Microscopic cooperative vehicular traffic flow modelling: Analytical considerations and calibration issues based NGSIM data

19th Intelligent Transport Systems World Congress, ITS 2012

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Monteil, J ^a,c,d   Nantes, A ^b   Billot, R ^a,b,c,d   El Faouzi, N E ^a,b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

^b QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITÉ GUSTAVE EIFFEL   (France)

^d UNIVERSITÉ DE LYON   (France)

Author keywords

Aggressive lane changing behavior; C2X; Communication systems; Cooperative car following model; Traffic flow stability; Traffic model

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; HIGHWAY TRAFFIC CONTROL; RADIO BROADCASTING; STABILITY; STREET TRAFFIC CONTROL; TRAFFIC CONGESTION;

C2X; CAR FOLLOWING MODELS; LANE-CHANGING BEHAVIORS; TRAFFIC FLOW STABILITY; TRAFFIC MODEL;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84896944318     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Car 2 Car communication consortium (2007). CAR 2 CAR Communication Consortium Manifesto-Overview of the C2C-CC System.
2. Ngoduy, D., Hoogendoorn, S.P. and Liu, R. (2009). Continuum modeling of cooperative traffic flow dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388(13), pp. 2705-2716.
3. Ge, H. X., Dai, S. Q., Xue, Y and Dong., L. Y. (2005). Stabilization analysis and modified korteweg-de vries equation in a cooperative driving system. Phys. Rev. E, 71(6):066119.
4. Nagatani, T. (1998). Thermodynamic theory for the jamming transition in traffic flows. Physical Review E (Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics), Volume 58, Issue 4, pp. 4271-4276
5. Monteil, J., Billot, R., Rey, D., and El Faouzi, N.-E. (2012). Distributed and centralized approaches for cooperative traffic dynamics., in Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, Volume 48, pp. 3198-3208
6. Bando, M., Hasebe, K., Nakayama, A., Shibata, A. Sugiyama., Y. (1995). Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. Phys. Rev. E, 51(2), pp. 1035-1042.
7. Kesting, A., Treiber, M. and Helbing, D. (2007). General Lane-Changing Model MOBIL for Car-Following Model, Transportation Research Record, 1999, pp. 86-94.
8. Laval, J., Cassidy, M., and Daganzo, C. (2005). Impacts of lane changes at merge bottlenecks: a theory and strategies to maximize capacity?, in Proceedings of Traffic and Granular Flow conference, pp. 577-586.
9. Kesting, A. and Treiber, M. (2008). Calibrating car-following models by using trajectories data, in Transportation Research Record, pp. 148-156.
10. Punzo, V., Borzacchiello, M. T. and Ciuffo, B. (2011). On the assessment of vehicle trajectory data accuracy and application to the NGSIM program data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, pp. 1243-1262.
11. Wenhui, F., Jianming H., and Qi, W. (2010). Travel time estimation based on intelligent vehicle infrastructure cooperation. 6th Advanced Forum on Transportation, Beijing.
12. Bevrani, K. and Chung, E. (2011). Car Following Model Improvement for Traffic Safety Metrics Reproduction. In Proceedings of the Australasian Transport Research Forum, 2011.
13. Thiemann, C., Treiber, M. Kesting, A. (2008). Estimating acceleration and lane-changing dynamics from next generation simulation trajectory data. Transportation Research Record, pp. 90-101.
14. Toledo, T., Koutsopoulos, H. N., and Ben-Akiva, M. E. (2003). Modeling Integrated Lane-changing Behavior, Transportation Research Record 1831, pp. 65-75.
15. Kesting, A., and Treiber, M. (2009). Modeling lane changing Decisions with MOBIL, in Traffic and Granular Flow '07, pp. 211-221.