Comparing tailored and untailored text messages for smoking cessation: A randomized controlled trial among adolescent and young adult smokers

Health Education Research

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 195-205

  Skov Ettrup, L S ^a   Ringgaard, L W ^b   Dalum, P ^b   Flensborg Madsen, T ^a   Thygesen, L C ^a   Tolstrup, J S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b DANISH CANCER SOCIETY RESEARCH CENTER   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SELF CONCEPT; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TEXT MESSAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; SELF EFFICACY; SMOKING; SMOKING CESSATION; TEXT MESSAGING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84896931214     PISSN: 02681153     EISSN: 14653648     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/her/cyt112     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Free C, Knight R, Robertson S, et al. Smoking cessation support delivered via mobile phone text messaging (txt2stop): A single-blind, randomised trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 49-55
2. Whittaker R, Borland R, Bullen C et al.Mobile phone-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009, CD006611
3. Haug S, Meyer C, Schorr G, et al. Continuous individual support of smoking cessation using text messaging: A pilot experimental study. Nicotine Tob Res 2009; 11: 915-23
4. Krebs P, Prochaska JO, Rossi JS. A meta-Analysis of computer-Tailored interventions for health behavior change. Prev Med 2010; 51: 214-21
5. Lustria ML, Cortese J, Noar SM, et al. Computer-Tailored health interventions delivered over theWeb: Reviewand analysis of key components. Patient Educ Couns 2009; 74: 156-73
6. Hawkins RP, Kreuter M, Resnicow K, et al. Understanding tailoring in communicating about health. Health Educ Res 2008; 23: 454-66
7. Petty RE, Cacioppo JT. The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Exp Soc Psychol 1986; 19: 124-92
8. Symons CS, Johnson BT. The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-Analysis. Psychol Bull 1997; 121: 371-94
9. Dijkstra A. Working mechanisms of computer-Tailored health education: Evidence from smoking cessation. Health Educ Res 2005; 20: 527-39
10. Chua HF, Ho SS, Jasinska AJ, et al. Self-related neural response to tailored smoking-cessation messages predicts quitting. Nat Neurosci 2011; 14: 426-7
11. Harrington NG, Noar SM. Reporting standards for studies of tailored interventions. Health Educ Res 2012; 27: 331-42
12. Whittaker R, McRobbie H, Bullen C, et al. Mobile phonebased interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 11: CD006611
13. Etter JF. Comparing computer-Tailored, internet-based smoking cessation counseling reports with generic, untailored reports: A randomized trial. J Health Commun 2009; 14: 646-57
14. Wangberg SC, Nilsen O, Antypas K, et al. Effect of tailoring in an internet-based intervention for smoking cessation: Randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2011; 13: E121
15. Mason D, Gilbert H, Sutton S. Effectiveness of web-based tailored smoking cessation advice reports (iQuit): A randomised trial. Addiction 2012; 107: 2183-90
16. Bandura A. Health promotion from the perspective of social cognitive theory. Psychol Health 1998; 13: 623-49
17. Sussman S, Sun P. Youth tobacco use cessation: 2008 update. Tob Induc Dis 2009; 5: 3
18. Nielsen PK. Xhale: Smoking cessation for young people using digital media. Res Pract Health Promot 2009; 14: 15-34
19. Monataño DE, Kasprzyk D. The theory of reasoned action and the theory of planned behaviour. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (eds). Heath Behaviour and Health Education. 3rd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2002, 67-98
20. Lawrance L. Validity of a self-efficacy scale to predict adolescent smoking. Heath Educ Res 1989; 4: 351-60
21. De Vries H, Mudde A, Kremers S, et al. The European Smoking Prevention Framework Approach (ESFA): Shortterm effects. Health Educ Res 2003; 18: 649-63
22. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, et al. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ 2009; 338: B2393
23. Norman GJ. Answering the 'What works?' question in health behavior change. Am J Prev Med 2008; 34: 449-50
24. Fergusson D, Aaron SD, Guyatt G, et al. Post-randomisation exclusions: The intention to treat principle and excluding patients from analysis. BMJ 2002; 325: 652-4
25. Wangberg SJ, Bergmo TS, Johnsen JK. Adherence in Internet-based interventions. Patient Pref Adherence 2008; 2: 57-65
26. West R, Hajek P, Stead L, et al. Outcome criteria in smoking cessation trials: Proposal for a common standard. Addiction 2005; 100: 299-303
27. Barnes SA, Larsen MD, Schroeder D, et al. Missing data assumptions and methods in a smoking cessation study. Addiction 2010; 105: 431-7
28. Hansen WB, Malotte CK, Fielding JE. The bogus pipeline revisited-The use of the threat of detection as a means of increasing self-reports of tobacco use. J Appl Psychol 1985; 70: 789-92
29. Vuckovic N, Polen MR, Hollis JF. The problem is getting us to stop-what teens say about smoking cessation. Prev Med 2003; 37: 209-18
30. DijkstraA,BallastK. Personalization and perceived personal relevance in computer-Tailored persuasion in smoking cessation. Br J Health Psychol 2011; 17: 60-73