Responsiveness of a Danish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire

Danish Medical Journal

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2014, Pages

  Lundquist, Camilla B ^a   Døssing, Kaj ^a   Christiansen, David H ^b  

^a VIBORG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

^b HERNING HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND (SCORE); FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMEROSCAPULAR PERIARTHRITIS; HUMERUS FRACTURE; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SCORING SYSTEM; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; SHOULDER PAIN; DENMARK; DISABILITY; JOINT DISEASES; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; SHOULDER;

DENMARK; DISABILITY EVALUATION; HUMANS; JOINT DISEASES; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROC CURVE; SHOULDER JOINT;

EID: 84897399153     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22451919     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:34-42.
2. Herup A, Merser S, Boeckstyns M. Validation of questionnaire for conditions of the upper extremity. Ugeskr Læger 2010;172:3333-6.
3. Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The shoulder pain and disability index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther 1997;77:1079-89.
4. Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A et al. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:S174-S188.
5. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Pol 1996;37:53-72.
6. Olerud P, Tidermark J, Ponzer S et al. Responsiveness of the EQ-5D in patients with proximal humeral fractures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2011;20:1200-6.
7. Bailey BJ, Johnson JT, Newlands SD. Head and neck surgery: otolaryngology. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006:23.
8. Michener LA, Snyder Valier AR, McClure PW. Defining substantial clinical benefit for patient-rated outcome tools for shoulder impingement syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2013;94:725-30.
9. Lehman LA, Sindhu BS, Shechtman O et al. A comparison of the ability of two upper extremity assessments to measure change in function. J Hand Ther 2010;23:31-40.
10. Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S et al. Responsiveness of six outcome assessment instruments in total shoulder arthroplasty. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:391-98.
11. Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol 2004;57:1008-18.
12. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Katz JN et al. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:1204-17.
13. Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther 2009;17:163-70.