The nuanced nature of e-print use: A case study of arXiv

Proceedings of ISSI 2013 - 14th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2013, Pages 1321-1333

  Larivière, Vincent ^a,b   Macaluso, Benoit ^a,b   Sugimoto, Cassidy R ^c   Milojević, Staša ^c   Cronin, Blaise ^c   Thelwall, Mike ^d  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^c INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGING CHARACTERISTICS; E-PRINTS; JOURNAL PUBLICATION; WEB OF SCIENCE;

ASTROPHYSICS;

PUBLISHING;

EID: 84896840464     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Brody, T., Harnad, S., & Carr, L. (2006). Earlier web usage statistics as predictors of later citation impact. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 57(8), 1060-1072.
2. Brooks, T. C. (2009). Organizing a research community with SPIRES: Where repositories, scientists and publishers meet. Information Services & Use, 29, 91-96.
3. Brown, C. (2001). The e-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 52(3), 187-200.
4. Brown, C. (2010). Communication in the sciences. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science & Technology (pp. 287-316). Medford, N. J.: Information Today.
5. Carriveau, K. L. (2008). A brief history of e-prints and the opportunities they open for science librarians. Science & Technology Libraries, 20(2-3), 73-82.
6. Confrey, E. A. (1996). The Information Exchange Groups experiment. Publishing Research Quarterly. 12(3), 37-39.
7. Davis, P. M., & Fromerth, M. J. (2007). Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles? Scientometrics, 71(2), 203-215.
8. Fowler, K. K. (2011). Mathematicians' views on current publishing issues: A survey of researchers. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 67. Retrieved from: http://www. istl. org/11-fall/refereed4. html.
9. Gentil-Beccot, A., Mele, S., & Brooks, T. C. (2009). Citing and reading behaviours in high-energy physics. How a community stopped worrying about journals and learned to love repositories. Retrieved from: http://arxiv. org/abs/0906. 5418.
10. Ginsparg, P. (2008). The global village pioneers. Learned Publishing, 21, 95-100.
11. Ginsparg, P. (2011). arXiv at 20. Nature, 476, 146-147.
12. Goldschmidt-Clermont, L. (1965). Communication patterns in high-energy physics. Retrieved from: http://testing-library. web. cern. ch/testinglibrary/Webzine/6/papers/1.
13. Haque, A.-u., & Ginsparg, P. (2009). Positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(11), 2203-2218.
14. Haque, A.-u., & Ginsparg, P. (2010). Last but not least: Additional positional effects on citation and readership in arXiv. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 61(12), 2381-2388.
15. Henneken, E. A., Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C. S., Thompson, D., Bohlen, E., Murray, S. S., Ginsparg, P., & Warner, S. (2007). E-prints and journal articles in astronomy: A productive co-existence. Learned Publishing, 20, 16-22.
16. Hey, T., & Hey, J. (2006). e-Science and its implications for the library community. Library Hi Tech, 24(4), 515-528.
17. Kling, R. (2005). The Internet and unfrefereed scholarly publishing. In B. Cronin (Ed.), Annual Review of Information Science & Technology (pp. 591-631). Medford, N. J.: Information Today.
18. Kling, R., McKim, G., & King, A. (2003). A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information & Technology, 54(1), 47-67.
19. Kling, R., Spector, L., & McKim, G. (2002). Locally controlled scholarly publishing via the Internet: The Guild model. The Journal of Electronic Publishing, 8(1). doi: http://dx. doi. org/10. 3998/3336451. 0008. 101.
20. Kling, R., Spector, L. B., & Fortuna, J. (2004). The real stakes of virtual publishing: The transformation of e-biomed into PubMed Central. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 55(2), 127-148.
21. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Henneken, E., & Murray, S. S. (2005). The effect of use and access on citations. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1395-1402.
22. Manuel, K. (2001). The place of e-prints in the publication patterns of physical scientists. Science & Technology Libraries, 20(1), 59-85.
23. Mikhailov, A. I., Chernyi, A. I., & Giliarevskii, R. (1984). Scientific communication and informatics. Arlington: Information Resources.
24. Mine, S. (2009). The roles and place of arXiv in scholarly communication. Library and Information Science, 61, 25-58.
25. Moed, H. F. (2007). The effect of 'Open Access' on citation impact: An analysis of arXiv's condensed matter section. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 58(13), 2047-2054.
26. Morris, S. (2003). Open publishing. Learned Publishing, 16, 171-176.
27. Pinfield, S. (2001). How do physicists use an e-print archive? D-Lib Magazine, 7(12).
28. Rodriguez, M. A., Bollen, J., & Van de Sompel, H. (2006). The convergence of digital libraries and the peer-review process. Journal of Information Science, 32(2), 149-159.
29. Swan, A., & Brown, S. (2003). Authors and electronic publishing: What authors want from the new technology. Learned Publishing, 16, 28-33.
30. Wilson, J. H. (1970). International high-energy physics preprint network emphasizes institutional exchange. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 21(1), 95-97.