Single-incision mini-sling compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: A randomized controlled trial

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 328-337

  Barber, Matthew D ^a   Weidner, Alison C ^a   Sokol, Andrew I ^b   Amundsen, Cindy L ^b   Jelovsek, J Eric ^c   Karram, Mickey M ^c   Ellerkmann, Mark ^d   Rardin, Charles R ^d   Iglesia, Cheryl B ^e   Toglia, Marc ^e  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^c CHRIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d GREATER BALTIMORE MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e Main Line Health Heart Center   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BLADDER CATHETERIZATION; BLADDER INJURY; DISEASE EXACERBATION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REOPERATION; SHAM PROCEDURE; SINGLE INCISION MINI SLING; STRESS INCONTINENCE; SUBURETHRAL SLING; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TENSION FREE VAGINAL TAPE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URODYNAMICS;

ADULT; AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONFIDENCE INTERVALS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KAPLAN-MEIER ESTIMATE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SUBURETHRAL SLINGS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY BLADDER; URINARY INCONTINENCE, STRESS; URODYNAMICS; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 84856423282     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318242a849     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Novara G, Artibani W, Barber MD, Chapple CR, Costantini E, Ficarra V, et al. Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the comparative data on colposuspensions, pubovaginal slings, and midurethral tapes in the surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol 2010;58:218-38.
2. Ogah J, Cody DJ, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women: a short version Cochrane review. Neurourol Urodynamics 2011;30:284-91.
3. Daneshgari F, Kong W, Swartz M. Complications of mid urethral slings: important outcomes for future clinical trials. J Urol 2008;180:1890-7.
4. Barber MD, Kleeman S, Karram MM, Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Vasavada S, et al. Transobturator tape compared with tension-free vaginal tape for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2008;111:611-21.
5. Richter HE, Albo ME, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2010;362:2066-76.
6. Lee KS, Lee YS, Seo JT, Na YG, Choo MS, Kim JC, et al. A prospective multicenter randomized comparative study between the U- and H-type methods of the tension-free vaginal tape SECUR procedure for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: 1-year follow-up. Eur Urol 2010;57:973-9.
7. Weber AM, Abrams P, Brubaker L, Cundiff G, Davis G, Dmochowski RR, et al. The standardization of terminology for researchers in female pelvic floor disorders. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2001;12:178-86.
8. Bump RC, Mattiasson A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JO, Klarskov P, et al. The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996;175:10-7.
9. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;187:116-26.
10. Hanley J, Capewell A, Hagen S. Validity study of the severity index, a simple measure of urinary incontinence in women. BMJ 2001;322:1096-7.
11. Barber MD, Walters MD, Bump RC. Short forms of two condition-specific quality-of-life questionnaires for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDI-20 and PFIQ-7). Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:103-13.
12. Rogers RG, Coates KW, Kammerer-Doak D, Khalsa S, Qualls C. A short form of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12). Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2003;14:164-8.
13. Neuman M. Perioperative complications and early follow-up with 100 TVT-SECUR procedures. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008;15:480-4.
14. McCarthy M Jr, Chang CH, Pickard AS, Giobbie-Hurder A, Price DD, Jonasson O, et al. Visual analog scales for assessing surgical pain. J Am Coll Surg 2005;201:245-52.
15. Yalcin I, Bump RC. Validation of two global impression questionnaires for incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;189:98-101.
16. Paraiso MF, Walters MD, Karram MM, Barber MD. Laparoscopic Burch colposuspension versus tension-free vaginal tape: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2004;104:1249-58.
17. Farrington CP, Manning G. Test statistics and sample size formulae for comparative binomial trials with null hypothesis of non-zero risk difference or non-unity relative risk. Stat Med 1990;9:1447-54.
18. Meschia M, Barbacini P, Ambrogi V, Pifarotti P, Ricci L, Spreafico L. TVT-secur: a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of primary stress urinary incontinence. One year data from a multi-centre prospective trial. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2009;20:313-7.
19. Albo ME, Richter HE, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med 2007;356:2143-55.
20. Hilton P. Trials of surgery for stress incontinence-thoughts on the “Humpty Dumpty principle.” BJOG 2002;109:1081-8.
21. FitzGerald MP, Elliott C, Brubaker L. New vs old: descriptors can affect patients' surgical preferences. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199:476e1-3.