Validering af spørgeskema ved lidelser i overekstremiteten

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 172, Issue 48, 2010, Pages 3333-3336

  Herup, Alex ^a   Merser, Søren ^a   Boeckstyns, Michel ^a  

^a GENTOFTE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DISABILITY; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHOULDER; VALIDATION STUDY;

DISABILITY EVALUATION; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASES; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOULDER;

EID: 78650666229     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Solay S, Beaton DE, McConnell S et al. DASH outcome measure user's manual. 2. ed. Toronto: Institute for Work & Health, 2002.
2. Hobby JL, Watts C, Elliot D. Validity and responsiveness of the patient evaluation measure as an outcome measure for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Br) 2005;30:350-4.
3. Chiari-Grisar C, Koller U, Stamm TA et al. Performance of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome questionnaire and the Moberg picking up test in patients with finger joint arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:203-6.
4. Keller M, Steiger R. [Open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius extension fractures in women over 60 years of age with the dorsal radius plate (piplate)]. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2006;38:82-9.
5. Su BW, Solomons M, Barrow A et al. Device for zone-II flexor tendon repair. A multicenter, randomized, blinded, clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:923-35.
6. Ruch DS, Papadonikolakis A. Arthroscopically assisted repair of peripheral triangular fibrocartilage complex tears: factors affecting outcome. Arthroscopy 2005;21:1126-30.
7. De Smet L. Responsiveness of the DASH score in surgically treated basal joint arthritis of the thumb: preliminary results. Clin Rheumatol 2004;23:223-4.
8. Davidson J. A comparison of upper limb amputees and patients with upper limb injuries using the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH). Disabil Rehabil 2004;26:917-23.
9. Bengtsson M, Lunsjo K, Hermodsson Y et al. High patient satisfaction after arthroscopic subacromial decompression for shoulder impingement: a prospective study of 50 patients. Acta Orthop 2006;77:138-42.
10. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH et al. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. J Hand Ther 2001;14:128-46.
11. Turchin DC, Beaton DE, Richards RR. Validity of observer-based aggregate scoring systems as descriptors of elbow pain, function, and disability. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998;80:154-62.
12. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:420-8.
13. Lee EW, Lau JS, Chung MM et al. Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study. J Hand Ther 2004;17:417-23.
14. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B et al. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: reliability and validity of the Swedish version evaluated in 176 patients. Acta Orthop Scand 2000;71:613-8.
15. Imaeda T, Toh S, Nakao Y et al. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. J Orthop Sci 2005;10:353-9.
16. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E et al. Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. J Hand Surg (Br) 2003;28:179-86.
17. Themistocleous GS, Goudelis G, Kyrou I et al. Translation into Greek, crosscul tural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). J Hand Ther 2006;19:350-7.
18. Cronbach L. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951;16:297-334.
19. Rankin G, Stokes M. Reliability of assessment tools in rehabilitation: an illustration of appropriate statistical analyses. Clin Rehabil 1998;12:187-99.
20. Orfale AG, Araujo PM, Ferraz MB et al. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Questionnaire. Braz J Med Biol Res 2005;38:293-302.