Attentional Modulation of the Mere Exposure Effect

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1403-1410

  Yagi, Yoshihiko ^a   Ikoma, Shinobu ^b   Kikuchi, Tadashi ^b  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

affect; mere exposure effect; selective attention

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFFECT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DECISION MAKING; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECALL; RECOGNITION;

ADOLESCENT; AFFECT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; FEMALE; HUMANS; JUDGMENT; MALE; MENTAL RECALL; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 71649097588     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0017396     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Anand P., and Sternthal B. Perceptual fluency and affect without cognition. Memory & Cognition 19 (1991) 293-300
2. Bornstein R.F. Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1967-1987. Psychological Bulletin 106 (1989) 265-289
3. Bornstein R.F., and D'Agostino P.R. Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63 (1992) 545-552
4. Bornstein R.F., and D'Agostino P.R. The attribution and discounting of perceptual fluency: Preliminary tests of a perceptual fluency/attributional model of the mere exposure effect. Social Cognition 12 (1994) 103-128
5. Bornstein R.F., Kale A.R., and Cornell K.R. Boredom as a limiting condition on the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58 (1990) 791-800
6. Craver-Lemley C., and Bornstein R.F. Self-generated visual imagery alters the mere exposure effect. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 1056-1060
7. DeSchepper B., and Treisman A. Visual memory for novel shapes: Implicit coding without attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 22 (1996) 27-47
8. Elliott R., and Dolan R.J. Neural response during preference and memory judgments for subliminally presented stimuli: A functional neuroimaging study. The Journal of Neuroscience 18 (1998) 4697-4704
9. Fenske M.J., and Raymond J.E. Affective influence of selective attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science 15 (2006) 312-316
10. Fenske M.J., Raymond J.E., Kessler K., Westoby N., and Tipper S.P. Attentional inhibition has social-emotional consequences for unfamiliar faces. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 753-758
11. Fenske M.J., Raymond J.E., and Kunar M.A. The affective consequences of visual attention in preview search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 1055-1061
12. Goolsby B.A., Shapiro K.L., and Raymond J.E. Distractor devaluation requires visual working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 16 (2009) 133-138
13. Goolsby B.A., Shapiro K.L., Silvert L., Kiss M., Fragopanagos N., and Taylor J.G. Feature-based inhibition underlies the affective consequences of attention. Visual Cognition 17 (2009) 500-530
14. Griffiths O., and Mitchell C.J. Negative priming reduces affective ratings. Cognition & Emotion 22 (2007) 1119-1129
15. Halpern A.R., and O'Connor M.G. Implicit memory for music in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology 14 (2000) 391-397
16. Jacoby L.L., Kelley C.M., and Dywan J. Memory attributions. In: Roediger H.L., and Craik F.I.M. (Eds). Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (1989), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 391-422
17. Kiss M., Goolsby B.A., Raymond J.E., Shapiro K.L., Silvert L., and Eimer M. Efficient attentional selection predicts distractor devaluation: Event-related potential evidence for a direct link between attention and emotion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19 (2007) 1316-1322
18. Kunst-Wilson W.R., and Zajonc R.B. Affective discrimination of stimuli that cannot be recognized. Science 207 (1980) 557-558
19. Lavie N. Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 21 (1995) 451-468
20. Lavie N. Selective attention and cognitive control: Dissociating attentional function through different type of load. In: Monsell S., and Driver J. (Eds). Control of cognitive processes: Attention and performance XVIII (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA 175-194
21. Lavie N., and Fox E. The role of perceptual load in negative priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1038-1052
22. Liao H.-I., and Shimojo S. Novelty vs. familiarity principles in preference decision: Task-context of memory matters. Journal of Vision [Abstract] 8 (2008) 522a. http://journalofvision.org/8/6/522/ Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/8/6/522/
23. Mandler G., Nakamura Y., and Van Zandt B.J.S. Nonspecific effects of exposure on stimuli that cannot be recognized. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 13 (1987) 646-648
24. Matlin M.W. Response competition, recognition, and affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 19 (1971) 295-300
25. Monahan J.L., Murphy S.T., and Zajonc R.B. Subliminal mere exposure: Specific, general, and diffuse effects. Psychological Science 11 (2000) 462-466
26. Moreland R.L., and Zajonc R.B. Is stimulus recognition a necessary condition for the occurrence of exposure effects?. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35 (1977) 191-199
27. Neill W.T. Inhibitory and facilitatory processes in selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 3 (1977) 444-450
28. Raymond J.E., Fenske M.J., and Tavassoli N. Selective attention determines emotional responses to novel visual stimuli. Psychological Science 14 (2003) 537-542
29. Raymond J.E., Fenske M.J., and Westoby N. Emotional devaluation of distracting patterns and faces: A consequence of attentional inhibition during visual search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 1404-1415
30. Rock I., and Gutman D. The effect of inattention and form perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 7 (1981) 275-285
31. Seamon J.G., Williams P.C., Crowley M.J., Kim I.J., Langer S.A., Orne P.J., and Wishengrad D.L. The mere exposure effect is based on implicit memory: Effects of stimulus type, encoding conditions, and number of exposures on recognition and affect judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 21 (1995) 711-721
32. Shimojo E., Park J., Kashino M., and Shimojo S. Familiarity for faces and novelty for natural scenes in preference: Does similarity matter?. Journal of Vision [Abstract] 8 (2008) 1137a. http://journalofvision.org/8/6/1137/ Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/8/6/1137/
33. Shimojo E., Park J., Lebon L., Schleim S., and Shimojo S. Familiarity vs. novelty principles for preference [Abstract]. Journal of Vision 7 (2007) 933a. http://journalofvision.org/7/9/933/ Retrieved from http://journalofvision.org/7/9/933/
34. Shimojo S., Simion C., Shimojo E., and Scheier C. Gaze bias both reflects and influences preference. Nature Neuroscience 6 (2003) 1317-1322
35. Simion C., and Shimojo S. Early interactions between orienting, visual sampling and decision making in facial preference. Vision Research 46 (2006) 3331-3335
36. Tipper S.P. The negative priming effect: Inhibitory effects of ignored primes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 37 (1985) 571-590
37. Vanderplas J.M., and Garvin E.A. The association value of random shapes. Journal of Experimental Psychology 57 (1959) 147-154
38. Veling H., Holland R.W., and van Knippenberg A. Devaluation of distracting stimuli. Cognition & Emotion 21 (2007) 442-448
39. Vuilleumier P., Schwartz S., Duhoux S., Dolan R.J., and Driver J. Selective attention modulates neural substrates of repetition priming and "implicit" visual memory: Suppressions and enhancements revealed by fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17 (2005) 1245-1260
40. Whittlesea B.W.A. Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 19 (1993) 1235-1253
41. Whittlesea B.W.A., and Price J.R. Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition 29 (2001) 234-246
42. Willems S., and Van der Linden M. Mere exposure effect: A consequence of direct and indirect fluency-preference links. Consciousness and Cognition 15 (2006) 323-341
43. Wilson W.R. Feeling more than we can know: Exposure effects without learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 811-821
44. Winkielman P., and Cacioppo J.T. Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 81 (2001) 989-1000
45. Zajonc R.B. Attitudinal effects of mere exposure [Monograph supplement]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Monograph Supplement 9 2, Pt. 2 (1968) 1-27