Effect of temporal resolution on 4D flow MRI in the portal circulation

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 819-826

  Landgraf, Benjamin R ^a   Johnson, Kevin M ^b   Roldán Alzate, Alejandro ^a   Francois, Christopher J ^a   Wieben, Oliver ^a,b,c   Reeder, Scott B ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c Wisconsin Electric Machines and Power Electronics Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

diffuse liver disease; flow sensitive 4D MR; hemodynamics; portal hypertension; portal venous flow; velocity mapping

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FLOW MEASUREMENT; FOUR DIMENSIONAL FLOW MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HEART CYCLE; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LIVER CIRRHOSIS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; PORTAL HYPERTENSION; PORTAL VEIN BLOOD FLOW; PORTAL VEIN THROMBOSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PULSATILE FLOW; RESPIRATORY GATED IMAGING; SUPERIOR MESENTERIC VEIN; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

DIFFUSE LIVER DISEASE; FLOW-SENSITIVE 4D MR; HEMODYNAMICS; PORTAL HYPERTENSION; PORTAL VENOUS FLOW; VELOCITY MAPPING;

ADULT; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; FEMALE; FIBROSIS; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LIVER CIRCULATION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; PORTAL VEIN; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 84897027048     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24233     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Koff RS, Dienstag JL,. Extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C and the association with alcoholic liver disease. Semin Liver Dis 1995; 15: 101-109.
2. Yeh MM, Brunt EM,. Pathology of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Am J Clin Pathol 2007; 128: 837-847.
3. Rockey DC,. Hepatic blood flow regulation by stellate cells in normal and injured liver. Semin Liver Dis 2001; 21: 337-349.
4. Bari K, Garcia-Tsao G,. Treatment of portal hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18: 1166-1175.
5. D'Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L,. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol 2006; 44: 217-231.
6. Perello A, Escorsell A, Bru C, et al. Wedged hepatic venous pressure adequately reflects portal pressure in hepatitis C virus-related cirrhosis. Hepatology 1999; 30: 1393-1397.
7. Groszmann RJ, Garcia-Tsao G, Bosch J, et al. Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2254-2261.
8. Ripoll C, Groszmann R, Garcia-Tsao G, et al. Hepatic venous pressure gradient predicts clinical decompensation in patients with compensated cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2007; 133: 481-488.
9. Berzigotti A, Ashkenazi E, Reverter E, Abraldes JG, Bosch J,. Non-invasive diagnostic and prognostic evaluation of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Dis Markers 2011; 31: 129-138.
10. D'Amico G, Garcia-Pagan JC, Luca A, Bosch J,. Hepatic vein pressure gradient reduction and prevention of variceal bleeding in cirrhosis: a systematic review. Gastroenterology 2006; 131: 1611-1624.
11. Thalheimer U, Bellis L, Puoti C, Burroughs AK,. Should we routinely measure portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis, using hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) as a guide for prophylaxis and therapy of bleeding and rebleeding? No. Eur J Intern Med 2011; 22: 5-7.
12. Gouya H, Vignaux O, Sogni P, et al. Chronic liver disease: systemic and splanchnic venous flow mapping with optimized cine phase-contrast MR imaging validated in a phantom model and prospectively evaluated in patients. Radiology 2011; 261: 144-155.
13. Zhang L, Yin J, Duan Y, Yang Y, Yuan L, Cao T,. Assessment of intrahepatic blood flow by Doppler ultrasonography: relationship between the hepatic vein, portal vein, hepatic artery and portal pressure measured intraoperatively in patients with portal hypertension. BMC Gastroenterol 2011; 11: 84.
14. Chawla Y, Santa N, Dhiman RK, Dilawari JB,. Portal hemodynamics by duplex Doppler sonography in different grades of cirrhosis. Dig Dis Sci 1998; 43: 354-357.
15. Finn JP, Kane RA, Edelman RR, et al. Imaging of the portal venous system in patients with cirrhosis: MR angiography vs duplex Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 161: 989-994.
16. de Vries PJ, van Hattum J, Hoekstra JB, de Hooge P,. Duplex Doppler measurements of portal venous flow in normal subjects. Inter- and intra-observer variability. J Hepatol 1991; 13: 358-363.
17. Lim AK, Patel N, Eckersley RJ, et al. Can Doppler sonography grade the severity of hepatitis C-related liver disease? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1848-1853.
18. Stankovic Z, Csatari Z, Deibert P, et al. Normal and altered three-dimensional portal venous hemodynamics in patients with liver cirrhosis. Radiology 2012; 262: 862-873.
19. Stankovic Z, Frydrychowicz A, Csatari Z, et al. MR-based visualization and quantification of three-dimensional flow characteristics in the portal venous system. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32: 466-475.
20. Gu T, Korosec FR, Block WF, et al. PC VIPR: a high-speed 3D phase-contrast method for flow quantification and high-resolution angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 743-749.
21. Johnson KM, Lum DP, Turski PA, Block WF, Mistretta CA, Wieben O,. Improved 3D phase contrast MRI with off-resonance corrected dual echo VIPR. Magn Reson Med 2008; 60: 1329-1336.
22. Frydrychowicz A, Landgraf BR, Niespodzany E, et al. Four-dimensional velocity mapping of the hepatic and splanchnic vasculature with radial sampling at 3 Tesla: a feasibility study in portal hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011; 34: 577-584.
23. Roldan-Alzate A, Frydrychowicz A, Niespodzany E, et al. In vivo validation of 4D flow MRI for assessing the hemodynamics of portal hypertension. J Magn Reson Imaging 2013; 37: 1100-1108.
24. Goncalvesova E, Lesny P, Luknar M, Solik P, Varga I,. Changes of portal flow in heart failure patients with liver congestion. Bratisl Lek Listy 2010; 111: 635-639.
25. Barakat M,. Portal vein pulsatility and spectral width changes in patients with portal hypertension: relation to the severity of liver disease. Br J Radiol 2002; 75: 417-421.
26. Johnson KM, Markl M,. Improved SNR in phase contrast velocimetry with five-point balanced flow encoding. Magn Reson Med 2010; 63: 349-355.
27. Francois CJ, Lum DP, Johnson KM, et al. Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast. Radiology 2011; 258: 254-260.
28. Beatty PJ, Nishimura DG, Pauly JM,. Rapid gridding reconstruction with a minimal oversampling ratio. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005; 24: 799-808.
29. McKenzie CA, Yeh EN, Ohliger MA, Price MD, Sodickson DK,. Self-calibrating parallel imaging with automatic coil sensitivity extraction. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47: 529-538.
30. Liu J, Redmond MJ, Brodsky EK, et al. Generation and visualization of four-dimensional MR angiography data using an undersampled 3-D projection trajectory. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2006; 25: 148-157.
31. Bernstein MA, Zhou XJ, Polzin JA, et al. Concomitant gradient terms in phase contrast MR: analysis and correction. Magn Reson Med 1998; 39: 300-308.
32. Walker PG, Cranney GB, Scheidegger MB, Waseleski G, Pohost GM, Yoganathan AP,. Semiautomated method for noise reduction and background phase error correction in MR phase velocity data. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993; 3: 521-530.
33. Urness T, Interrante V, Longmire E, Marusic I, O'Neill S, Jones TW,. Strategies for the visualization of multiple 2D vector fields. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2006; 26: 74-82.