Treatment Effects Produced by Fränkel Appliance in Patients with Class II, Division 1 Malocclusion

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 72, Issue 5, 2002, Pages 418-425

  De Almeida, Marcio Rodrigues ^a,b   Henriques, José Fernando Castanha ^b   De Almeida, Renato Rodrigues ^b   Ursi, Weber ^c  

^a METHODIST UNIVERSITY OF PIRACICABA   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^c SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Class II, division 1 malocclusion; Functional orthopedics; Functional Regulator appliance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INCISOR; JAW; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PALATE; PATHOLOGY; ROTATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ALVEOLAR PROCESS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INCISOR; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBLE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MAXILLA; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCES, FUNCTIONAL; PALATE; ROTATION; SEX FACTORS; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0346044619     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Remmer KR, Mamandras AH, Hunter WS, Way DC. Cephalometric changes associated with treatment using the Activator, the Fränkel appliance, and the fixed appliance. Am J Orthod. 1985; 88:363-372.
2. McNamara JA Jr. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8-10 years of age. Angle Orthod. 1981;51:177-202.
3. Fränkel R. The theoretical concept underlying the treatment with functional correctors. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1966;42:233-254.
4. Fränkel R. The treatment of Class II, Division 1 malocclusion with functional correctors. Am J Orthod. 1969;55:265-275.
5. Fränkel R. A functional approach to orofacial orthopedics. Br J Orthod. 1980;7:41-51.
6. Fränkel R. Biomechanical aspects of the form/function relationship in craniofacial morphogenesis: a clinician's approach. In McNamara JA Jr, Ribbens KA, Howe RP, eds. Clinical Alteration of the Growing Face, Monograph 14, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1983.
7. Harvold EP, Vargervik K. Morphogenetic response to Activator treatment. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:478-490.
8. Moss JP. Cephalometric changes during functional appliance therapy. Trans Eur Orthod. Soc 1962;38:327-341.
9. Evald H, Harvold EP. The effect of activators on maxillary-mandibular growth and relationships. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:857.
10. Meach CL. A cephalometric comparison of bony profile changes in Class II, Division 1 patients treated with extraoral force and functional jaw orthopedics. Am J Orthod. 1966;52:353-370.
11. Freunthaller P. Cephalometric observations in Class II, Division 1 malocclusions treated with the activator. Angle Orthod. 1967; 37:18-25.
12. Hotz R. Application and appliance manipulation of functional forces. Am J Orthod. 1970;58:459-478.
13. Ghafari J, Shofer, FS, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz DL, Laster LL. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:51-61.
14. Righellis EG. Treatment effects of Frankel, Activator and extra-oral traction appliances. Angle Orthod. 1983;53:107-121.
15. Robertson NRE. An examination of treatment changes in children treated with the function regulator of Fränkel. Am J Orthod. 1983; 83:299-310.
16. Bookstein FL. Measuring treatment effects on craniofacial growth. In McNamara JA Jr, Ribbens KA, Howe RP, eds. Clinical Alteration of the Growing Face, Monograph 14, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan; 1983.
17. Toth LR, McNamara JA Jr. Treatment effects produced by the Twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;116:597-609.
18. Hamilton SD, Sinclair PM, Hamilton RH. A cephalometric, tomographic, and dental cast evaluation of Fränkel therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1987;92:427-434.
19. Kerr WJS, Tenhave TR, McNamara JA Jr. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes produced by function regulators (FR-2 and FR-3). Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:235-242.
20. Perillo L, Johnston LE Jr, Ferro A. Permanence of skeletal changes after function regulator (FR-2) treatment of patients with retrusive Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:132-139.
21. Bass NM. Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjuction with edgewise therapy. Part I. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:361-383.
22. Stöckli PW, Willert HG. Tissue reactions in the temporomandibular joint resulting from anterior displacement of the mandible in the monkey. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:142-155.
23. Petrovic A, Stutzman J, Oudet C. Control processes in the post-natal growth of the condylar cartilage of the mandible. In McNamara JA Jr, ed. Determinants of Mandibular Form and Growth, Monograph No 4, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1975:101-153.
24. McNamara JA Jr. Neuromuscular and skeletal adaptations to altered function in the orofacial region. Am J Orthod. 1973;64:578-606.
25. Creekmore TD, Radney LJ. Fränkel appliance therapy: orthopedic or orthodontic? Am J Orthod. 1983;83:89-108.
26. Schulhof RJ, Engel, GA. Results of Class II functional appliance treatment. J Clin Orthod. 1982;16:587-99.
27. McNamara JA Jr, Bookstein FL, Shaughnessy TG. Skeletal and dental changes following functional regulator therapy on Class II patients. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:91-110.
28. McNamara JA Jr, Howe RP, Dischinger TG. A comparison of the Herbst and the Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;98:134-144.
29. McNamara JA Jr, Huge SA. The Fränkel appliance (FR-2): model preparation and appliance construction. Am J Orthod. 1981;80: 478-497.
30. Falck F, Fränkel R. Clinical relevance of step-by-step mandibular advancement in the treatment of mandibular retrusion using the Fränkel appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96: 333-341.
31. Houston WJB. The analysis of errors in orthodontic measurements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1983;83:382-390.
32. Almeida MR, Henriques JFC, Almeida RR, Janson GRP. Cephalometric evaluation of Fränkel Appliance effects in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion patients. Rev Dental Press Ortod Ortop Fac. 1998;3:53-70.
33. Gianelly AA, Arena, AS, Bernstein L. A comparison of Class II treatment changes noted with the light wire, edgewise, and Fränkel appliances. Am J Orthod. 1984;86:269-76.
34. Nielsen IL. Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:401-410.
35. Owen AH. Maxillary incisolabial responses in Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and edgewise. Angle Orthod. 1986;56: 67-87.
36. Derringer K. A cephalometric study to compare the effects of cervical traction and Andresen therapy in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion. Part 1-Skeletal changes. Brit J Orthod. 1990;17:33-46.
37. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH. Class II, division 1 treatment with Fränkel and edgewise appliances. A comparative study of mandibular growth and facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1985;55:281-298.
38. Haynes S. Profile changes in modified functional regulator therapy. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:309-314.
39. Wieslander L, Lagerström L. The effect of Activator treatment on Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1979;75:20-26.
40. Mills JRE. The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. Brit J Orthod. 1991;18:267-275.
41. Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Proffit WR. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;113:62-72.
42. Tulloch JFC, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997; 111:391-399.
43. Jakobsson SO, Paulin G. The influence of Activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study. Eur J Orthod. 1990;12:174-184.
44. Lange DW, Kalra V, Broadbent BH Jr, Powers M, Nelson S. Changes in soft tissue profile following treatment with the Bionator. Angle Orthod. 1995;65:423-430.
45. Pancherz H. A cephalometric analysis of skeletal and dental changes contributing to Class II correction in Activator treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1984;85:125-134.
46. Thüer U, Ingervall B, Bürgin W. Does the mandible alter its functional position during Activator treatment? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;96:477-484.
47. Cura, N, Saraç M, Öztürk Y, Sürmeli N. Orthodontic and orthopedic effects of Activador, Activator-HG combination, and Bass appliances: a comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:36-45.
48. Webster T, Harkness M, Herbison P. Associations between changes in selected facial dimensions and the outcome of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;110:46-53.
49. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P. Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104:153-161.
50. Bolmgren GA, Moshiri F. Bionator treatment in Class II, division 1. Angle Orthod. 1986;56:255-262.
51. Courtney M, Harkness M, Herbison P. Maxillary and cranial base changes during treatment with functional appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;109:616-624.
52. Janson I. Skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in patients treated with a Bionator during prepubertal and pubertal growth. In: McNamara JA Jr, Ribbens KA, Howe RP, eds. Clinical Alteration of the Growing Face. Monograph 14, Craniofacial Growth Series. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1983.
53. Vargervik K, Harvold EP. Response to Activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1985;88:242-251.
54. Janson IA. A cephalometric study of the efficiency of the Bionator. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1977;28:283-298.
55. Janson M, Hasund A. Functional problems in orthodontic patients out of retention. Eur J Orthod. 1983;3:173-179.
56. Tsamtsouris A, Vedrenne D. The use of the Bionator appliance in the treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion in the late mixed dentition. J Pedod. 1983;8:78-104.
57. Bishara SE, Ziaja RR. Functional appliances: A review. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;95:250-258.
58. Bass NM. Orthopedic coordination of dentofacial development in skeletal Class II malocclusion in conjunction with edgewise therapy. Part I. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:361-383.