Theoretical study on the nature of S⋯H and O⋯H hydrogen bonds

Journal of Sulfur Chemistry

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 290-303

  Kaur, Damanjit ^a   Aulakh, Darpandeep ^a   Khanna, Shweta ^a   Singh, Harpreet ^b  

^a GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Hans Raj Mahila Maha Vidyala   (India)

Author keywords

charge transfer; electrostatic interactions; hydrogen bonding; intermolecular interactions

Indexed keywords

CHLORINE COMPOUNDS; ELECTROSTATICS; HYDROGEN BONDS; MOLECULAR ORBITALS; OXYGEN; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; STABILIZATION; SULFUR COMPOUNDS;

COMPLETE BASIS SETS; DIMETHYLSULPHIDE; ELECTROSTATIC COMPONENTS; HYDROGEN BOND ACCEPTORS; INTERMOLECULAR INTERACTIONS; MOLECULAR ORBITAL METHOD; NATURAL BOND ORBITAL ANALYSIS; STABILIZATION ENERGY; SYMMETRY-ADAPTED PERTURBATION THEORY; THEORETICAL STUDY;

CHARGE TRANSFER;

EID: 84897097768     PISSN: 17415993     EISSN: 17416000     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17415993.2013.874425     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Desiraju GR, Steiner T. The weak hydrogen bond in structural chemistry and biology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
2. Jeffrey GA. An introduction to hydrogen bonding. New York: Oxford University; 1997.
3. Scheiner S. Hydrogen bonding: a theoretical perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997.
4. Li JC, Ross DK. Evidence for two kinds of hydrogen bond in ice. Nature. 1993; 365: 327-329. doi: 10.1038/365327a0
5. Lehn JM. Supramolecular chemistry: concepts and perspectives. Weinheim: VCH; 1995.
6. Desiraju GR. Crystal engineering. The design of organic solids. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 1989.
7. Desiraju GR. The C-H ···O hydrogen bond: structural implications and supramolecular design. Acc Chem Res. 1996; 29: 441-449. doi: 10.1021/ar950135n
8. Kaur D, Khanna S. Intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions of furan, isoxazole and oxazole with water. Comput Theor Chem. 2011; 963: 71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.comptc.2010.09.011
9. Cabaleiro-Lago EM, Rodríguez-Otero J, Peña-Gallego A. Computational study of the interaction of indole-like molecules with water and hydrogen sulfide. J Chem Phys. 2011; 135: 134310-134318. doi: 10.1063/1.3643840
10. Mintz BJ, Parks JM. Benchmark interaction energies for biologically relevant noncovalent complexes containing divalent sulfur. J Phys Chem A. 2012; 116: 1086-1092. doi: 10.1021/jp209536e
11. 2S-benzene dimer. J Phys Chem A. 2005; 109: 191-196. doi: 10.1021/jp046778e
12. 2. J Mol Struct. 2002; 586: 149-157. doi: 10.1016/S0166-1280(02) 00082-9
13. Howard DL, Kjaergaard HG. Hydrogen bonding to divalent sulfur. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2008; 10: 4113-4118. doi: 10.1039/b806165c
14. Pal D, Chakrabarti P. Different types of interactions involving cysteine sulfhydryl group in proteins. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 1998; 15: 1059-1072. doi: 10.1080/07391102.1998.10509001
15. Zauhar RJ, Colbert CL, Morgan RS, Welsh WJ. Evidence for a strong sulfur aromatic interaction derived from crystallographic data. Biopolymers. 2000; 53: 233-248. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0282(200003)53:3<233:AID-BIP3>3.0.CO;2-4
16. Krepps MK, Parkin S, Atwood DA. Hydrogen bonding with sulfur. Cryst Growth Des. 2001; 1: 291-297. doi: 10.1021/cg015505v
17. Iwaoka M, Takemoto S, Okada M, Tomoda S. Weak nonbonded S ···X (X O, N, and S) interactions in proteins. Statistical and theoretical studies. Bull Chem Soc Jpn. 2002; 75: 1611-1625.
18. 2 (X O, S) clusters. J Phys Chem A. 2008; 112: 6344-6350. doi: 10.1021/jp8021979
19. 2S complexes. J Phys Chem A. 2009;113:5633-5643.
20. Vila A, Mosquera RA. On the different origin of the stabilization of oxygen versus sulfur H-bond complexes with water. Chem Phys. 2003; 291: 73-80. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0104(03)00185-X
21. Platts JA, Howard ST, Bracke BRF. Directionality of hydrogen bonds to sulfur and oxygen. J Am Chem Soc. 1996; 118: 2726-2733. doi: 10.1021/ja952871s
22. Biswal HS, Wategaonkar S. Nature of the N hydrogen bond. J Phys Chem A. 2009;113:12763-12773.
23. Biswal HS, Shirhatti PR, Wategaonkar S. O H ···O versus O hydrogen bonding. 2. Alcohols and thiols as hydrogen bond acceptors. J Phys Chem A. 2010;114:6944-6955.
24. Wierzejewska M, Salłdyka M. Are hydrogen bonds to sulfur and oxygen different? Theoretical study of dimethylsulfide and dimethylether complexes with nitric acid. Chem Phys Lett. 2004; 391: 143-147. doi: 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.04.101
25. Wennmohs F, Staemmler V, Schindler M. Theoretical investigation of weak hydrogen bonds to sulfur. J Chem Phys. 2003; 119: 3208-3218. doi: 10.1063/1.1588291
26. Parr RG, Yang W. Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.
27. Bartolotti LJ, Fluchick K. An introduction to density functional theory. In: Lipkowitz KB, Boyd DB., editors. Reviews in Computational Chemistry. Vol. 7. New York: VCH; 1995. p. 187-216.
28. Hehre WJ, Radom L, Schleyer PVR, Pople JA. Ab initio molecular orbital theory. New York: Wiley; 1986.
29. Forseman JB, Frisch E. Exploring chemistry with electronic methods. 2nd ed. Pittsburgh: Gaussian Inc.; 1996.
30. Dunning TH Jr. A road map for the calculation of molecular binding energies. J Phys Chem A. 2000; 104: 9062-9080. doi: 10.1021/jp001507z
31. Wilson AK, Dunning TH Jr. The HSO-SOH isomers revisited. The effect of tight d functions. J Phys Chem A. 2004; 108: 3129-3133. doi: 10.1021/jp037160s
32. Merrick JP, Moran D, Radom L. An evaluation of harmonic vibrational frequency scale factor. J Phys Chem A. 2007; 111: 11683-11700. doi: 10.1021/jp073974n
33. Boys SF, Bernardi F. The calculation of small molecular interactions by the differences of separate total energies. Some procedure with reduced errors. Mol Phys. 1970; 19: 553-566. doi: 10.1080/00268977000101561
34. Curtiss LA, Redfern PC, Smith BJ, Radom L. Gaussian-2 (G2) theory: reduced basis set requirements. J Chem Phys. 1996; 104: 5148-5152. doi: 10.1063/1.471141
35. Curtiss LA, Raghavachari K, Redfern PC, Pople JA. Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of enthalpies of formation. J Chem Phys. 1997; 106: 1063-1079. doi: 10.1063/1.473182
36. Curtiss LA, Redfern PC, Raghavachari K, Pople JA. Assessment of Gaussian-2 and density functional theories for the computation of ionization potentials and electron affinities. J Chem Phys. 1998; 109: 42-55. doi: 10.1063/1.476538
37. Nyden MR, Petersson GA. Complete basis set correlation energies I. The asymptotic convergence of pair natural orbital expansions. J Chem Phys. 1981; 75: 1843-1862. doi: 10.1063/1.442208
38. Petersson GA, Al-Laham MA. A complete basis set model chemistry. II. Open-shell systems and the total energies of the first row atoms. J Chem Phys. 1991; 94: 6081-6090. doi: 10.1063/1.460447
39. Petersson GA, Tensfeldt T, Montgomery JA. A complete basis set model chemistry. III. The complete basis set-quadratic configuration interaction family of methods. J Chem Phys. 1991; 94: 6091-6101. doi: 10.1063/1.460448
40. Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Mennucci B, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Caricato M, Li X, Hratchian HP, Izmaylov AF, Bloino J, Zheng G, Sonnenberg JL, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Montgomery JA, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark M, Heyd JJ, Brothers E, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendel A, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Rega N, Millam JM, Klene M, Knox JE, Cross JB, Bakken V, Adamo C, Jaramillo C, Gomperts R, Stratmann RE, Yazyev O, Austin AJ, Cammi R, Pomelli C, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Zakrzewski VG, Voth GA, Salvador P, Dannenberg JJ, Dapprich S, Daniels AD, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Ortiz JV, Cioslowski J, Fox DJ. Gaussian 09. Wallingford, CT: Gaussian Inc; 2009.
41. Bader RFW. Atoms in molecules: a quantum theory., Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1990.
42. Bader RFW. A quantum theory of molecular structure and its applications. Chem Rev. 1991; 91: 893-928. doi: 10.1021/cr00005a013
43. Bader RFW. Atoms in molecules. In: Schleyer PVR, Allinger NLT, Gasteiger CJ, Kollman PA, Schaefer HFS, III, Schreiner PR, editors. Encyclopedia of computational chemistry. Chichester: Wiley; 1998. p. 64-86.
44. Biegler-König F, Schönbohm J. AIM2000. Version 2.0. Germany; 2002.
45. Jeziorski B, Moszyñski R, Szalewicz K. Perturbation theory approach to intermolecular potential energy surfaces of van der Waals complexes. Chem Rev. 1994; 94: 1887-1930. doi: 10.1021/cr00031a008
46. Moszyński R, Heijmen TGA, Jeziorski BJ. Symmetry adapted perturbation theory for the calculation of hartree-fock interaction energies. Mol Phys. 1996; 88: 741-758.
47. Bukowski R, Cencek W, Jankowski P, Jeziorska M, Jeziorski B, Kucharski SA, Lotrich VF, Misquitta AJ, Moszyński R, Patkowski K, Podeszwa R, Rybak S, Szalewicz K, Williams HL, Wheatley RJ, Wormer PES, Zuchowski PS. SAPT2008: An ab initio program for many-body symmetry adapted perturbation theory calculations of intermolecular interaction energies. Sequential and parallel versions. User's guide. Revision SAPT2008.2. Newark (DE) and Warsaw: University of Delaware and University of Warsaw; 2008.
48. Lee EC, Hong BH, Lee JY, Kim JC, Kim D, Kim YY, Rarakeshwar P, Kim KS. Substituent effects on the edge-to-face aromatic interactions. J Am Chem Soc. 2005; 127: 4530-4537. doi: 10.1021/ja037454r
49. Reed AE, Weinstock RB, Weinhold F. Natural population analysis. J Chem Phys. 1985; 83: 735-746. doi: 10.1063/1.449486
50. Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F. Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor acceptor viewpoint. Chem Rev. 1998; 88: 899-926. doi: 10.1021/cr00088a005
51. Desiraju GR. Hydrogen bridges in crystal engineering: interactions without borders. Acc Chem Res. 2002; 35: 565-573. doi: 10.1021/ar010054t
52. Hideaki U, Morokuma K. The origin of hydrogen bonding: an energy decomposition study. J Am Chem Soc. 1977; 99: 1316-1332. doi: 10.1021/ja00447a007
53. Flukiger P, Luthi HP, Portmann S, Weber J. MOLEKEL 4.3. Manno (Switzerland): Swiss Centre for Scientific Computing; 2000-2002.