Are shocks to energy consumption permanent or temporary? Evidence from 182 countries

Energy Policy

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 333-341

  Kumar Narayan, Paresh ^a   Smyth, Russell ^b  

^a GRIFFITH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Energy consumption; Panel data; Unit roots

Indexed keywords

ECONOMICS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ENERGY POLICY;

PANEL DATA; STATIONARITY PROPERTIES; UNIT ROOTS;

ENERGY UTILIZATION;

ENERGY USE; PANEL DATA;

EID: 33750187104     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.027     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Agnolucci, P., Barker, T., Ekins, P., 2004. Hysteresis and energy demand: the announcement effects and the effects of the UK climate change levy. Applied Environmental Economics Conference, March, The Royal Society, UK.
2. Altinay G., and Karagol E. Structural break, unit root and the causality between energy consumption and GDP in Turkey. Energy Economics 26 (2004) 985-994
3. Ball, L., 1993. The dynamics of high inflation, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 4578.
4. Baltagi B., and Kao C. Nonstationary panels, cointegration in panels and dynamic panels: a survey. Advances in Econometrics 15 (2000) 7-51
5. Beenstock M., Golin E., and Nabot D. The demand for electricity in Israel. Energy Economics 21 (1999) 168-183
6. Ben-David D., and Papell D. The great wars, the great crash and steady state growth: some new evidence about an old stylized fact. Journal of Monetary Economics 36 (1995) 453-475
7. Ben-David D., Lumsdaine R., and Papell D.H. Unit Roots, postwar slowdowns and long-run growth: evidence from two Structural Breaks. Empirical Economics 28 (2003) 303-319
8. Caruth A.A., Hooker M.A., and Oswald A.J. Unemployment equilibria and input prices: theory and evidence from the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics 80 (1998) 621-628
9. Chaudhuri K., and Wu Y. Random walk versus breaking trend in stock prices: evidence from emerging markets. Journal of Banking and Finance 27 (2003) 575-592
10. Cochrane J.H. Permanent ant transitory components of GNP and stock prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (1994) 241-266
11. Cunado J., and Perez de Gracia F. Do oil price shocks matter? Evidence for some European countries. Energy Economics 25 (2003) 137-154
12. DeJong D.N., Nankervis J.C., Savin N.E., and Whiteman C.H. The power problems of unit root tests in time series with autoregressive errors. Journal of Econometrics 53 (1992) 323-343
13. Dickey D.A., and Fuller W.A. Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74 (1979) 427-431
14. Doldado J., Jenkins J., and Sosvilla-Rivero S. Cointegration and unit roots. Journal of Economic Surveys 4 (1990) 249-273
15. Dornbusch R. Expectation and exchange rate dynamics. Journal of Political Economy (1976) 1161-1176
16. Engsted T., and Bentzen J. Dynamic modelling of energy demand: a guided tour through the jungle of unit roots and cointegration. OPEC Review (1997) 261-293
17. Glasure Y.U., and Lee A.R. Cointegration, error-correction and the relationship between GDP and energy: the case of South Korea and Singapore. Resource and Energy Economics 20 (1997) 17-25
18. Hall A.D. Testing for a unit root in time series with pretest data based model selection. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 12 (1994) 461-470
19. Hamilton J.D. Oil and the macroeconomy since World War II. Journal of Political Economy 92 (1983) 228-248
20. Hamilton J.D. This is what happened to the oil-macroeconomy relationship. Journal of Monetary Economics 38 (1996) 215-220
21. Hendry D.F., and Juselius K. Explaining cointegration analysis, part 1. Energy Journal 21 (2000) 1-42
22. Hurlin C., and Mignon V. Second generation panel unit root tests (2004), University of Paris X, Mimeo
23. Im K.-S., Lee J., and Tieslau M. Panel LM unit-root tests with level shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 67 (2005) 393-419
24. Im K.-S., Pesaran H., and Shin Y. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115 (2003) 53-74
25. Joyeux, R., Ripple, R.D., 2004. The evaluation of standard of living and the role of household electricity consumption: a panel cointegration analysis. Paper presented to the New Zealand Association of Economists, June 30-July, 2.
26. Karlsson S., and Lothgren M. On the power and interpretation of panel unit root tests. Economic Letters 66 (2000) 249-255
27. Kim L., and Loungani P. The role of energy in real business cycle models. Journal of Monetary Economics 29 (1992) 173-189
28. Lee, C.C., 2005. The causality relationship between energy consumption and GDP in G-11 countries revisited. Energy Policy (in press).
29. Lee J., and Strazicich M.C. Minimum LM unit root test with one structural break (2003), Mimeo Department of Economics, Appalachian State University
30. Lee J., and Strazicich M.C. Minimum Lagrange multiplier unit root test with two structural breaks. Review of Economics and Statistics 85 (2003) 1082-1089
31. Levin A., Lin C.-F., and Chu C.S.J. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108 (2002) 1-24
32. Luintel K. Heterogeneous panel unit root tests and purchasing power parity. Manchester School Supplement (2001) 42-56
33. Lumsdaine R., and Papell D. Multiple trend breaks and the unit root hypothesis. Review of Economics and Statistics 79 (1997) 212-218
34. Maddala G.S., and Wu S. A comparative study of unit roots with panel data and a new simple test. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61 (1999) 631-651
35. MacKinnon J. Critical values for cointegration tests. In: Engle R.F., and Granger C.W. (Eds). Long-run Economic Relationships: Readings in Cointegration (1991), Oxford University Press, Oxford 267-276
36. McAvinchey I.D., and Yannopoulos A. Stationarity, structural change and specification in a demand system: the case of energy. Energy Economics 25 (2003) 65-92
37. Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R., 2005. Structural breaks and unit roots in Australian macroeconomic time series, Pacific Economic Review (in press).
38. Nelson C., and Plosser C. Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series. Journal of Monetary Economics 10 (1982) 139-162
39. Ng S., and Perron P. Unit root tests in ARMA models with data dependent methods for the selection of the truncation lag. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90 (1995) 268-281
40. O'Connell P. The overvaluation of purchasing power parity. Journal of International Economics 44 (1998) 1-19
41. Papapetrou E. Oil price shocks, stock market, economic activity and employment in Greece. Energy Economics 23 (2001) 511-532
42. Perman, R., Stein, D.I., 1999. The environmental Kuznets curve: Implications of non-stationarity. Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies Ecological Economics Program, ANU, Working Paper No. 9901.
43. Perron P. The great crash, the oil price shock and the unit root hypothesis. Econometrica 57 (1989) 1361-1401
44. Roed K. Hysteresis in unemployment. Journal of Economic Surveys 11 (1997) 389-418
45. Sardosky P. Oil price shocks and stock market activity. Energy Economics 21 (1999) 449-469
46. Smyth R. Unemployment hysteresis in Australian states and territories: evidence from panel data unit root tests. Australian Economic Review 36 (2003) 181-192
47. 2 emission levels converging among industrial countries?. Environmental and Resource Economics 24 (2003) 263-271
48. Taylor J. Staggered wage setting in a macro model. American Economic Review 69 (1979) 108-113
49. Taylor M., and Sarno L. The behavior of the real exchange rate during the Bretton Woods period. Journal of International Economics 46 (1998) 281-312
50. Zivot E., and Andrews D. Further evidence of the great crash, the oil-price shock and the unit-root hypothesis. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 10 (1992) 251-270