Quantitative measurement of femoral condyle cartilage in the knee by MRI: Validation study by multireaders

Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 972-977

  Fujinaga, Yasunari ^a,b   Yoshioka, Hiroshi ^a   Sakai, Toshinori ^c   Sakai, Yoko ^c   Souza, Felipe ^d   Lang, Philipp ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b SHINSHU UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

^d BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

knee cartilage; magnetic resonance imaging; reproducibility; segmentation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; FEMUR CONDYLE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KNEE CARTILAGE; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

KNEE CARTILAGE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; REPRODUCIBILITY; SEGMENTATION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84897026567     PISSN: 10531807     EISSN: 15222586     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24217     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Doherty M, Hutton C, Bayliss MT,. Osteoarthritis. In:, Maddison PJ, Isenberg DA, Woo P, Glass DN, editors. Oxford textbook of rheumatology. Oxford, New York, Tokyo: Oxford University Press; 1993. p 959-983.
2. Cicuttini F, Forbes A, Asbeutah A, Morris K, Stuckey S,. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. J Orthop Res 2000; 18: 580-584.
3. Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Durr A, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F,. Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44: 2072-2077.
4. Disler DG,. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging: assessment of articular and physeal hyaline cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 169: 1117-1123.
5. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG, et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996; 167: 127-132.
6. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Wirth CR, Fuchs MD,. Detection of knee hyaline cartilage defects using fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MR imaging: comparison with standard MR imaging and correlation with arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995; 165: 377-382.
7. McCauley TR, Kier R, Lynch KJ, Jokl P,. Chondromalacia patellae: diagnosis with MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992; 158: 101-105.
8. Peterfy CG, Majumdar S, Lang P, van Dijke CF, Sack K, Genant HK,. MR imaging of the arthritic knee: improved discrimination of cartilage, synovium, and effusion with pulsed saturation transfer and fat-suppressed T1-weighted sequences. Radiology 1994; 191: 413-419.
9. Peterfy CG, van Dijke CF, Janzen DL, et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 1994; 192: 485-491.
10. Potter HG, Linklater JM, Allen AA, Hannafin JA, Haas SB,. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage in the knee. An evaluation with use of fast-spin-echo imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998; 80: 1276-1284.
11. Broderick LS, Turner DA, Renfrew DL, Schnitzer TJ, Huff JP, Harris C,. Severity of articular cartilage abnormality in patients with osteoarthritis: evaluation with fast spin-echo MR vs arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1994; 162: 99-103.
12. Recht MP, Piraino DW, Paletta GA, Schils JP, Belhobek GH,. Accuracy of fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo FLASH MR imaging in the detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage abnormalities. Radiology 1996; 198: 209-212.
13. Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Genovese M, Dillingham MF, Lang P,. Articular cartilage of knee: normal patterns at MR imaging that mimic disease in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Radiology 2004; 231: 31-38.
14. Gandy SJ, Dieppe PA, Keen MC, Maciewicz RA, Watt I, Waterton JC,. No loss of cartilage volume over three years in patients with knee osteoarthritis as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 929-937.
15. Graichen H, Springer V, Flaman T, et al. Validation of high-resolution water-excitation magnetic resonance imaging for quantitative assessment of thin cartilage layers. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000; 8: 106-114.
16. Hyhlik-Durr A, Faber S, Burgkart R, et al. Precision of tibial cartilage morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence. Eur Radiol 2000; 10: 297-303.
17. Yoshioka H, Stevens K, Hargreaves BA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage of the knee: comparison between fat-suppressed three-dimensional SPGR imaging, fat-suppressed FSE imaging, and fat-suppressed three-dimensional DEFT imaging, and correlation with arthroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 857-864.
18. Hargreaves BA, Gold GE, Lang PK, et al. MR imaging of articular cartilage using driven equilibrium. Magn Reson Med 1999; 42: 695-703.
19. Reeder SB, Pelc NJ, Alley MT, Gold GE,. Rapid MR imaging of articular cartilage with steady-state free precession and multipoint fat-water separation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 357-362.
20. Hardy PA, Recht MP, Piraino D, Thomasson D,. Optimization of a dual echo in the steady state (DESS) free-precession sequence for imaging cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 329-335.
21. Simon EM, McCaffery S, Rowley HA, Fischbein NJ, Shimikawa A, O'Brien JM,. High-resolution 3D T2-weighted fast spin echo: new applications in the orbit. Neuroradiology 2003; 45: 489-492.
22. Eckstein F, Hudelmaier M, Wirth W, et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 2006; 65: 433-441.
23. Hardya PA, Newmark R, Liu YM, et al. The influence of the resolution and contrast on measuring the articular cartilage volume in magnetic resonance images. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 965-972.
24. Duryea J, Neumann G, Brem MH, et al. Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007; 15: 487-492.
25. Brem MH, Lang PK, Neumann G, et al. Magnetic resonance image segmentation using semi-automated software for quantification of knee articular cartilage-initial evaluation of a technique for paired scans. Skeletal Radiol 2009; 38: 505-511.
26. Bauer JS, Krause SJ, Ross CJ, et al. Volumetric cartilage measurements of porcine knee at 1.5-T and 3.0-T MR imaging: evaluation of precision and accuracy. Radiology 2006; 241: 399-406.
27. Pessis E, Drape JL, Ravaud P, Chevrot A, Dougados M, Ayral X,. Assessment of progression in knee osteoarthritis: results of a 1 year study comparing arthroscopy and MRI. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2003; 11: 361-369.
28. Driban JB, Lo GH, Lee JY, et al. Quantitative bone marrow lesion size in osteoarthritic knees correlates with cartilage damage and predicts longitudinal cartilage loss. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2011; 12: 217.
29. Frank LR, Brossmann J, Buxton RB, Resnick D,. MR imaging truncation artifacts can create a false laminar appearance in cartilage. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 547-554.
30. Schmid MR, Pfirrmann CW, Koch P, Zanetti M, Kuehn B, Hodler J,. Imaging of patellar cartilage with a 2D multiple-echo data image combination sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005; 184: 1744-1748.