Mathematicians' views on current publishing issues: A survey of researchers

Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship

Volumn 67, Issue , 2011, Pages 9-

  Fowler, Kristine K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84856585472     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10921206     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5062/F4QN64NM     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. American Mathematical Society. 2010. About MathSciNet [Internet]. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. [cited 2011 7/15]. Available from: http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/help/about.html
2. American Mathematical Society. 2009. Journal Price Survey [Internet]. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society. [cited 2011 7/15]. Available from: http://www.ams.org/membership/mem-journal-survey
3. arXiv. 2011. arXiv Monthly Submission Rate Statistics [Internet]. Cornell, NY: arXiv. [cited 2011 7/15]. Available from: http://arxiv.org/Stats/hcamonthly.html
4. Beschler, E. 1998. Pricing scientific publications: A commercial publisher's point of view. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 45:1333-43.
5. Birman, J.S. 2000. Scientific publishing: A Mathematician's viewpoint. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 47(7):770.
6. Burns, L., Dennis, N., Kahn, D., and Town, B. 2009. Advocacy to Benefit from Changes: Scholarly Communications Discipline-Based Advocacy Final Report Prepared For JISC Scholarly Communications Group [Internet]: Publishing Directions. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/aboutus/workinggroups/scadvocacyfinalreport.pdf
7. Carter, H., Snyder, C.A., and Imre, A. 2007. Library faculty publishing and intellectual property issues: A survey of attitudes and awareness. Portal 7(1):65-79.
8. Coonin, B. and Younce, L.M. 2010. Publishing in open access education journals: The authors' perspectives. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian 29(2):118-32.
9. Directory of Open Access Journals. 2011. [Internet]. [cited 2011 6/6]. Available from: http://www.doaj.org
10. Editors of Mathematical Reviews and Zentralblatt für Mathematik. 2010. Mathematics Subject Classification MSC2010 [Internet]. [cited 2010 11/29]. Available from: http://www.ams.org/mathscinet/msc/pdfs/classifications2010.pdf
11. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., and Probets, S. 2003a. RoMEO studies 1: The impact of copyright ownership on academic author self-archiving. Journal of Documentation 59(3):243-77.
12. Gadd, E., Oppenheim, C., and Probets, S. 2003b. RoMEO studies 2: How academics want to protect their open-access research papers. Journal of Information Science 29(5):333-56.
13. Grossman, J.W. 2005. Patterns of research in mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 52(1):35-41.
14. Harley, D., Acord, S., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., and King, C. 2010. Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines [Internet]: Center for Studies in Higher Education, UC Berkeley. Available from: http://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g
15. IMU General Assembly. 2010. Best Current Practices for Journals [Internet]: The International Mathematical Union, Committee on Electronic Information and Communication. [cited 2011 7/1]. Available from: http://www.mathunion.org/fileadmin/CEIC/bestpractice/bpfinal.pdf
16. International Mathematical Union Committee on Electronic Information and Communication. 2002. Recommendations on Information and Communication [Internet]: The International Mathematical Union, Committee on Electronic Information and Communication. Available from: http://www.mathunion.org/ceic/Publications/Recommendations/recommendations.pdf
17. Kaufman-Wills Group. 2010. Editorial Benchmark Study: Method and Tables [Internet]. Available from: http://www.kaufmanwills.com/images/kaufmanwills/PDFs/Editorial_Benchmark_Study_2009_Method_and_Tables.pdf
18. Kim, J. 2010. Faculty self-archiving: Motivations and barriers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology 61(9):1909-22.
19. King, C.J., Harley, D., Earl-Novell, S., Arter, J., Lawrence, S., and Perciali, I. 2006. Scholarly Communication: Academic Values and Sustainable Models [Internet]: Center for Studies in Higher Education (CSHE), University of California, Berkeley. Available from: http://cshe.berkeley.edu/publications/docs/scholarlycomm_report.pdf
20. Maynard, S. and O'Brien, A. 2010. Scholarly output: Print and digital in teaching and research. Journal of Documentation 66(3):384-408.
21. Morris, S. 2009. Journal authors' rights: perception and reality [Internet]. London: Publishing Research Consortium. [cited PRC Summary Paper 5.Available from: http://www.publishingresearch.net/documents/JournalAuthorsRights.pdf
22. Nicholas, D. and Rowlands, I. 2005. Open access publishing: The evidence from the authors. Journal of Academic Librarianship 31(3):179-81.
23. Rowlands, I. and Nicholas, D. 2005. Scholarly communication in the digital environment: The 2005 survey of journal author behaviour and attitudes. Aslib Proceedings 57(6):481-97.
24. Schonfeld, R.C. and Housewright, R. 2010a. Faculty Survey 2009: Key Strategic Insights for Libraries, Publishers, and Societies [Internet]: Ithaka S+R. Available from: http://www.ithaka.org/ithaka-s-r/research/faculty-surveys-2000-2009/Faculty%20Study%202009.pdf
25. Schonfeld, R.C. and Housewright, R. 2010b. Faculty survey 2009: Supplementary data. Personal communication to author, 9 December 2010.
26. Sparks, Sue. 2005. JISC Disciplinary Differences Report [Internet]. London: Rightscom Ltd. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/themes/infoenvironment/disciplinarydifferencesneeds.pdf
27. Swan, A. and Brown, S. 2005. Open Access Self-Archiving: An author study [Internet]. Truro, Cornwall: Key Perspectives. Available from: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/uploaded_documents/Open%20Access%20Self%20Archiving-an%20author%20study.pdf
28. University of California Office of Scholarly Communication and the California Digital Library eScholarship Program. 2007. Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors Regarding Scholarly Communication: Survey Findings from the University of California [Internet]: University of California Office of Scholarly Communication and the California Digital Library eScholarship Program. Available from: http://osc.universityofcalifornia.edu/responses/materials/OSC-survey-full-20070828.pdf
29. Xia, J. 2010. A longitudinal study of scholars attitudes and behaviors toward open-access journal publishing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 61(3):615-24.
30. Xia, J. 2008. A comparison of subject and institutional repositories in self-archiving practices. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 34(6):489-95.
31. Xia, J. 2007. Assessment of self-archiving in institutional repositories: Across disciplines. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 33(6):647-54.