Defining substantial clinical benefit for patient-rated outcome tools for shoulder impingement syndrome

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 94, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 725-730

  Michener, Lori A ^a   Snyder Valier, Alison R ^b   McClure, Philip W ^c  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ARCADIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Outcome; Rehabilitation; Rotator cuff

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLOBAL RATING OF CHANGE; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PENNSYLVANIA SHOULDER SCORE; PERCEPTION; RATING SCALE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; SUBSTANTIAL CLINICAL BENEFIT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DIAGNOSTIC SELF EVALUATION; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROC CURVE; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84875461838     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.11.011     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. P.L. Hudak, P.C. Amadio, and C. Bombardier Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) Am J Ind Med 29 1996 602 608
2. B.G. Leggin, L.A. Michener, M.A. Shaffer, S.K. Brenneman, J.P. Iannotti, and G.R. Williams Jr. The Penn shoulder score: reliability and validity J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36 2006 138 151
3. D.E. Beaton, C. Bombardier, and J.N. Katz Looking for important change/differences in studies of responsiveness. OMERACT MCID Working Group. Outcome Measures in Rheumatology. Minimal Clinically Important Difference J Rheumatol 28 2001 400 405
4. S.D. Glassman, A.G. Copay, S.H. Berven, D.W. Polly, B.R. Subach, and L.Y. Carreon Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis J Bone Joint Surg Am 90 2008 1839 1847
5. J.S. Schmitt, and R.P. Di Fabio Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria J Clin Epidemiol 57 2004 1008 1018
6. R. Jaeschke, J. Singer, and G.H. Guyatt Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference Control Clin Trials 10 1989 407 415
7. A.A. Wright, C.E. Cook, G.D. Baxter, J.D. Dockerty, and J.H. Abbott A comparison of 3 methodological approaches to defining major clinically important improvement of 4 performance measures in patients with hip osteoarthritis J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 41 2011 319 327
8. A.R. Tate, P.W. McClure, I.A. Young, R. Salvatori, and L.A. Michener Comprehensive impairment-based exercise and manual therapy intervention for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a case series J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 40 2010 474 493
9. L.A. Michener, M.K. Walsworth, and E.N. Burnet Effectiveness of rehabilitation for patients with subacromial impingement syndrome: a systematic review J Hand Ther 17 2004 152 164
10. T.O. Kromer, U.G. Tautenhahn, R.A. de Bie, J.B. Staal, and C.H. Bastiaenen Effects of physiotherapy in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a systematic review of the literature J Rehabil Med 41 2009 870 880
11. D.E. Beaton, J.N. Katz, A.H. Fossel, J.G. Wright, V. Tarasuk, and C. Bombardier Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity J Hand Ther 14 2001 128 146
12. A. Kirkley, S. Griffin, H. McLintock, and L. Ng The development and evaluation of a disease-specific quality of life measurement tool for shoulder instability. The Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) Am J Sports Med 26 1998 764 772
13. C. Gummesson, I. Atroshi, and C. Ekdahl The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery BMC Musculoskelet Disord 4 2003 11
14. J.S. Roy, J.C. MacDermid, and L.J. Woodhouse Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires Arthritis Rheum 61 2009 623 632
15. C.P. Gabel, L.A. Michener, B. Burkett, and A. Neller The Upper Limb Functional Index: development and determination of reliability, validity, and responsiveness J Hand Ther 19 2006 328 348
16. J.A. Hanley, and B.J. McNeil The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve Radiology 143 1982 29 36
17. F. Salaffi, A. Stancati, C.A. Silvestri, A. Ciapetti, and W. Grassi Minimal clinically important changes in chronic musculoskeletal pain intensity measured on a numerical rating scale Eur J Pain 8 2004 283 291
18. J.D. Childs, S.R. Piva, and J.M. Fritz Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain Spine 30 2005 1331 1334
19. P.W. Stratford, F.M. Binkley, and D.L. Riddle Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores Phys Ther 76 1996 1109 1123
20. R.H. Dworkin, D.C. Turk, and M.P. McDermott Interpreting the clinical importance of group differences in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations Pain 146 2009 238 244
21. K.F. Cook, G.M. Gartsman, T.S. Roddey, and S.L. Olson The measurement level and trait-specific reliability of 4 scales of shoulder functioning: an empiric investigation Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82 2001 1558 1565
22. P.M. ten Klooster, K.W. Drossaers-Bakker, E. Taal, and M.A. van de Laar Patient-perceived satisfactory improvement (PPSI): interpreting meaningful change in pain from the patient's perspective Pain 121 2006 151 157
23. D. Beaton, and R.R. Richards Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires J Shoulder Elbow Surg 7 1998 565 572
24. D.E. Beaton, and R.R. Richards Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires J Bone Joint Surg Am 78 1996 882 890
25. P.E. Mintken, P. Glynn, and J.A. Cleland Psychometric properties of the shortened Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18 2009 920 926
26. M.E. Robinson, J.L. Brown, and S.Z. George Multidimensional success criteria and expectations for treatment of chronic pain: the patient perspective Pain Med 6 2005 336 345
27. G.R. Norman, P. Stratford, and G. Regehr Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach J Clin Epidemiol 50 1997 869 879
28. G.H. Guyatt, G.R. Norman, E.F. Juniper, and L.E. Griffith A critical look at transition ratings J Clin Epidemiol 55 2002 900 908
29. D.E. Beaton, V. Tarasuk, J.N. Katz, J.G. Wright, and C. Bombardier "Are you better?" A qualitative study of the meaning of recovery Arthritis Rheum 45 2001 270 279
30. P.M. ten Klooster, K.W. Drossaers-Bakker, E. Taal, and M.A. van de Laar Can we assess baseline pain and global health retrospectively? Clin Exp Rheumatol 25 2007 176 181