Single-incision Mini-slings Versus Retropubic Tension-free Vaginal Tapes: A Multicenter Clinical Trial

Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 303-310

  Palomba, Stefano ^a   Oppedisano, Rosamaria ^b   Falbo, Angela ^a   Torella, Marco ^c   Maiorana, Antonio ^d   Materazzo, Caterina ^b   Tolino, Achille ^e   Mastrantonio, Pasquale ^f   La Sala, Giovanni B ^a   Alio, Luigi ^d   Colacurci, Nicola ^c   Zullo, Fulvio ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY MAGNA GRAECIA OF CATANZARO   (Italy)

^c SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

^d Infantile Neuropsychiatry   (Italy)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Clinical trial; Incontinence; Mini slings; Single incision; Sling; Surgery

Indexed keywords

TRAMADOL;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER PERFORATION; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRAOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MICTURITION DISORDER; MIDDLE AGED; MIXED INCONTINENCE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SINGLE INCISION MINI SLING; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SUBURETHRAL SLING; TABLET; TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; VOIDING DYSFUNCTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CLINICAL TRIAL; DEVICES; ITALY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; ITALY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84896849840     PISSN: 15534650     EISSN: 15534669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2013.08.714     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Novara G., Artibani W., Barber M.D., et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2010, 58:218-238.
2. Ogah J., Cody D.J., Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodyn 2011, 30:284-291.
3. Ulmsten U., Henriksson L., Johnson P., Varhos G. An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 1996, 7:81-86.
4. Delorme E. Transobturator uretra suspension: mini-invasive procedure in the treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women. Prog Urol 2001, 11:1306-1313.
5. Abdelwahab O., Shedid I., Al-Adl A.M. Tension-free vaginal tape versus secure tension-free vaginal tape in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Curr Urol 2010, 4:93-98.
6. Debodinance P., Deswartes C., Delporte P. Validity of local anesthesia for female stress urinary incontinence surgery with sub-urethral sling. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2008, 37:72-76.
7. Hinoul P., Vervest H.A., den Boon J., et al. A randomized, controlled trial comparing an innovative single incision sling with an established transobturator sling to treat female stress urinary incontinence. J Urol 2011, 185:1356-1362.
8. Tommaselli G.A., Di Carlo C., Gargano V., Formisano C., Scala M., Nappi C. Efficacy and safety of TVT-O and TVT-Secur in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2010, 21:1211-2117.
9. Abdel-Fattah M., Ford J.A., Lim C.P., Madhuvrata P. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol 2011, 60:468-480.
10. Oliveira R., Botelho F., Silva P., et al. Exploratory study assessing efficacy and complications of TVT-O, TVT-Secur, and Mini-Arc: results at 12-month follow-up. Eur Urol 2011, 59:940-944.
11. Barber M.D., Weidner A.C., Sokol A.I., et al. Single-incision mini-sling compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2012, 119:328-337.
12. Sivaslioglu A.A., Unlubilgin E., Aydogmus S., Keskin L., Dolen I. A prospective randomized controlled trial of the transobturator tape and tissue fixation mini-sling in patients with stress urinary incontinence: 5-year results. J Urol 2012, 188:194-199.
13. Mostafa A., Agur W., Abdel-All M., et al. A multicentre prospective randomised study of single-incision mini-sling (Ajust®) versus tension-free vaginal tape-obturator (TVT-O™) in the management of female stress urinary incontinence: pain profile and short-term outcomes. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012, 165:115-121.
14. Palomba S., Oppedisano R., Torella M., et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing three vaginal kits of single-incision mini-slings for stress urinary incontinence: surgical data. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2012, 163:108-112.
15. Bianchi-Ferraro A.M., Jarmy-Di Bella Z.I., Castro R.D., Bortolini M.A., Sartori M.G., Girão M.J. Single-incision sling compared with transobturator sling for treating stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J 2013, 24:1459-1465.
16. Kauppila A., Alavaikko P., Kujansuu E. Detrusor instability score in the evaluation of stress urinary incontinence. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1982, 61:137-141.
17. Baden W.F., Walker T.A. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1972, 15:1048-1054.
18. Ghoniem G., Stanford E., Kenton K., et al. Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2008, 19:5-33.
19. Ware J.E., Sherbourne C.D. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992, 30:473-483.
20. Kelleher C.J., Cardozo L.D., Khullar V., Salvatore S. A new questionnaire to assess the quality of life of urinary incontinent women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1997, 104:1374-1379.
21. Yalcin I., Bump R. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003, 189:98-101.
22. Rosen R., Brown C., Heiman J., et al. The female sexual function index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 2000, 26:191-208.
23. Vassiliou M.C., Feldman L.S., Andrew C.G., et al. A global assessment tool for evaluation of intraoperative laparoscopic skills. Am J Surg 2005, 190:107-113.
24. Wong D., Whaley L. Clinical Handbook of Pediatric Nursing 1986, Mosby, St Louis. 2nd ed.
25. Dindo D., Demartines N., Clavien P.A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004, 240:205-213.
26. Sung V.W., Schleinitz M.D., Rardin C.R., Ward R.M., Myers D.L. Comparison of retropubic vs. transobturator approach to midurethral slings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007, 197:3-11.
27. Richter H.E., Albo M.E., Zyczynski H.M., et al. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2010, 362:2066-2076.
28. Albo M.E., Litman H.J., Richter H.E., et al. Urinary Incontinence Treatment Network. Treatment success of retropubic and transobturator mid urethral slings at 24 months. J Urol 2012, 188:2281-2287.