The foundations of safety science

Safety Science

Volumn 67, Issue , 2014, Pages 1-5

  Le Coze, Jean Christophe ^a   Pettersen, Kenneth ^b   Reiman, Teemu ^c  

^a INERIS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

^c VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT; ACCIDENT PREVENTION; BIOMEDICAL DISCIPLINES, SCIENCE AND ART; EDITORIAL; ENGINEERING; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL PRACTICE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SAFETY; SAFETY SCIENCE; SCIENTIST; TREND STUDY;

EID: 84897092903     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2014.03.002     Document Type: Editorial

References (24)

1. Almklov P., Rosness R., Størkersen K. When safety science meets the practitioners: Does safety science contribute to marginalization of practical knowledge?. Safety science 2014, 67:25-36.
2. Aven T. What is safety science?. Safety Science 2014, 67:15-20.
3. Bunge M. Emergence and Convergence: Qualitative Novelty and the Unity of Knowledge 2003, University of Toronto Press.
4. Cartdwright N. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science 1999, Cambridge University Press.
5. Dekker S., Nyce J. There is safety in power or power in safety. Safety Science 2014, 67:44-49.
6. Delanty G. Social Science 2005, Open University Press. second ed.
7. Dupré J. Metaphysical disorder and scientific disunity. The Disunity of Science 1996, Stanford University Press. P. Galison, D.J. Sump (Eds.).
8. Gibbons M., Limoges C., Nowotny H., Schwartzman S., Scott P., Trow M. The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contempory societies 1994, Sage.
9. Ghoshal S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Acad. Manage. Learn. Educ. 2005, 4:75-91.
10. Hacking I. The Social Construction of What? 2000, Harvard University Press.
11. Haavik K.T. On the ontology of safety. Safety Science 2014, 67:37-43.
12. Hollnagel E. Is safety a subject for science?. Safety Science 2014, 67:21-24.
13. Hopkins A. Issues in safety science. Safety science 2014, 67:6-14.
14. Jasanoff D. Fields and fallows. A political history of STS. Interdisciplinarity 2013, Reconfigurations of the Social and Natural Sciences, Routledge. A. Barry, G. Born (Eds.).
15. Le Coze J.C. Outlines of a sensitising model for industrial safety assessments. Safety Science 2013, 51:187-201.
16. Le Coze J.C. New models for new times. An anti-dualist move. Safety Science 2013, 59:200-218.
17. Morange M. Les secrets du vivant. La Découverte [The secret of the living] 2012.
18. Mitchell S.D. Unsimple truths. Science, complexity and policy 2009, University of Chicago Press.
19. Pettersen K.A., McDonald N., Engen O.A. Rethinking the role of social theory in socio-technical analysis: a critical realist approach to aircraft maintenance. Cognition, Technology & Work 2010, 12:181-191.
20. Rose S.P.R. Genetics, Reductionism and Autopoiesis. eLS 2012, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester.
21. Taleb N. The Black Swan: The impact of the highly improbable 2007, Penguin Books.
22. Wears W., Hunte G. Seeing patient safety 'Like a State'. Safety Science 2014, 67:50-57.
23. Westrum R. The study of information flow: a personal journey. Safety Science 2014, 67:58-63.
24. Wilson E.O. Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge 1999, Vintage.