Impact of hydraulic retention time on organic and nutrient removal in a membrane coupled sequencing batch reactor

Water Research

Volumn 55, Issue , 2014, Pages 12-20

  Xu, Shengnan ^a   Wu, Donglei ^b   Hu, Zhiqiang ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b ZHEJIANG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Biological nutrient removal; Hydraulic retention time; Membrane bioreactor; Phosphorus release and uptake; Sequencing batch reactor

Indexed keywords

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS; BACTERIA; BATCH REACTORS; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS; BIOLOGICAL WATER TREATMENT; BIOMASS; EFFICIENCY; EFFLUENTS; NITRIFICATION; NITROGEN REMOVAL; NUTRIENTS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; PHOSPHORUS; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER QUALITY;

BIOLOGICAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL; BIOMASS CONCENTRATIONS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; PHOSPHORUS RELEASE; PHOSPHORUS UPTAKE; RETENTION TIME; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SOLID RETENTION TIME;

BIOREACTORS;

NITROGEN; ORGANIC MATTER; PHOSPHORUS; SEWAGE;

ABUNDANCE; ACTIVATED SLUDGE; BIOMASS; BIOREACTOR; EFFLUENT; HYDROLYSIS; MEMBRANE; NITROGEN; NUTRIENT; ORGANIC MATTER; PHOSPHORUS; RETENTION; WASTEWATER; WATER QUALITY; WATER TREATMENT;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE; AEROBIC METABOLISM; ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ENVIRONMENTAL PARAMETERS; HYDRAULIC RETENTION TIME; HYDROLYSIS; MEMBRANE COUPLED SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; MEMBRANE REACTOR; MICROENVIRONMENT; NITRIFYING BACTERIUM; NITROBACTER; NITROSOMONAS; NITROSPRIA; NONHUMAN; NUTRIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; VOLUMETRY; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER QUALITY; BIOREACTOR; DEVICES; MICROBIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SEWAGE; WATER MANAGEMENT;

BIOREACTORS; PHOSPHORUS; SEWAGE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84896863573     PISSN: 00431354     EISSN: 18792448     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.046     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adam C., Kraume M., Gnirss R., Lesjean B. Membrane bioreactor configurations for enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Water Sci. Technol. Water Supply 2003, 3:237-244.
2. Amann R.I., Binder B.J., Olson R.J., Chisholm S.W., Devereux R., Stahl D.A. Combination of 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes with flow cytometry for analyzing mixed microbial populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1990, 56(6):1919-1925.
3. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, American Public Health Association, Washington, DC. twentieth ed. APHA (Ed.).
4. Bhatta C.P., Matsuda A., Kawasaki K., Omori D. Minimization of sludge production and stable operational condition of a submerged membrane activated sludge process. Water Sci. Technol. 2004, 50:121-128.
5. Bossier P., Verstraete W. Triggers for microbial aggregation in activated sludge?. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1996, 45(1-2):1-6.
6. Charcosset C. Membrane processes in biotechnology: an overview. Biotechnol. Adv. 2006, 24(5):482-492.
7. Coats E.R., Watkins D.L., Brinkman C.K., Loge F.J. Effect of anaerobic HRT on biological phosphorus removal and the enrichment of phosphorus accumulating organisms. Water Environ. Res. 2011, 83(5):461-469.
8. Contreras E.M., Bertola N.C., Giannuzzi L., Zaritzky N.E. A modified method to determine biomass concentration as COD in pure cultures and in activated sludge systems. Water SA 2002, 28(4):463-467.
9. De-Bashan L.E., Bashan Y. Recent advances in removing phosphorus from wastewater and its future use as fertilizer (1997-2003). Water Res. 2004, 38(19):4222-4246.
10. Dubber D., Gray N.F. The effect of anoxia and anaerobia on ciliate community in biological nutrient removal systems using laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactors (SBRs). Water Res. 2011, 45(6):2213-2226.
11. Ersu C.B., Ong S.K., Arslankaya E., Lee Y.W. Impact of solids residence time on biological nutrient removal performance of membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2010, 44(10):3192-3202.
12. Fakhru'l-Razi A., Pendashteh A., Abidin Z.Z., Abdullah L.C., Biak D.R.A., Madaeni S.S. Application of membrane-coupled sequencing batch reactor for oilfield produced water recycle and beneficial re-use. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(18):6942-6949.
13. Fleischer E.J., Broderick T.A., Daigger G.T., Fonseca A.D., Holbrook R.D., Murthy S.N. Evaluation of membrane bioreactor process capabilities to meet stringent effluent nutrient discharge requirements. Water Environ. Res. 2005, 77(2):162-178.
14. Galil N.I., Jacob L. Comparative characterization of biosolids from a membrane bioreactor and from a sequencing batch reactor. Environ. Eng. Sci. 2009, 26(5):1001-1008.
15. Grady C.P.L., Daigger G.T., Love N.G., Filipe C. Biological Wastewater Treatment 2011, CRC Press, New York. third ed.
16. Holakoo L., Nakhla G., Bassi A.S., Yanful E.K. Long term performance of MBR for biological nitrogen removal from synthetic municipal wastewater. Chemosphere 2007, 66(5):849-857.
17. Huang X., Gui P., Qian Y. Effect of sludge retention time on microbial behaviour in a submerged membrane bioreactor. Process Biochem. 2001, 36(10):1001-1006.
18. Huang X., Xiao K., Shen Y. Recent advances in membrane bioreactor technology for wastewater treatment in China. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. China 2010, 4(3):245-271.
19. Iversen V., Koseoglu H., Yigit N.O., Drews A., Kitis M., Lesjean B., Kraume M. Impacts of membrane flux enhancers on activated sludge respiration and nutrient removal in MBRs. Water Res. 2009, 43(3):822-830.
20. Juang Y.C., Adav S.S., Lee D.J., Lai J.Y. Influence of internal biofilm growth on residual permeability loss in aerobic granular membrane bioreactors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 44(4):1267-1273.
21. Kaewsuk J., Thorasampan W., Thanuttamavong M., Seo G.T. Kinetic development and evaluation of membrane sequencing batch reactor (MSBR) with mixed cultures photosynthetic bacteria for dairy wastewater treatment. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91(5):1161-1168.
22. Kang I.J., Lee C.H., Kim K.J. Characteristics of microfiltration membranes in a membrane coupled sequencing batch reactor system. Water Res. 2003, 37(5):1192-1197.
23. Lee D.S., Jeon C.O., Park J.M. Biological nitrogen removal with enhanced phosphate uptake in a sequencing batch reactor using single sludge system. Water Res. 2001, 35(16):3968-3976.
24. Liang Z., Das A., Beerman D., Hu Z. Biomass characteristics of two types of submerged membrane bioreactors for nitrogen removal from wastewater. Water Res. 2010, 44(11):3313-3320.
25. Liang Z., Hu Z. Start-up performance evaluation of submerged membrane bioreactors using conventional activated sludge process and modified Luzack-Ettinger process. J. Environ. Eng. 2012, 138(9):932-939. (United States).
26. Liu G., Xu X., Zhu L., Xing S., Chen J. Biological nutrient removal in a continuous anaerobic-aerobic-anoxic process treating synthetic domestic wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 225:223-229.
27. Liu Y., Yang S.F., Tay J.H., Liu Q.S., Qin L., Li Y. Cell hydrophobicity is a triggering force of biogranulation. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 2004, 34(5):371-379.
28. Münch E.v., Pollard P.C. Measuring bacterial biomass-COD in wastewater containing particulate matter. Water Res. 1997, 31(10):2550-2556.
29. McCarty G.W., Bremner J.M. Availability of organic carbon for denitrification of nitrate in subsoils. Biol. Fertil. Soil. 1992, 14(3):219-222.
30. Metcalf, Eddy Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Reuse 2003, McGraw-Hill Higher Education, New York. fourth ed.
31. Mobarry B.K., Wagner M., Urbain V., Rittmann B.E., Stahl D.A. Phylogenetic probes for analyzing abundance and spatial organization of nitrifying bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1996, 62(6):2156-2162.
32. Monclús H., Sipma J., Ferrero G., Rodriguez-Roda I., Comas J. Biological nutrient removal in an MBR treating municipal wastewater with special focus on biological phosphorus removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101(11):3984-3991.
33. Moreno-Andrade I., Buitrón G. Comparison of the performance of membrane and conventional sequencing batch reactors degrading 4-chlorophenol. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2012, 223(5):2083-2091.
34. Mutamim N.S.A., Noor Z.Z., Hassan M.A.A., Olsson G. Application of membrane bioreactor technology in treating high strength industrial wastewater: a performance review. Desalination 2012, 305:1-11.
35. Ni B.J., Yu H.Q., Sun Y.J. Modeling simultaneous autotrophic and heterotrophic growth in aerobic granules. Water Res. 2008, 42(6-7):1583-1594.
36. Qi R., Yu T., Li Z., Li D., Mino T., Shoji T., Fujie K., Yang M. Comparison of conventional and inverted A2/O processes: phosphorus release and uptake behaviors. J. Environ. Sci. 2012, 24(4):571-578.
37. Regan J.M., Harrington G.W., Noguera D.R. Ammonia- and nitrite-oxidizing bacterial communities in a pilot-scale chloraminated drinking water distribution system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2002, 68(1):73-81.
38. Rosenberger S., Laabs C., Lesjean B., Gnirss R., Amy G., Jekel M., Schrotter J.C. Impact of colloidal and soluble organic material on membrane performance in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Res. 2006, 40(4):710-720.
39. Scheumann R., Kraume M. Influence of hydraulic retention time on the operation of a submerged membrane sequencing batch reactor (SM-SBR) for the treatment of greywater. Desalination 2009, 246(1-3):444-451.
40. Serrano D., Suárez S., Lema J.M., Omil F. Removal of persistent pharmaceutical micropollutants from sewage by addition of PAC in a sequential membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2011, 45(16):5323-5333.
41. Shannon M.A., Bohn P.W., Elimelech M., Georgiadis J.G., Marĩas B.J., Mayes A.M. Science and technology for water purification in the coming decades. Nature 2008, 452(7185):301-310.
42. Siripong S., Rittmann B.E. Diversity study of nitrifying bacteria in full-scale municipal wastewater treatment plants. Water Res. 2007, 41(5):1110-1120.
43. Tay J.H., Luhai Zeng J., Sun D.D. Effects of hydraulic retention time on system performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2003, 38(4):851-868.
44. Tu X., Zhang S., Xu L., Zhang M., Zhu J. Performance and fouling characteristics in a membrane sequence batch reactor (MSBR) system coupled with aerobic granular sludge. Desalination 2010, 261(1-2):191-196.
45. Valentino F., Brusca A.A., Beccari M., Nuzzo A., Zanaroli G., Majone M. Start up of biological sequencing batch reactor (SBR) and short-term biomass acclimation for polyhydroxyalkanoates production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88(2):261-270.
46. Vargas A., Moreno-Andrade I., Buitrón G. Controlled backwashing in a membrane sequencing batch reactor used for toxic wastewater treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 2008, 320(1-2):185-190.
47. Wachtmeister A., Kuba T., Van Loosdrecht M.C.M., Heijnen J.J. A sludge characterization assay for aerobic and denitrifying phosphorus removing sludge. Water Res. 1997, 31(3):471-478.
48. Wagner M., Rath G., Amann R., Koops H.P., Schleifer K.H. In situ identification of ammonia-oxidizing bacteria. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 1995, 18(2):251-264.
49. Wang Y., Guo G., Wang H., Stephenson T., Guo J., Ye L. Long-term impact of anaerobic reaction time on the performance and granular characteristics of granular denitrifying biological phosphorus removal systems. Water Res. 2013, 47(14):5326-5337.
50. Watanabe K., Miyashita M., Harayama S. Starvation improves survival of bacteria introduced into activated sludge. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2000, 66(9):3905-3910.
51. Wu Q., Bishop P.L., Keener T.C. Biological phosphate uptake and release: effect of pH and magnesium ions. Water Environ. Res. 2006, 78(2):196-201.
52. Yoon S.H., Kim H.S., Yeom I.T. The optimum operational condition of membrane bioreactor (MBR): cost estimation of aeration and sludge treatment. Water Res. 2004, 38(1):37-46.
53. Zumft W.G. Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification?. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 1997, 61(4):533-616.