Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 1056-1061

  Pollak, Naomi ^a,b   Rheault, Wendy ^a   Stoecker, Judith L ^a  

^a ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICINE AND SCIENCE   (United States)

^b Presbyterian Homes ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COGNITION; COMMUNITY CARE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; RETIREMENT; SELF CARE;

EID: 0029846126     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90068-4     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Spencer G. Projections of the population of the United States by age, sex and race: 1988 to 2080. Current Population Reports. Washington (DC): US Bureau of the Census; 1989; 1018:Series P-25.
2. Long-term care for the functionally dependent elderly. Vital & Health Statistics. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1990; DHHS Publication No. 90-1765.Series 13.
3. Guccione AA. Functional assessment of the elderly. In: Guccione AA, editor. Geriatric physical therapy. St. Louis (MO): Mosby, 1992:113-23.
4. Jette AM. Physical disablement concepts for physical therapy research. Phys Ther 1994;74:380-6.
5. State University of New York. Guide to the use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation including the Functional Independence Measure. Version 3.1. Buffalo (NY): SUNY, 1990.
6. State University of New York. Guide to the use of the Uniform Data Set for Medical Rehabilitation including the Functional Independence Measure. Version 4.0. Buffalo (NY): SUNY, 1994.
7. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, Zielezny M, Sherwin FS. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Topics Ger Rehabil 1986;3:59-74.
8. Johnston MV, Findley TW, Deluca J, Katz RT. Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation: XII. measurement tools with application to brain injury. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70 Suppl 1: S114-30.
9. Granger CV. Health accounting-functional assessment of the long-term patient. In: Kottke FJ, Lehmann JF, editors. Krusen's handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1990:270-82.
10. Hall KM, Hamilton BB, Gordon WA, Zasler ND. Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices. Disability Rating Scale, Functional Independence Measure and Functional Assessment Measure. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:60-74.
11. Hamilton BB, Granger CV. Disability outcomes following inpatient rehabilitation for stroke. Phys Ther 1994;74:494-503.
12. Granger C, Hamilton B. UDS Report: The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation Report of First Admissions for 1990. Am Phys Med Rehabil 1992;71:108-13.
13. VanSant AF. Life-span development in functional tasks. Phys Ther 1990;70:788-98.
14. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, Hamilton BB, Granger CW. Relationship between impairment and physical disability as measured by the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:566-73.
15. Ottenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV, Tomita M, Hurren D, Charvat B. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1297-1301
16. Hamilton BB, Laughlin JA, Granger CV, Kayton RM. Interrater agreement of the seven Functional Independence Measures [abstract]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:790.
17. Linacre JM, Heinemann AW, Wright BD, Granger CV, Hamilton BB. The structure and stability of the Functional Independence Measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:127-33.
18. Dodds A, Martin D, Stolov W, Deyo R. A validation of the Functional Independence Measure and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:531-6.
19. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC, Hens MM. Functional assessment scales: A study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990:71:870-4.
20. Granger CV, Cotter AC, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC. Functional assessment scales: a study of persons after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:133-8.
21. Disler PB, Roy CW, Smith BP. Predicting hours of care needed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:139-43.
22. Muecke L, Shekar S, Dwyer D, Israel E. Functional screening of lower-limb amputees: a role in predicting rehabilitation outcome? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:851-8.
23. Cook L, Smith DS, Truman G. Using Functional Independence Profiles as an index of outcome in the rehabilitation of brain injured patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:390-3.
24. Oczowski WJ, Barecca S. The Functional Independence Measure: its use to identify rehabilitation needs in stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1291-4.
25. Merbitz C, Morris J, Grip JC. Ordinal scales and foundations of misinference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1989;70:308-12.
26. Wright BD. Turning scores into measures: reasons for Rasch Analysis. Chicago: MESA Press, 1992.
27. Wright BD, Stone MH. Best test design: Rasch Measurement. Chicago: MESA Press, 1979.
28. Rheault W, Coulson E. Use of the Rasch Model in the development of a clinical competence scale. J Phys Ther Edu 1991;5:10-13.
29. McArthur DL, Cohen MJ, Schandler SL. Rasch Analysis of functional assessment scales: an example using pain behaviors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:296-304.
30. Fischer AG. The assessment of IADL motor skills: an application of many-faceted Rasch analysis. Am J Occup Ther 1993;47:319-29.
31. Haley SM, Coster WJ, Binda-Sundberg K. Measuring physical disablement: the contextual challenge. Phys Ther 1994;47:443-51.
32. SM). Buffalo, NY, 1989. 1 videocassette: 36 minutes, sound, color. Available from: The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 232 Parker Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214.
33. SM). Buffalo, NY: 1989. 1 videocassette: 36 minutes, sound, color. Available from: The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation, State University of New York at Buffalo, 232 Parker Hall, 3435 Main Street, Buffalo, NY 14214.
34. Wright BD, Linacre JM. BIGSTEPS: Rasch analysis for all two-facet models (Computer program), Version 2.03. Chicago: MESA Press, 1991. 1 computer disk: 3 1/2 in. Accompanied by: 1 user's guide. System requirements: IBM PC family or fully compatible computer, DOS 2.0 or higher, runs in 250 K. Math coprocessor strongly recommended but not required. Analyzes 20,000 persons, 3,000 items.
35. Velozo C, Magalhaes L, Pan A, Weeks DK. Measurement Qualities of the Level of Rehabilitation Scale III (LORS-III) [abstract]. Arch Phys Med Rehab 1993;74:661.
36. Rabbit P. Memory. In: Oxford textbook of geriatric medicine. Evams JG, Williams TF, editors. London: Oxford University Press, 1992:18.
37. Friedman PJ, Richmond DE, Everett JJ. A prospective trial of serial gait speed as a measure of rehabilitation in the elderly. Age Ageing 1989;17:227-35.
38. Kanten DN, Mulrow CD, Gerety MB, Lichtenstein MJ. Falls: an examination of three reporting methods in nursing homes. J Am Geriatr Soc 1993;41:662-6.
39. Rueben DB, Siu AL, Kimpau S. The predictive validity of self-report and performance-based measures of function and health. J Gerontol Med Sci 1992;47:M106-110.