Integrated metrics for improving the life cycle approach to assessing product system sustainability

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 1386-1413

  Ingwersen, Wesley ^a   Cabezas, Heriberto ^a   Weisbrod, Anne V ^b   Eason, Tarsha ^a   Demeke, Bayou ^a   Ceja, Manuel ^b  

^a Cissy)   (United States)

^b PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

Consumer products; Ecological footprint; Emergy; Fisher information; Green net value added; Life cycle assessment; Product sustainability; Sustainability indicators; Sustainability metrics

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT; EMERGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INTEGRATED APPROACH; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 84897042801     PISSN: 20711050     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su6031386     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.H.; Krausmann, F.; Gaube, V.; Bondeau, A.; Plutzar, C.; Gingrich, S.; Lucht, W.; Fischer-Kowalski, M. Quantifying and mapping the human appropriation of net primary production in earth's terrestrial ecosystems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 12942-12947.
2. Running, S. A measurable planetary boundary for the biosphere. Science 2012, 337, 1458-1459.
3. Wackernagel, M.; Schulz, N.B.; Deumling, D.; Linares, A.C.; Jenkins, M.; Kapos, V.; Monfreda, C.; Loh, J.; Myers, N.; Norgaard, R.; et al. Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 9266-9271.
4. UN. A 10-Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production Patterns. In Proceedings of the Rio+20 UN Conference on Sustainable Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20-22 June 2012.
5. NAS. Sustainability and the U.S. EPA; Committee on Incorporating Sustainability in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences: Washington, DC, USA, 2011.
6. NAS. Science in the EPA-The Road Ahead; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2012.
7. US EPA. Life Cycle Assessment: Principles and Practice; National Risk Management Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2006.
8. ISO 14044: Environmental Management-Life Cycle Assessment-Requirements and Guidelines; International Standards Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
9. Bare, J.; Gloria, T. Environmental impact assessment taxonomy providing comprehensive coverage of midpoints, endpoints, damages, and areas of protection. J. Clean Prod. 2008, 16, 1021-1035.
10. Bare, J. Life cycle impact assessment research developments and needs. Clean Technol. Envir. 2010, 12, 341-351.
11. Benoît, C.; Mazijn, B. Guidelines for Social Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Available online: http://www.unep.fr/shared/publications/pdf/DTIx1164xPA-guidelines_sLCA.pdf (accessed on 21 December 2013).
12. Zamagni, A.; Pesonen, H.L.; Swarr, T. From LCA to life cycle sustainability assessment: Concept, practice and future directions. Int. J. LCA 2013, 18, 1637-1641.
13. Valdivia, S.; Ugaya, C.M.L.; Sonnemon, G.; Hildenbrand, J. Towards a Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: Making Informed Choices on Products; UNEP: Paris, France, 2011.
14. Norris, G.A. Integrating life cycle cost analysis and LCA. Int. J. LCA 2001, 6, 118-121.
15. Weidema, B.P. The integration of economic and social aspects in life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. LCA 2006, 11, 89-96.
16. Mazijn, B.; Doom, R.; Peeters, H.; Spillemaeckers, S.; Vanhoutte, G.; Taverniers, L.; Lavrysen, L.; VanBraeckel, D.; Rivera, D. Ecological, Social and Economical Aspects of Integrated Product Policy-Integrated Product Assessment and the Development of the Label "Sustainable Development": Final Report. Available online: http://www.bernardmazijn.be/fileadmin/pdf/sd-label_products_bernardmazijn.pdf (accessed on 13 November 2013).
17. Dreyer, L.C.; Hauschild, M.Z. A framework for social life cycle impact assessment. Int. J. LCA 2006, 11, 88-97.
18. Dreyer, L.C.; Hauschild, M.Z.; Schierbeck, J. Characterisation of social impacts in LCA. Int. J. LCA 2010, 15, 247-259.
19. Hunkeler, D. Societal LCA methodology and case study. Int. J. LCA 2006, 11, 371-382.
20. Norris, G.A. Social impacts in product life cycles: Towards life cycle attribute assessment. Int. J. LCA 2006, 11, 97-104.
21. Labuschagne, C.; Brent, A.C. Social indicators for sustainable product and technology life cycle management in the process Industry. Int. J. LCA 2006, 11, 3-15.
22. Fiksel, J.; Eason, T.; Frederickson, H. A Framework for Sustainability Indicators at EPA; National Risk Management Research Laboratory: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2012.
23. Samson, R.; Lafontaine, M.; Saad, R.; Tom, M.; Charron-Doucet, F.; Clement, E.; Couture, J.M.; Lamarche, V.; Gilbert, D.; Reveret, J.P.; et al. Environmental and Socioeconomic Life Cycle Assessment of Canadian Milk. Available online: https://www.dairyresearch.ca/file.php?filename=/var/www/cdrplive/files/news/19/LCA-DFCExecSum_e.pdf (accessed on 3 December 2013).
24. Friedberg, S. Calculating sustainability in supply chain capitalism. Econ. Soc. 2013, 42, 571-596.
25. Hoof, G.; Vieira, M.; Gausman, M.; Weisbrod, A. Indicator selection in life cycle assessment to enable decision making: Issues and solutions. Int. J. LCA 2013, 18, 1-13.
26. Mark Goedkoop, M.; Sprienm, R. PRe The Eco-Indicator 99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment. Avialable online: http://www.pre-sustainability.com/download/misc/EI99_annexe_v3.pdf (accessed on 12 September 2013).
27. Itsubo, N.; Inaba, A. LIME-A Comprehensive Japanese LCIA Methodology Based on Endpoint Modeling. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on EcoBalance, Tsukuba, Japan, 25-27 October 2004.
28. Morgan, M.G.; Henrion, M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 1990.
29. Morgan, M.G.; Keith, D.W. Subjective Judgments by Climate Experts. Env. Sci. Tech. 1995, 29, 465A-476A.
30. Morgan, M.G.; Florig, H.K.; DeKaye, M.L.; Fischbeck, P. Categorizing risks for risk ranking. Risk Anal. 2000, 20, 49-58.
31. Tversky, A.; Kahneman, D. Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 1974, 185, 1124-1131.
32. Margni, M.; Curran, M.A. Life cycle impact assessment. In Life Cycle Assessment Handbook: A Guide for Environmentally Sustainable Products; Curran, M.A., Ed.; Scriviner: Beverely, MA, USA, 2012.
33. Cabezas, H. Sustainability indicators and metrics. In Sustainability: Multidisciplinary Perspectives; Cabezas, H., Diwekar, U.M., Eds.; Bethem Science: Sharjah, UAE. Available online: http://public.eblib.com/EBLPublic/PublicView.do?ptiID=1049021 (accessed on 3 November 2013).
34. Saisana, M.; Tarantola, S. State-of-the-Art Report on Current Methodologies and Practices for Composite Indicator Development. Available online: http://en.youscribe.com/catalogue/reports-and-theses/state-of-the-art-report-on-current-methodologies-and-practices-for-1122162 (accessed on 1 November 2013).
35. Environmental Sustainability Index: Benchmarking National Environmental Stewardship. Available online: http://www.yale.edu/esi/ESI2005_Main_Report.pdf (accessed on 17 December 2013).
36. Campbell, D.E.; Garmestani, A.S. An energy systems view of sustainability: Emergy evaluation of the San Luis Basin, Colorado. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 95, 72-97.
37. Eason, T.; Cabezas, H. Evaluating the sustainability of a regional system using Fisher information in the San Luis Basin, Colorado. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 94, 41-49.
38. Heberling, M.T.; Templeton, J.J.; Wu, S. Green Net Regional Product for the San Luis Basin, Colorado: An economic measure of regional sustainability. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111, 287-297.
39. Hopton, M.E.; Cabezas, H.; Campbell, D.; Eason, T.; Garmestani, A.S.; Heberling, M.T.; Karunanithi, A.T.; Templeton, J.J.; White, D.; Zanowick, M. Development of a multidisciplinary approach to assess regional sustainability. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol. 2010, 17, 48-56.
40. Hopton, M.E.; White, D. A simplified ecological footprint at a regional scale. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111, 279-286.
41. US EPA. San Luis Basin Sustainability Metrics Project: A Methodology for Evaluating Regional Sustainability; United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, National Risk Management Research Laboratory: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2010.
42. Foley, J.A.; DeFries, R.; Asner, G.P.; Barford, C.; Bonan, G.; Carpenter, S.R.; Chapin, F.S.; Coe, M.T.; Daily, G.C.; Gibbs, H.K. Global consequences of land use. Science 2005, 309, 570-574.
43. Haberl, H.; Wackernagel, M.; Wrbka, T. Land use and sustainability indicators. An introduction. Land Use Pol. 2004, 21, 193-198.
44. Wackernagel, M.; Rees, W. Our Ecological Footprint-Reducing Human Impact on the Earth; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 1996; p. 160.
45. Solomon, S., Qin, D., Manning, M., Chen, Z., Marquis, M., Averyt, K.B., Tignor, M., Miller, H.L., Eds. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2007; Cambridge University Press: New York, NY, USA, 2007.
46. Bare, J.C.; Norris, G.A.; Pennington, D.W.; McKone, T. TRACI: The tool for the reduction and assessment of chemical and other environmental impacts. J. Ind. Ecol. 2002, 6, 49-78.
47. Lee, S.-J.; Hawkins, T.; Ingwersen, W.; Young, D. Exploring the use of ecological footprint in life cycle impact assessment: Findings from a comparison of transportation fuels J. Ind. Ecol. 2014, accepted.
48. Rugani, B.; Huijbregts, M.A.J.; Mutel, C.; Bastianoni, S.; Hellweg, S. Solar energy demand (SED) of commodity life cycles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 5426-5433.
49. Ness, B.; Urbel-Piirsalu, E.; Anderberg, S.; Olsson, L. Categorising tools for sustainability assessment. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 60, 498-508.
50. Ingwersen, W.W. Emergy as a life cycle impact assessment indicator: A gold mining case study. J. Ind. Ecol. 2011, 15, 550-567.
51. Atkinson, G. Measuring corporate sustainability. J. Environ. Plann. Manag. 2000, 43, 235-252.
52. Riahi-Belkaoui, A. Net value added and earnings determination. Rev. Quant. Finance Acc. 1999, 13, 393-399.
53. Krewitt, W.; Heck, T.; Trukenmuller, A.; Friedrich, R. Environmental damage costs from fossil electricity generation in Germany and Europe. Energy Pol. 1999, 27, 173-183.
54. Muller, N.Z.; Mendelsohn, R. Measuring the damages of air pollution in the United States. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2007, 54, 1-14.
55. Muller, N.Z.; Mendelsohn, R. The Air Pollution Emission Experiments and Policy Analysis Model (APEEP). Available online: http://www.econ.yale.edu/~nordhaus/Resources/muller_JEEM_ Appendix.pdf (accessed on 4 April 2013).
56. Muller, N.Z.; Mendelsohn, R.; Nordhaus, W. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. Amer. Econ. Rev. 2011, 101, 1649-1675.
57. Tol, R.S.J. The Social Cost of Carbon: Trends, Outliers and Catastrophes. Available online: http://www.economics-ejournal.org/economics/discussionpapers/2007-44 (accessed on 2 February 2013).
58. US-EPA. Guidlines for Preparing Economic Analysis. Available online: http://yosemite.epa.gov/ee/epa/eerm.nsf/vwAN/EE-0568-50.pdf/$file/EE-0568-50.pdf (accessed on 4 February 2013).
59. Fann, N.; Baker, K.R.; Fulcher, C.M. Characterizing the PM2.5-related health benefits of emission reductions for 17 industrial, area and mobile emission sectors across the U.S. Environ. Int. 2012, 49, 141-151.
60. Voinov, A.; Farley, J. Reconciling sustainability, systems theory and discounting. Ecol. Econ. 2007, 63, 104-113.
61. Fath, B.D.; Cabezas, H.; Pawlowski, C.W. Regime changes in ecological systems: An information theory approach. J. Theor. Biol. 2003, 222, 517-530.
62. Fisher, R.A. On the mathematical foundations of theoretical statistics. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. 1922, 222, 309-368.
63. Mayer, A.L.; Pawlowski, C.W.; Fath, B.D.; Cabezas, H. Applications of fisher information to the sustainable management of environmental systems. In Exploratory Data Analysis Using Fisher Information; Frieden, B.R., Gatenby, R.A., Eds.; Springer: London, UK, 2007; pp. 217-244.
64. Karunanithi, A.T.; Cabezas, H.; Frieden, B.R.; Pawlowski, C.W. Detection and assessment of ecosystem regime shifts from fisher information. Ecol. Soc. 2008, 13, Article 22.
65. Eason, T.; Garmestani, A. Cross-scale dynamics of a regional urban system through time. Région Dével. 2012, 36, 55-77.
66. Eason, T. A Framework for Sustainability Indicators at EPA; US Environmental Protection Agency: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2012.
67. Gonzalez-Mejia, A.M. Fisher Information-Sustainability Analysis of Several US Metropolitan Statistical Areas. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA, 2011.
68. Gonzalez-Mejía, A.M.; Eason, T.N.; Cabezas, H.; Suidan, M.T. Assessing Sustainability in Real Urban Systems: The Greater Cincinnati Metropolitan Area in Ohio, Kentucky, and Indiana. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2012, 46, 9620-9629.
69. Haberl, H.; Erb, K.-H.; Gingrich, S.; Kastner, T.; Krausmann, F. Human appropriation of net primary production, stocks and flows of carbon, and biodiversity. In Ecosystem Services and Carbon Sequestration in the Biosphere; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2013; pp. 313-331.
70. Gong, M.; Wall, G. On exergy and sustainable development-Part 2: Indicators and methods. Int. J. Exergy 2001, 1, 217-233.
71. Fath, B.D.; Scharler, U.M.; Ulanowicz, R.E.; Hannon, B. Ecological network analysis: Network construction. Ecol. Model. 2007, 208, 49-55.
72. Zhang, Y.; Baral, A.; Bakshi, B.R. Accounting for ecosystem services in life cycle assessment, part II: Toward an ecologically based LCA. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 2624-2631.
73. Andersen, M.; Skjoett-Larsen, T. Corporate social responsibility in global supply chains. Supply Chain Manag. 2009, 14, 75-86.
74. Vance, L.; Cabezas, H.; Heckl, I.; Bertok, B.; Friedler, F. Synthesis of sustainable energy supply chain by the P-graph framework. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 52, 266-274.
75. Michalek, J.J.; Chester, M.; Jaramillo, P.; Samaras, C.; Shiau, C.-S.N.; Lave, L.B. Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 16554-16558.
76. National Research Council. Hidden Costs of Energy: Unpriced Consequences of Energy Production and Use; The National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2010.
77. Odum, H.T. Environmental Accounting; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1996.
78. Mayer, A.L. Strengths and weaknesses of common sustainability indices for multidimensional systems. Environ. Int. 2008, 34, 277-291.
79. Raugei, M.; Rugani, B.; Benetto, E.; Ingwersen, W.W. Integrating Emergy into LCA: Potential added value and lingering obstacles. Ecol. Model. 2014, 271, 4-9.
80. Finnveden, G. Valuation methods within LCA-Where are the values? Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 1997, 2, 163-169.
81. Reap, J.; Roman, F.; Duncan, S.; Bras, B. A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2008, 13, 374-388.
82. Schmidt, J.H. Development of LCIA characterisation factors for land use impacts on biodiversity. J. Clean Prod. 2008, 16, 1929-1942.
83. Pfister, S.; Koehler, A.; Hellweg, S. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ. Sci. Tech. 2009, 43, 4098-4104.
84. Lenzen, M. Uncertainty in Impact and Externality Assessments-Implications for Decision-Making. Int. J. LCA 2006, 11, 189-199.
85. Beynon, M.J.; Munday, M. Considering the effects of imprecision and uncertainty in ecological footprint estimation: An approach in a fuzzy environment. Ecol. Econ. 2008, 67, 373-383.
86. Ingwersen, W.W. Uncertainty characterization for emergy values. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221, 445-452.
87. Li, L.; Lu, H.; Campbell, D.E.; Ren, H. Methods for estimating the uncertainty in emergy table-form models. Ecol. Model. 2011, 222, 2615-2622.