Baumrind S, Efstratiadis SS. Misinterpreting growth and treatment outcome from serial cephalographs. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:102-6.
9. Tulloch JFC, Proffit WR, Phillips C. Influences on the outcome of early treatment for Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:533-42.
10. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod 1985;88:91-110.
11. Bhat M, Enlow DH. Facial variations related to headform type. Angle Orthod 1985;55:269-80.
12. Petrovic A, Stutzmann J, Lavergne J. Mechanism of craniofacial growth and modus operandi of functional appliances: a cell-level and cybernetic approach to orthodontic decision making. In: Carlson DS, editor. Craniofacial growth theory and orthodontic treatment. Monograph 23. Craniofacial growth series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1990. p. 13-74.
13. Björk A, Skieller V. Contrasting mandibular growth and facial development in long face syndrome, juvenile rheumatoid polyarthritis, and mandibulofacial dysostosis. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol (Suppl) 1985;1:127-38.
14. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod 1983;5:1-46.
15. Wilhelm BM, Beck FM, Lidral AC, Vig KWL. A comparison of cranial base growth in Class I and Class II skeletal patterns. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:401-5.
16. Coben SE. The spheno-occipital synchondrosis: the missing link between the profession's concept of craniofacial growth and orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:709-12.
17. Lewis AB, Roche AF, Wagner B. Pubertal spurts in cranial base and mandible: comparisons between individuals. Angle Orthod 1985;55:17-30.
18. Dibbets JM. Morphological associations between the Angle classes. Eur J Orthod 1996;18:111-8.
19. Enlow DH, Kuroda T, Lewis AB. Intrinsic craniofacial compensations. Angle Orthod 1971;41:271-85.
20. Phillips C, Tulloch C. The randomized clinical trial as a powerful means for understanding treatment efficacy. Semin Orthod 1995;1:128-38.
21. Gross AM, Bishop FW, Reese D, Lollis T, Janke C, Hedden C, et al. Increasing patient compliance with appointment keeping. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1988;94:259-60.
22. Fränkel R. Biomechanical aspects of the form/function relationship in craniofacial morphogenesis: a clinician's approach. In: McNamara JA Jr, Ribbets KA, Howe RP, editors. Clinical alteration of the growing face. Monograph 14. Craniofacial growth series. Ann Arbor: Center for Human Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1983. p. 107-30.
23. Enlow DH, Di Gangi D, Mcnamara JA Jr, Mina M. An evaluation of the morphogenic and anatomic effects of the functional regulator utilizing the counterpart analysis. Eur J Orthod 1988;10:192-202.
24. Dahlberg G. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. New York: Interscience Publications; 1940.
25. Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:62-72.
26. Ghafari J, Shofer FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus functional regulator in the early treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:51-61.
27. Keeling SD, Wheeler TT, King GJ, Garvan CW, Cohen DA, Cabassa S, et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:40-50.
28. Livieratos FA, Johnston LE Jr. A comparison of one-stage and two-stage nonextraction alternatives in matched Class II samples. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1995;108:118-31.
29. Baccetti T, Franchi L, Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment timing for Twin-block therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:159-70.
30. Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999;116:597-609.
31. Lund DL, Sandler PJ. The effects of Twin Blocks: a prospective controlled study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;113:104-10.
32. Lai M, McNamara JA Jr. An evaluation of two-phase treatment with the Herbst appliance and preadjusted edgewise therapy. Semin Orthod 1998;4:46-58.
33. Pancherz H. The Herbst appliance: its biological effects and clinical use. Am J Orthod 1985;87:1-20.
34. Mills CM, McCulloch KJ. Posttreatment changes after successful correction of Class II malocclusions with the Twin Block appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;118:24-33.
35. Singh GD, Clark WJ. Localization of mandibular changes in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with Twin-block appliances: finite element scaling analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:419-25.
36. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1993;104:153-61.
37. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:134-44.
38. Rushforth CD, Gordon PH, Aird JC. Skeletal and dental changes following the use of the Fränkel functional regulator. Br J Orthod 1999;26:127-34.
39. Franco AA, Yamashita HK, Lederman HM, Cevidanes LHS, Proffit WR, Vigorito JW. Fränkel appliance therapy and the temporomandibular disc: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:447-57.
40. Wheeler TT, McGorray SP, Dolce C, Taylor MG, King GJ. Effectiveness of early treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;121:9-17.
41. Fields HW, Proffit WR, Nixon WL, Phillips C, Stanek E. Facial pattern differences in long-faced children and adults. Am J Orthod 1984;85:217-23.
42. Moro A, Scanavini MA, Vigorito JW. Johnston analysis evaluation of Class II correction in patients belonging to Petrovic growth categories 3 and 5. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:86-97.
43. Leslie LR, Southard TE, Southard KA, Casko JS, Jakobsen JR, Tolley EA, et al. Prediction of mandibular growth rotation: assessment of the Skieller, Björk, and Linde-Hansen method. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:659-67.
44. Baumrind S. The decision to extract: preliminary findings from a prospective clinical trial. In: McNamara JA Jr, editor. Orthodontic treatment: outcome and effectiveness. Monograph 30. Craniofacial growth series. Ann Arbor: Center for Growth and Development; University of Michigan; 1995. p. 43-80.
45. Vig KW, Weyant R, Vayda D, O'Brien K, Bennett E. Orthodontic process and outcome: efficacy studies - strategies for developing process and outcome measures: a new era in orthodontics. Clin Orthod Res 1998;1:147-55.
46. Tulloch JFC, Medland W, Tuncay OC. Methods used to evaluate growth modification in Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990;98:340-7.
47. Tahir E, Sadowsky C, Schneider BJ. An assessment of treatment outcome in American Board of Orthodontics cases. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:335-42.
48. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years old. Angle Orthod 1981;51:177-202.