Second-order time-accurate and geometrically conservative implicit schemes for flow computations on unstructured dynamic meshes

Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering

Volumn 170, Issue 1-2, 1999, Pages 103-129

  Koobus, Bruno ^a   Farhat, Charbel ^a  

^a UCB 450   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; FLUID STRUCTURE INTERACTION;

UNSTRUCTURED DYNAMIC MESHES;

FLOW OF FLUIDS;

EID: 0033076316     PISSN: 00457825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00207-2     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. [1] J. Donea, An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient fluid-structure interactions, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 33 (1982) 689-723.
2. [2] C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne and N. Maman, Mixed explicit/implicit time integration of coupled aeroelastic problems: Three-field formulation, geometric conservation and distributed solution, Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 21 (1995) 807-835.
3. [3] J.T. Batina, Unsteady Euler airfoil solutions using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Paper 89-0115, AIAA 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, January 9-12, 1989.
4. [4] M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, Geometric conservation laws for aeroelastic computations using unstructured dynamic meshes, AIAA Paper 95-1709, 12th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, San Diego, CA, June 19-22, 1995.
5. [5] M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes, and their impact on aeroelastic computations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 134 (1996) 71-90.
6. [6] P.D. Thomas and C.K. Lombard, Geometric conservation law and its application to flow computations on moving grids, AIAA J. 17 (1979) 1030-1037.
7. [7] H. Zhang, M. Reggio, J.Y. Trépanier and R. Camarero, Discrete form of the GCL for moving meshes and its implementation in CFD schemes, Comput. Fluids 22 (1993) 9-23.
8. [8] B. NKonga and H, Guillard, Godunov type method on non-structured meshes for three-dimensional moving boundary problems, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 113 (1994) 183-204.
9. [9] The First AFOSR Conference on Dynamic Motion CFD, Rutgers, June 3-5, 1996.
10. [10] S.A. Morton, R.B. Melville and M.R. Visbal, Accuracy and coupling issues of aeroelastic Navier-Stokes solutions of deforming meshes, AIAA Paper 97-1085, 38th AIAA Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Kissimmee, FL, April 7-10, 1997.
11. [11] C. Farhat, High performance simulation of coupled nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems, AGARD Report R-807, Special Course on Parallel Computing in CFD (l'Aérodynamique numérique et le calcul en parallèle), North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), October 1995.
12. [12] L. Fezoui and B. Stoufflet, A class of implicit upwind schemes for Euler simulations with unstructured meshes, J. Comput. Phys. 84 (1989) 174-206.
13. [13] C. Farhat, L. Fezoui and S. Lantéri, Two-dimensional viscous flow computations on the connection machine: unstructured meshes, upwind schemes, and massively parallel computations, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 102 (1993) 61-88.
14. [14] C. Farhat and S. Lantéri, Simulation of compressible viscous flows on a variety of MPPs: Computational algorithms for unstructured dynamic meshes and performance results, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 119 (1994) 35-60.
15. [15] B. Koobus and C. Farhat, Time-accurate algorithms for the evaluation of the viscous fluxes associated with unsteady flows and unstructured moving meshes, AIAA Paper 96-2384, 14th AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, June 18-20, 1996.
16. [16] P.L. Roe, Approximate reimann solvers, parameters vectors and difference schemes, J. Comput. Phys. 43 (1981) 357-371.
17. [17] R. Martin, Développement de méthodes de calculs efficaces pour des écoulements instationnaires en géométrie déformable, Thèse, Université de Nice-Sophia-Antipolis, Février 1996.
18. [18] E.C. Yates, AGARD standard aeroelastic configuration for dynamic response, candidate configuration I.-Wing 445.6, NASA TM-100492, 1987.
19. [19] E.M. Lee-Rausch and J. T. Batina, Wing-flutter boundary prediction using unsteady Euler aerodynamic method, AIAA Paper No. 93-1422, 1993.
20. [20] K.K. Gupta, Development of a finite element aeroelastic analysis capability, J. Aircraft 33 (1996) 995-1002.
21. [21] M. Lesoinne and C. Farhat, A higher-order subiteration free staggered algorithm for nonlinear transient aeroelastic problems, AIAA J. 36 (1998) 1754-1756.
22. [22] P.L. George, Improvement on Delaunay based 3D automatic mesh generator, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 25 (1997) 297-317.
23. [23] C. Farhat, M. Lesoinne, P. Stern and S. Lantéri, High performance solution of three-dimensional nonlinear aeroelastic problems via parallel partitioned algorithms: methodology and preliminary results, Adv. Engrg. Software 28 (1997) 43-61.
24. [24] R. Martin and H. Guillard, A second order defect correction scheme for unsteady problems, Comput. Fluids 25 (1996) 9-27.