Comparison of the performance of membrane and conventional sequencing batch reactors degrading 4-chlorophenol

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

Volumn 223, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 2083-2091

  Moreno Andrade, Iván ^a   Buitrón, Germán ^a  

^a CENTRO DE FÍSICA APLICADA Y TECNOLOGÍA AVANZADA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

4 Chlorophenol; Effluent characteristics; Foaming; Sequencing batch reactor; Submerged membrane

Indexed keywords

4-CHLOROPHENOL; 4-CP DEGRADATION; DEGRADATION EFFICIENCY; MICROBIAL COMMUNITIES; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PARAMETERS; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; PROTEIN CONCENTRATIONS; PROTEIN CONTENTS; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTORS; SETTLING VELOCITY; SIMILARITY ANALYSIS; SLUDGE VOLUMETRIC INDEX; SOLE SOURCE OF CARBON; SUBMERGED MEMBRANE; SUSPENDED SOLIDS; SYNTHETIC WASTE WATER; TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS;

BIOMASS; DEGRADATION; EFFLUENTS; RUNWAY FOAMING;

ACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS;

4 CHLOROPHENOL;

BIOMASS; CHLOROPHENOL; DEGRADATION; EFFLUENT; MEMBRANE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTY; PROTEIN; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; BATCH REACTOR; BIOMASS; BIOREMEDIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EFFLUENT; FOAMING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY; PROTEIN CONTENT; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SLUDGE; SLUDGE SETTLING; SUBMERGED MEMBRANE SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SUSPENDED PARTICULATE MATTER; WASTE WATER;

EID: 84862187062     PISSN: 00496979     EISSN: 15732932     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-011-1006-3     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. APHA, AWWA, & WEF. (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.). Baltimore: Port City Press.
2. Arrojo, B., Mosquera-Corra, A., Garrido, J. M., Méndez, R., Ficara, E., & Malpei, F. (2005). A membrane coupled to a sequencing batch reactor for water reuse and removal of coliform bacteria. Desalination, 179, 109-116.
3. Bae, T. Y., Han, S.-S., & Tak, T. M. (2003). Membrane sequencing batch reactor system for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater. Process Biochemistry, 39, 221-231.
4. Beun, J. J., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Heijnen, J. J. (2002). Aerobic granulation in a sequencing batch airlift reactor. Water Research, 36, 702-712.
5. Carucci, A., Milia, S., Cappai, G., & Muntoni, A. (2010). A direct comparison amongst different technologies (aerobic granular sludge, SBR and MBR) for the treatment of wastewater contaminated by 4-chlorophenol. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 177, 1119-1125.
6. Chen, J., Rulkens, W. H., & Bruning, H. (1997). Photochemical elimination of phenols and COD in industrial wastewaters. Water Science and Technology, 35, 231-238.
7. Cicek, N., Macomber, J., Davel, J., Suidan, M. T., Audic, J., & Genestet, P. (2001). Effect of solids retention time on the performance and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor. Water Science and Technology, 43(11), 43-50.
8. Coello Oviedo, M. D., López-Ramírez, J. A., Sales, D., & Quiroga, J. M. (2003). Evolution of an activated sludge system under starvation conditions. Journal of Chemical Engineering, 94, 139-146.
9. de Kreuk, M. K., & van Loosdrecht, M. C. M. (2004). Selection of slow growing organisms as a means for improving aerobic granular sludge stability. Water Science and Technology, 49(11-12), 9-17.
10. Delbés, C., Moletta, R., & Godon, J. J. (2000). Monitoring of activity dynamics o fan anaerobic digester bacterial community using 16S rRNA polymerase chain-singlestrand conformation polymorphism analysis. Environmental Microbiology, 2, 506-515.
11. Di Bella, C., Torregrossa, M., & Viviani, G. (2011). The role of EPS concentration in MBR foaming: analysis of a submerged pilot plant. Bioresource Technology, 102, 1628-1635.
12. Etchebere, C., Errazquin, M. I., Dabert, P.,Moletta, R., & Mixí, L. (2001). Evaluation of the denitrifying microbiota of anoxic reactors. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 35, 259-267.
13. Fan, F., Zhou, H., & Husain, H. (2006). Identification of wastewater sludge characteristics to predict critical flux for membrane bioreactor processes. Water Research, 40, 205-212.
14. Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. A. T., & Ryan, P. D. (2001). PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica, 4(1), 1-9. art. 4.
15. Holbrook, R. D., Massie, K. A., & Novak, J. T. (2005). A comparison of membrane bioreactor and conventionalactivated- sludge mixed liquor and biosolids characteristics. Water Environmental Research, 77, 323-330.
16. Judd, S. (2006). The MBR book. Principles and applications of membrane bioreactors in water and wastewaters treatment. Oxford: Elsevier.
17. Kang, I.-J., Lee, C.-K., & Kim, K.-J. (2003). Characteristics of microfiltration membranes in a membrane coupled sequencing batch reactor system. Water Research, 37, 1192-1197.
18. Le-Clech, P., Chen, V., & Fane, A. G. (2006). Fouling in membrane bioreactors used in wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 284, 17-53.
19. Lesjean, B., Rosenberger, S., Laabs, C., Jekel, M., Gnirss, R., & Amy, G. (2005). Correlation between membrane fouling and soluble/collidal organic substances in membrane bioreactors for municipal wastewater treatment. Water Science and Technology, 51(6/7), 1-8.
20. Li, X., Gao, F., Hua, Z., Du, G., & Chen, J. (2005). Treatment of synthetic wastewater by a novel MBR with granular sludge developed for controlling membrane fouling. Separation and Purification Technology, 46, 19-25.
21. Liang, S., Liu, C., & Song, L. (2007). Soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactor operation: behaviors, characteristics, and fouling potential. Water Research, 41, 95-101.
22. Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L., & Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the folin phenol reagent. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193, 265-275.
23. Mace, S., & Mata-Alvarez, J. (2002). Utilization of SBR technology for wastewater treatment: an overview. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research, 41, 5539-5553.
24. McAdam, E., Judo, S. J., Glidemeister, R., Drews, A., & Kraume, M. (2005). Critical analysis of submerged membrane sequencing batch reactor conditions. Water Research, 39, 4011-4019.
25. McSwain, B. S., Irvine, R. L., & Wilderer, P. A. (2004). The influence of settling time on the formation of aerobic granules. Water Science and Technology, 50(10), 195-202.
26. Molina-Muñoz, M., Poyatos, J. M., Sánchez-Peinado, M., Hontoria, E., González-López, J., & Rodelas, B. (2009). Microbial community structure and dynamics in a pilotscale submerged membrane bioreactor aerobically treating domestic wastewater under real operation conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 407, 3994-4003.
27. Moreno-Andrade, I., & Buitrón, G. (2004). Variation of the microbial activity during the acclimation phase of a SBR system degrading 4-chlorophenol. Water Science and Technology, 50(10), 251-258.
28. Moreno-Andrade, I., Buitrón, G., Betancur, M. J., & Moreno, J. A. (2006a). Control strategy for the optimal degradation of inhibitory wastewater in a discontinuous bioreactor. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 81 (4), 713-720.
29. Moreno-Andrade, I., Lopez-Vidal, Y., & Buitrón, G. (2006b). Effect of the starvation in the activity and viability of Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 10145 acclimated to degrade 4-chlorophenol in a discontinuous reactor. Water Science and Technology, 54(10), 163-168.
30. Muyzer, G., & Ramsing, N. B. (1995). Molecular methods to study the organization of microbial communities. Archives of Microbiology, 32, 1-9.
31. Pritchard, P. H., O'Neill, E. J., Spain, C. M., & Ahearn, D. J. (1987). Physical and biological parameters that determine the fate of p-chlorophenol in laboratory test systems. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 53, 1833-1838.
32. Sapila, P., Keskinen, A.-K., Akerman, M.-L., Fortelius, C., Haahtela, K., & Yrjälä, K. (2008). High aromatic ringcleavage diversity in birch rhizosphere: PAH treatmentspecific changes of I.E.3 group extradiol dioxygenases and 16S rRNA bacterial communities in soil. ISME Journal, 2, 968-981.
33. Scheumann, R., & Kraume, M. (2009). Influence of hydraulic retention time on the operation of a submerged membrane sequencing batch reactor (SM-SBR) for the treatment of greywater. Desalination, 246, 444-445.
34. Shannon, C. R., & Weaver, W. (1963). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
35. Sharma, A., Thakur, I. S., & Dureja, P. (2009). Enrichment, isolation and characterization of pentachlorophenol degrading bacterium Acinetobacter sp. ISTPCP- 3 from effluent discharge site. Biodegradation, 20, 643-650.
36. Tao, G., Kekre, K., Wei, Z., Lee, T. C., Viswanath, B., & Seah, H. (2005). Membrane bioreactors for water reclamation. Water Science and Technology, 51(6-7), 431-440.
37. Thanh, B. X., Spérandio, M., Guigui, C., Aim, R. B., Wan, J., & Visvanathan, C. (2010). Coupling sequencing batch airlift reactor (SBAR) and membrane filtration: influence of nitrate removal on sludge characteristics, effluent quality and filterability. Desalination, 250, 850-854.
38. Tsilogeorgis, J. A., Zouboulis, A., Samaras, P., & Zamboulis, D. (2008). Application of a membrane sequencing batch reactor for landfill leachate treatment. Desalination, 221, 483-493.
39. Vargas, A., Moreno-Andrade, I., & Buitrón, G. (2008). Controlled backwashing in a membrane sequencing batch reactor used for toxic wastewater treatment. Journal of Membrane Science, 320, 185-190.
40. Wilderer, P. A., Irvine, R. L., & Goronszy, M. C. (2001). Sequencing batch reactor technolog Scientific and Technical Report Series No. 10 (p. 100). London: IWA Publishing.