Novel fast semi-automated software to segment cartilage for knee MR acquisitions

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 487-492

  Duryea, J ^a   Neumann, G ^a   Brem, M H ^a   Koh, W ^a   Noorbakhsh, F ^a   Jackson, R D ^b   Yu, J ^b   Eaton, C B ^c   Lang, P ^a  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MEMORIAL HOSPITAL OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Cartilage; Magnetic resonance imaging; Osteoarthritis; Segmentation; Software

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTICULAR CARTILAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMUR; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEADY STATE; THICKNESS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIBIA; VALIDATION STUDY;

CARTILAGE, ARTICULAR; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 34247603040     PISSN: 10634584     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2006.11.002     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Gray M.L., Eckstein F., Peterfy C., Dahlberg L., Kim Y.J., and Sorensen A.G. Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res (2004) S175-S181
2. Eckstein F., Ateshian G., Burgkart R., Burstein D., Cicuttini F., Dardzinski B., et al. Proposal for a nomenclature for Magnetic Resonance Imaging based measures of articular cartilage in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14 (2006) 974-983
3. Bauer D.C., Hunter D.J., Abramson S.B., Attur M., Corr M., Felson D., et al. Classification of osteoarthritis biomarkers: a proposed approach. Osteoarthritis Cartilage (2006) 723-727
4. Biswal S., Hastie T., Andriacchi T.P., Bergman G.A., Dillingham M.F., and Lang P. Risk factors for progressive cartilage loss in the knee: a longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study in forty-three patients. Arthritis Rheum 46 (2002) 2884-2892
5. Peterfy C.G., Guermazi A., Zaim S., Tirman P.F., Miaux Y., White D., et al. Whole-Organ Magnetic Resonance Imaging Score (WORMS) of the knee in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 12 (2004) 177-190
6. Peterfy C.G., van Dijke C.F., Janzen D.L., Gluer C.C., Namba R., Majumdar S., et al. Quantification of articular cartilage in the knee with pulsed saturation transfer subtraction and fat-suppressed MR imaging: optimization and validation. Radiology 192 (1994) 485-491
7. Solloway S., Hutchinson C.E., Waterton J.C., and Taylor C.J. The use of active shape models for making thickness measurements of articular cartilage from MR images. Magn Reson Med 37 (1997) 943-952
8. Kshirsagar A.A., Watson P.J., Tyler J.A., and Hall L.D. Measurement of localized cartilage volume and thickness of human knee joints by computer analysis of three-dimensional magnetic resonance images. Invest Radiol 33 (1998) 289-299
9. Stammberger T., Eckstein F., Michaelis M., Englmeier K.H., and Reiser M. Interobserver reproducibility of quantitative cartilage measurements: comparison of B-spline snakes and manual segmentation. Magn Reson Imaging 17 (1999) 1033-1042
10. Lynch J.A., Zaim S., Zhao J., Stork A., Peterfy C., and Genant H.K. Cartilage segmentation of 3D MRO scans of the osteoarthritic knee combining user knowledge and active contours. Proc SPIE 3979 (2000) 925-935
11. Cicuttini F., Forbes A., Asbeutah A., Morris K., and Stuckey S. Comparison and reproducibility of fast and conventional spoiled gradient-echo magnetic resonance sequences in the determination of knee cartilage volume. J Orthop Res 18 (2000) 580-584
12. Steines D., Cheng C., Wong J., Tsai S., Napel P., and Lang P. Segmentation of osteoarthritic femoral cartilage using live wire. Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 8 (2000) 220
13. McWalter E.J., Wirth W., Siebert M., von Eisenhart-Rothe R.M., Hudelmaier M., Wilson D.R., et al. Use of novel interactive input devices for segmentation of articular cartilage from magnetic resonance images. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 13 (2005) 48-53
14. Tamez-Pena J., Barbu-McInnis M., and Totterman S. Unsupervised definition of the tibia-femoral joint regions of the human knee and its applications to cartilage analysis. Proc SPIE 6144 (2006) 1465-1475
15. Raynauld J.P., Martel-Pelletier J., Berthiaume M.J., Beaudoin G., Choquette D., Haraoui B., et al. Long term evaluation of disease progression through the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis patients: correlation with clinical symptoms and radiographic changes. Arthritis Res Ther 8 (2006) R21
16. Eckstein F., Hudelmaier M., Wirth W., Kiefer B., Jackson R., Yu J., et al. Double echo steady state magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage at 3 Tesla: a pilot study for the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Ann Rheum Dis 65 (2006) 433-441
17. Osteoarthritis Initiative. http://www.niams.nih.gov/ne/oi/index.htm (checked 5/2006) 2006.
18. Visser M., Newman A.B., Nevitt M.C., Kritchevsky S.B., Stamm E.B., Goodpaster B.H., et al. Reexamining the sarcopenia hypothesis. Muscle mass versus muscle strength. Health, Aging, and Body Composition Study Research Group. Ann N Y Acad Sci 904 (2000) 456-461
19. Multicenter Osteoarthritis Study. http://researchresources.bumc.bu.edu/abstract/5u01ag018820-05.htm (checked 5/2006) 2006.
20. Schneider E. Pilot study analyses: results and perspectives. Presented at the 10th World Congress of the Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OARSI), Boston, MA, 2005.