Literature retrieval based on citation context

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 1, Issue , 2013, Pages 1114-1126

  Liu, Shengbo ^a   Chen, Chaomei ^b   Ding, Kun ^a   Wang, Bo ^a   Xu, Kan ^a  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b Drexel University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITATION CONTEXTS; FULL-TEXT DATABASE; HIGHLY-CITED PAPERS; LITERATURE RETRIEVAL; MODULE-BASED; RELEVANT DOCUMENTS; RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS; TAG CLOUDS;

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

EID: 84896869455     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Anderson, M. H. & Sun, P.Y.T. (2010). What have scholars retrieved from Walsh and Ungson (1991)? A citation context study. Management Learning, 41, 131-145.
2. Boyack, K. W., Small, H. & Klavans, R. (2012). Improving the Accuracy of Cocitation Clustering Using Full Text. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, preprint.
3. Bradshaw, S. (2003). Reference directed indexing: Redeeming relevance for subject search in citation indexes. Proceedings of the 7th European conference on digital libraries (pp.499-510), Trondheim: Springer.
4. Callahan, A., Hockema, S., & Eysenbach, G. (2010). Contextual Cocitation: Augmenting Cocitation Analysis and its Applications. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61, 1130-1143.
5. Elkiss, A., Shen, S., Fader, A., Erkan, G., States, D. & Radev, D. (2008). Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59, 51-62.
6. Eto, M. (2012). Evaluations of context-based co-citation searching. Scientometrics, Preprint, 1-23.
7. Gipp, B. & Beel, J. (2009b). Identifying related documents for research paper recommender by CPA and COA. Proceedings of international conference on education and information technology (pp.636-639), Berkeley: International Association of Engineers.
8. Halvey, M. & Keane, K. (2007). An Assessment of Tag Presentation Techniques. The 16th International World Wide Web Conference. Banff: IW3C2.
9. He, Q., Pei, J. & Kifer,D. (2010). Context-aware Citation Recommendation. The 19th International World Wide Web Conference (pp.421-430). Raleigh: IW3C2.
10. Hunter, L. & Cohen, K. (2006). Biomedical language processing: What' s beyond pubmed? Molecular Cell, 21, 589-594.
11. Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14, 10-25.
12. Liu, S. & Chen, C. (2012). The proximity of co-citation. Scientometrics, 91, 495-511.
13. Mei, Q. & Zhai, C. (2008). Generating impact-based summaries for scientific literature. The Proceedings of ACL'08 (pp.816-824). Columbus: ACL.
14. Mercer, R. E. & Marco, CD. (2004). A design methodology for a biomedical literature indexing tool using the rhetoric of science. The BioLink workshop in conjunction with NAACL/HLT (pp.77-84). Boston: Association for Computational Linguistics.
15. Mohammad, S., Dorr, B., Egan, M., Hassan, A., Muthukrishan, P., Qazvinian, V., Radev, D. & Zajic, D. (2009). Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms. Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp.584-592). Boulder: Association for Computational Linguistics.
16. Nakov, P. I., Schwartz, A.S. & Hearst, M.A. (2004). Citances: Citation sentences for semantic analysis of bioscience text. SIGIR 2004Workshop on Search and Discovery in Bioinformatics. Sheffield: SIGIR.
17. Nanba, H., Kando, N. & Okumura, M. (2000). Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types: Towards automatic review article generation. Proceedings of the American society for information science (pp.117-134). Chicago: ASIS.
18. Nanba, H. & Okumura, M. (1999). Towards multi-paper summarization using reference information. The 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp.926-931). Stockholm: IJCAI.
19. Nanba, H. & Okumura, M. (2005). Automatic detection of survey articles. The Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries. Berlin: IJCAI.
20. O'Connor, J. (1982). Citing statements: Computer recognition and use to improve retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 18, 125-131.
21. O'Connor, J. (1983). Biomedical citing statements: Computer recognition and use to aid full-text retrieval. Information Processing and Management, 19, 361-368.
22. Pao, M. L. (1993). Term and citation retrieval: A field study. Information Processing and Management, 29, 95-112.
23. Ritchie, A. (2008). Citation context analysis for information retrieval. University of Cambridge, New Hall.
24. Siddharthan, A. & Teufel, S. (2007). Whose idea was this, and why does it matter? Attributing scientific work to citations. Proceedings of NAACL/HLT-07. Rochester: Association for Computational Linguistics.
25. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 24, 265-269.
26. Small, H. (1979). Co-citation context analysis: The relationship between bibliometric structure and knowledge. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meeting (pp.270-275), Medford: Information Today.
27. Small, H. (1986). The synthesis of specialty narratives from co-citation clusters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 97-110.
28. Small, H. (2011). Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: a preliminary investgation. Scientometrics, 87, 373-388.