Carbon dioxide emission, institutional quality, and economic growth: Empirical evidence in Malaysia

Renewable Energy

Volumn 68, Issue , 2014, Pages 276-281

  Lau, Lin Sea ^a   Choong, Chee Keong ^a   Eng, Yoke Kee ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TUNKU ABDUL RAHMAN   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Bounds test; Carbon dioxide emission; Economic growth; Granger causality test; Institutional quality

Indexed keywords

BOUNDS TEST; CARBON DIOXIDE EMISSIONS; ECONOMIC GROWTHS; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INSTITUTIONAL QUALITIES;

CARBON DIOXIDE; GLOBAL WARMING; INTERNATIONAL TRADE; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; STATISTICAL TESTS; CARBON; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ECONOMICS;

ECONOMICS; CARBON DIOXIDE;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; ECONOMIC GROWTH; EMISSION CONTROL; EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS; POLICY MAKING; ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK; TEMPORAL ANALYSIS;

MALAYSIA;

EID: 84896894516     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2014.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. World Bank. Growth and CO2 emissions: how do different countries fare. Retrieved February 10, 2010, from http://http:siteresources.worldbank.org.
2. Soytas U., Sari R. Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: challenges faced by an UN candidate member. Ecol Econ 2009, 68:1667-1675.
3. Energy Information Administration International Energy annual 2002 2004.
4. Dijkgraaf E., Vollebergh H.R.J. Growth and/or environment: is there a Kuznets curve for carbon emissions? 1998, Paper presented at the 2nd biennial meeting of the European Society for Ecological Economics, Geneva.
5. Schmalensee R., Stoker T.M., Judson R.A. World carbon dioxide emissions: 1950-2050. Rev Econ Stat 1998, 80:15-27.
6. 2 emissions 1900-2010: an exploratory note. Energ Policy 2005, 33:1223-1230.
7. 2. Econ Lett 2004, 82:121-126.
8. 2 emissions: a robustness exercise. Ecol Econ 2005, 57:152-163.
9. Dinda S., Coondoo D. Income and emissions: a panel based cointegration analysis. Ecol Econ 2006, 57:167-181.
10. 2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energ Policy 2009, 37:5167-5172.
11. Lamla M.J. Long-run determinants of pollution: a robustness analysis. Ecol Econ 2009, 69:135-144.
12. 2 emissions, energy consumption, and economic growth in Brazil. Energ 2011, 36:2450-2458.
13. Han X.M., Zhang M.L., Liu S. Research on the relationship of economic growth and environmental pollution in Shandong province based on environmental Kuznets curve. Energ Procedia 2011, 5:508-512.
14. Panayotou T. Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development 1993, Technology and Employment Programme, Geneva.
15. Fodha M., Zaghdoud O. Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental kuznets curve. Energ Policy 2009, 38(2):1150-1156.
16. 2 in Canada. Ecol Econ 2010, 69:1083-1093.
17. Focacci A. Empirical analysis of the environmental and energy policies in some developing countries using widely employed macroeconomic indicators: the cases of Brazil, China and India. Energ Policy 2005, 33:543-554.
18. Hu C.Z., Huang X.J. Characteristics of carbon emission in China and analysis on its cause. China Popu Res Env 2008, 18(3):38-42.
19. Pearson P.J. Energy, externalities and environmental quality: will development cure the ills it creates?. Energ Stud Rev 1994, 6(3):199-216.
20. Stern D.I., Common M.S., Barbier E.B. Economic growth and environmental degradation: the environmental Kuznets curve and sustainable development. World Dev 1996, 24(7):1151-1160.
21. Dinda S. Climate change and human insecurity. Int J Glob Environ 2009, 1-2(9):103-109.
22. Porter M.E., van der Linde C. Towards a new conception of the environmental-competitiveness relationship. JEcon Perspect 1995, 9:97-118.
23. Hung C.M., Shaw D. The impact of upstream catch and global warming on the grey mullet fishery in Taiwan: a non-cooperative game analysis. Mar Resour Econ 2006, 21(3):285-300.
24. North D. Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
25. Panayotou T. Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Env Dev Econ 1997, 2(4):465-484.
26. Gagliardi F. Institutions and economic change: a critical survey of the new institutional approaches and empirical evidence. JSocio Econ 2008, 37:416-443.
27. Aron J. Growth and institutions: a review of the evidence. World Bank Res Obser 2000, 15(1):99-135.
28. Subramanian A. The evolution of institutions in India and its relationship with economic growth. Oxf Rev Econ Pol 2007, 23(2):196-220.
29. Lee K., Kim B.Y. Both institutions and policies matter but differently for different income groups of countries: determinants of long-run economic growth revisited. World Dev 2009, 37(3):533-549.
30. World Bank World development indicators 2012, The World Bank, Washington D.C.
31. Williams A., Siddique A. The use (and abuse) of governance indicators in economics: a review. Econ Gov 2008, 9:131-175.
32. Barro R. Determinants of economic growth: a cross-country empirical study 1996, NBER working papers 5698.
33. Rigobon R., Rodrik D. Rule of law, democracy, openness and income: estimating the interrelationships 2004, Centre for Economic Policy, Discussion Paper No.4653.
34. Bhattacharyya S. Unbundled institutions, human capital and growth. JComp Econ 2009, 37:106-120.
35. Brunetti A., Weder B. Political sources of growth: a critical note on measurement. Public Choice 1995, 82(1-2):125-134.
36. Chong A., Calderon C. Causality and feedback between institutional measures and economic growth. Econ Pol 2000, 12(1):69-81.
37. Alesina A., Dollar D. Who gives foreign aid to whom and why?. JEcon Growth 2000, 5:33-63.
38. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. JAppl Econ 2001, 16:289-326.
39. Engle R.F., Granger C.W.J. Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation, testing. Econometrica 1987, 55:251-276.
40. Johansen S. Statistical analysis of cointegration vectors. JEcon Dyn Control 1988, 12:231-254.
41. Johansen S., Juselius K. Maximum likelihood estimation and inference on cointegration with applications to demand for money. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 1990, 52:169-210.
42. Narayan P.K., Narayan S. Estimating income and price elasticities of imports for Fiji in a cointegration framework. Econ Model 2005, 22:423-438.
43. Narayan P.K. The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Appl Econ 2005, 37:1979-1990.
44. Perron P. Further evidence on breaking trend functions in macroeconomic variables. JEcon 1997, 80:355-385.
45. Narayan P.K., Smyth R. are shocks to energy consumption permanent or temporary? Evidence from 182 countries. Energ Policy 2007, 35:333-341.
46. Narayan P.K., Narayan S., Popp S. Energy consumption at the state level: the unit root null hypothesis from Australia. Appl Energ 2010, 6:1953-1962.
47. Apergis N., Payne J.E. Structural breaks and petroleum consumption in US states: are shocks transitory or permanent?. Energ Policy 2010, 38:6375-6378.
48. Narayan P.K., Liu R. Are shocks to commodity prices persistent?. Appl Energ 2011, 88:409-416.
49. Narayan P.K., Narayan S., Smyth R. Energy consumption at business cycle horizons: the case of the United States. Energ Econ 2011, 33:161-167.
50. Shahbaz M., Tiwari A.K., Ozturk I., Farooq A. Are fluctuations in electricity consumption per capita transitory? Evidence from developed and developing economies. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2013, 28:551-554.
51. Mulder M., Scholtens B. The impact of renewable energy on electricity prices in the Netherlands. Renew Energ 2013, 57:94-100.
52. Mumtaz R., Zaman K., Sajjad F., Lodhi M.S., Irfan M., Khan I., Naseem I. Modeling the causal relationship between energy and growth factors: journey towards sustainable development. Renew Energ 2014, 63:353-365.
53. Hall R., Jones C. Why do some countries produce so much more output per worker than others?. QJ Econ 1999, 114:83-116.
54. Demetriades P., Law S.H. Finance, institutions and economic development. Int J Finance Econ 2006, 11:245-260.