Enhanced adhesive strength between shape memory polymer nanocomposite and titanium alloy

Composites Science and Technology

Volumn 96, Issue , 2014, Pages 23-30

  Kang, Jin Ho ^a   Siochi, Emilie J ^b   Penner, Ronald K ^c   Turner, Travis L ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF AEROSPACE   (United States)

^b NASA LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

^c SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION   (United States)

Author keywords

A. Adhesive joint; A. Alloys; A. Carbon nanotubes; B. Interfacial strength; Shape memory polymer

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ADHESIVE JOINTS; BOND STRENGTH (MATERIALS); BUTENES; CARBON NANOTUBES; COMPOSITE MATERIALS; COUPLING AGENTS; NANOCOMPOSITES; POLYETHYLENE OXIDES; POLYMERS; TITANIUM ALLOYS; X RAY SPECTROSCOPY;

ADHESION MECHANISMS; ENERGY DISPERSIVE X RAY SPECTROSCOPY; INTERFACIAL ADHESIONS; INTERFACIAL STRENGTH; SHAPE MEMORY POLYMERS; SHAPE-MEMORY MATERIALS; SILANE COUPLING AGENT; STRUCTURAL CONCEPT;

SHAPE MEMORY EFFECT;

EID: 84897370813     PISSN: 02663538     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2014.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Mather P.T., Xiaofan L., Rousseau I.A. Shape memory research. Annu Rev Mater Res 2009, 39:445-471.
2. Buehler W.J., Gilfrich J.V., Wiley R.C. Effect of low-temperature phase changes on the mechanical properties of alloys near composition TiNi. J Appl Phys 1963, 34:1475-1477.
3. Hayashi S, Fujimura H. Shape memory polymer foam. US patent 5,049,591; 1991.
4. Shape memory polymers 1998, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. K. Otsuka, C.M. Wayman (Eds.).
5. Tobushi H., Hara H., Yamada E., Hayashi S. Thermomechanical properties in a thin film of shape memory polymer of polyurethane series. Smart Mater Struct 1996, 5:483-491.
6. Gall K., Dunn M.L., Liu Y., Finch D., Lake M., Munshi N.A. Shape memory polymer nanocomposites. Acta Mater 2002, 50:5115-5126.
7. Koerner H., Price G., Pearce N.A., Alexander M., Vaia R.A. Remotely actuated polymer nanocomposites-stress-recovery of carbon-nanotube-filled thermoplastic elastomers. Nat Mater 2004, 3:115-120.
8. Perkins D.A., Reed J.L., Havens E. Adaptive wing structure. Proc SPIE 2004, 5388:225-233.
9. Yu Y., Li X., Zhang W., Leng J. Investigation on adaptive wing structure based on shape memory polymer composite hinge. Proc SPIE 2007, 64231D-65235D.
10. Kang JH, Siochi EJ, Penner RK, Turner TL. AC electric field activated shape memory polymer composite. Southeastern. Regional Meeting of ACS (SERMACS), Richmond, VA, 28 October 2011.
11. Sever K., Sarikanat M., Seki Y., Tavman I.H. Concentration effect of γ-glycidoxypropyltrimetohxysilane on the mechanical properties of glass fiber-epoxy composites. Polym Compos 2009, 30:1251-1257.
12. Wu S. Polymer interface and adhesion 1982, Marcel Dekker, New York.
13. Pocius A.V. Adhesion and adhesives technology 1997, Hanser Publishers, New York.
14. Kang J.H., Cho K., Kim J.K., Park C.E., Uhm S.J., Khatua B.B. Investigation of surface molecular orientation of poly(dimethylsiloxane-co-diphenylsiloxane)-modified poly(amic acid) films using dynamic contact angle measurements, NEXAFS and XPS. J Adhesion Sci Technol 2004, 18:1815-1831.
15. Miyama M., Yang Y., Yasuda T., Okuna T., Yasuda H.K. Static and dynamic contact angles of water on polymeric surfaces. Langmuir 1997, 13:5494-5503.
16. Hinkley J. Small compact tension specimens for polymer toughness screening. J Appl Polym Sci 1986, 32:5653-5655.
17. Lin J.R., Chen L.W. Shape-memorized crosslinked ester-type polyurethane and its mechanical viscoelastic model. J Appl Polym Sci 1999, 73:1305-1319.
18. Onjun O., Pearson R.A. Effect of silane adhesion promoters on subcritical debonding of epoxy/glass interfaces after hygrothermal aging. J Adhesion 2010, 86:1178-1202.
19. Bertho J., Stolojan V., Abel M.L., Watts J.F. The effect of silane incorporation on a metal adhesive interface. A study by electron energy loss spectroscopy. Micron 2010, 41:130-134.
20. Kinloch A.J. Adhesion and adhesives: science and technology 1987, Chapman and Hall, New York.
21. Roche A.A., Bouchet J., Bentadjine S. Formation of epoxy-diamine/metal interphases. Inter J Adhesion & Adhesives 2002, 22:431-441.
22. Lee J.H., Rhee K.Y., Lee J.H. Effects of moisture absorption and surface modification using 3-aminopropyltriethyoxysilane on the tensile and fracture characteristics of MWCNT/epoxy nanocomposites. Appl Surf Sci 2010, 256:7658-7667.
23. Jang J., Kim E.K. Corrosion protection of epoxy-coated steel using different silane coupling agents. J Appl Polym Sci 1999, 71:585-593.
24. Rider A.N. Factors influencing the durability of epoxy adhesion to silane pretreated aluminum. Inter J Adhesion & Adhesives 2006, 26:67-78.
25. Marur P.R., Batra R.C., Garcia G., Loos A. Static and dynamic fracture toughness of epoxy/alumina composite with submicron inclusions. J Mater Sci 2004, 39:1437-1440.
26. Klemann B.M. The Fracture toughness of thin polymeric films. Polym Eng Sci 1996, 36:126-134.
27. Valette L, Ji D, Li J. Toughness improvement in epoxy/anhydride formulations for electrical insulation. IEEE Electric Insul. Conf., Montreal, QC, Canada, May 31-June 3, 2009.
28. Hsieh T.H., Kinloch A.J., Taylor A.C., Kinloch I.A. The effect of carbon nanotubes on the fracture toughness and fatigue performance of a thermosetting epoxy polymer. J Mater Sci 2011, 46:7525-7535.
29. Uete H., Caddell M. Determination of the fracture toughness of polycarbonate using an energy approach. Int J Mech Sci 1983, 25:87-92.