Energy based design and analysis of staggered solvers for nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems

41st Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages

  Pipeno, Serge ^a   Farhat, Charbel ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS EST   (France)

^b University of Colorado at Boulder   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AEROELASTIC APPLICATIONS; AEROELASTIC PROBLEMS; ENERGY-BASED DESIGN; MATHEMATICAL FRAMEWORKS; NUMERICAL PROPERTIES; PARTITIONED SOLUTIONS; REALISTIC APPLICATIONS; STABILITY PROPERTIES;

AEROELASTICITY; NONLINEAR ANALYSIS; STABILITY; STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS;

PROBLEM SOLVING;

EID: 84896838030     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, Stability analysis of dynamic meshes for transient aeroelastic computations, AIAA Paper No. 93-3325, 11th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, Orlando, Florida, July 6-9, 1993.
2. C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne and N. Maman, Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution, Internat. J. Numer. Meths. Fluids, Vol. 21, pp. 807-835, 1995.
3. S. Piperno, C. Farhat and B. Larrouturou, Partitioned procedures for the transient solution of coupled aeroelastic problems-Part I: model problem, theory, and two-dimensional application, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 124, Nos. 1-2, pp. 79-112, 1995.
4. J. T. Batina, Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Paper No. 89-0115, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 9-12, 1989.
5. C. Farhat, C. Degand, B. Koobus and M. Lesoinne, Torsional springs for two-dimensional dynamic unstructured fluid meshes, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg., Vol. 163, pp. 231-245, 1998.
6. S. A. Morton, R. B. Melville, and M. R. Visbal, Accuracy and coupling issues of aeroelastic Navier-Sokes solutions of deforming meshes, AIAA Paper No. 97-1085, 38th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, Florida, April 7-10, 1997.
7. T. W. Strganac and D. T. Mook, Numerical model of unsteady subsonic aeroelastic behavior, AIAA J. 28, 903-909, 1990.
8. J. Mouro, Numerical simulation of nonlinear fluid structure interactions problems and application to hydraulic shock-absorbers, Proc. Third World Conf. Appl. Computational Fluid Dynamics, Basel World User Days CFD, May 19-23, 1996.
9. K. K. Gupta, Development of a finite element aeroelastic analysis capability, J. Aircraft 33, 995-1002, 1996.
10. E. Pramono and S. K. Weeratunga, Aeroelastic computations for wings through direct coupling on distributed-memory MIMD parallel computers, AIAA Paper No. 94-0095, 32nd Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit, Reno, January 10-13, 1994.
11. S. Piperno, Explicit/implicit fluid/structure staggered procedures with a structural predictor and fluid subcycling for 2nd invìscid aeroelastic simulations, Internat. J. Numer. Meths. Fluids 25, pp. 1207-1226, 1997.
12. M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, Geometric conservation laws for aeroelastic computations using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Paper No. 95-1709, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, California, June 19-22, 1995.
13. M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes, and their impact on aeroelastic computations, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 134, pp. 71-90, 1996.
14. C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne and P. LeTallec, Load and motion transfer algorithms for fluid/structure interaction problems with non-matching discrete interfaces: momentum and energy conservation, optimal discretization and application to aeroelas-ticity, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg., Vol. 157, pp. 95-114, 1998.
15. C. Farhat and M. Lesoinne. On the accuracy, stability, and performance of the solution of three-dimensional nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems by partitioned procedures, AIAA Paper no. 96-1388, 37th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and materials Conference, Salt lake City, Utah, April 18-19, 1996.
16. M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, A higher-order subiteration free staggered algorithm for nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems, AIAA J., Vol. 36, No. 9, pp. 1754-1756, 1998.
17. P. D. Thomas and C. K. Lombard, Geometric conservation law and its application to flow computations on moving grids, AIAA J. 17, pp. 1030-1037, 1979.
18. H. Guillard and C. Farhat, On the significance of the GCL for flow computations on moving meshes, AIAA Paper No. 99-0793, 37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 11-14, 1999.
19. C. Farhat, High performance simulation of coupled nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems, AGARD Report R-807, Special Course on Parallel Computing in CFD (l'Aérodynamique numérique et le calcul en parallèle), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), October 1995.
20. P. L. Roe, Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors and difference schemes, J. Comp. Phys. 43, pp. 357-371, 1981.
21. C. Farhat, L. Fezoui, and S. Lantéri. Two-dimensional viscous flow computations on the connection machine: unstructured meshes, upwind schemes and massively parallel computations, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 102, pp. 61-88, 1991.
22. A. Dervieux, Steady Euler simulations using unstructured meshes, Von Kármán Institute Lecture Series, 1985.
23. B. Van Leer, Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme V: a second-order sequel to godunov's method, J. Comput. Phys. 32, pp. 361-370, 1979.
24. B. N'Konga and H. Guillard, Godunov type method on non-structured meshes for three-dimensional moving boundary problems, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 113, pp. 183-204, 1994.
25. B. Koobus and C. Farhat, Second-order implicit schemes that satisfy the GCL for flow computations on dynamic grids, AIAA Paper No. 98-0113, 36th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, January 12-15, 1998.
26. B. Koobus and C. Farhat, Second-order time-accurate and geometrically conservative implicit schemes for Flow computations on unstructured dynamic meshes, Comput. Meths. Appl. Mech. Engrg. 170, pp. 103-129, 1999.
27. N. Maman and C. Farhat, Matching fluid and structure meshes for aeroelastic computations: a parallel approach, Comput. & Struc. 54, pp. 779-785, 1995.
28. R. L. Bisplinghoff, H. Ashley, and R. L. Halfman, Aeroe-lasticity, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, USA, November 1957.
29. J. C. Houbolt, A study of several aerothermoelastic problems of aircraft structures, Mitteilung aus dem Institut für Flugzeugstatik und Leichtbau 5, E. T. H., Zurich, Switzerland, 1958.
30. E. C. Yates, AGARD standard aeroelastic configuration for dynamic response, candidate configuration I.-Wing 445. 6, NASA TM-100492, 1987.
31. E. M. Lee-Rausch and J. T. Batina, Wing-flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method, AIAA Paper No. 93-1422, 1993.