The use of response surface methodology for modelling and analysis of water and wastewater treatment processes: A review

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 464-478

  Nair, Abhilash T ^a   Makwana, Abhipsa R ^a   Ahammed, M Mansoor ^a  

^a SARDAR VALLABHBHAI NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (India)

Author keywords

Experimental design; Optimisation; Response surface methodology (RSM); Wastewater treatment; Water treatment

Indexed keywords

DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; RECLAMATION; SURFACE PROPERTIES; WASTEWATER TREATMENT; WATER TREATMENT;

ADVANCED OXIDATION PROCESSES; COAGULATION FLOCCULATION; ELECTROCHEMICAL PROCESS; MODELLING AND ANALYSIS; OPTIMISATIONS; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; STATISTICAL TECHNIQUES; WATER AND WASTEWATER TREATMENTS;

OPTIMIZATION;

ADSORPTION; COAGULATION; ELECTROCHEMICAL METHOD; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FLOCCULATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; SEWAGE TREATMENT;

ADSORPTION; ARTICLE; BIOACCUMULATION; BIOSORPTION; DISINFECTION; ELECTROCHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELECTROCOAGULATION; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FENTON REACTION; FLOCCULATION; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; METHODOLOGY; OXIDATION; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHOD; WASTE COMPONENT REMOVAL; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT;

ADSORPTION; DISINFECTION; ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNIQUES; FLOCCULATION; MODELS, THEORETICAL; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; WATER PURIFICATION;

EID: 84896755191     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2013.733     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Abbasi, B. & Mahlooji, H. 2012 Improving response surface methodology by using artificial neural network and simulated annealing. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 3461-3468.
2. Anderson, M. & Whitcomb, P. 2007 DOE Simplified: Practical Tools for Effective Experimentation. 2nd edn, Productive Press, NY, USA.
3. Anderson-Cook, C. M., Borror, C. M. & Montgomery, D. C. 2009 Response surface design evaluation and comparison. J. Stat. Plan. Inference 139, 629-641.
4. Ankenman, B. E. & Dean, A. M. 2003 Quality improvement and robustness via design of experiments. In: Handbook of Statistics: Statistics in Industry (R. Khattree & C. R. Rao, eds), 22, Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp. 263-317.
5. Arulkumar, M., Sathishkumar, P. & Palvannan, T. 2011 Optimization of Orange G dye adsorption by activated carbon of Thespesia populnea pods using response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 186, 827-834.
6. Asgher, M., Bhatti, H. N., Bhatti, I. A. & Sheikh, M. A. 2010 Response surface methodology and central composite design of biosorption of reactive anthraquinone dyes by Citrus sinensis waste biomass. Asian J. Chem. 22, 7817-7826.
7. Ay, F., Catalkaya, E. C. & Kargi, F. 2009 A statistical experiment design approach for advanced oxidation of Direct Red azo-dye by photo-Fenton treatment. J. Hazard. Mater. 162, 230-236.
8. Basf̧, D. & Boyaci, İ.H. 2007a Modeling and optimization I: usability of response surface methodology. J. Food Eng. 78, 836-845.
9. Basf̧, D. & Boyaci, İ.H. 2007b Modeling and optimization II: comparison of estimation capabilities of response surface methodology with artificial neural networks in a biochemical reaction. J. Food Eng. 78, 846-854.
10. Bashir, M. J., Isa, M. H., Kutty, S. R., Awang, Z. B., Aziz, H. A., Mohajeri, S. & Farooqi, I. H. 2009 Landfill leachate treatment by electrochemical oxidation. Waste Manag. 29, 2534-2541.
11. Baskan, M. B. & Pala, A. 2010 A statistical experiment design approach for arsenic removal by coagulation process using aluminium sulphate. Desalination 254,42-48.
12. Bezerra, M. A., Santelli, R. E., Oliveiraa, E. P., Villar, L. S. & Escaleira, L. A. 2008 Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta 76, 965-977.
13. Box, G. E. P. & Behnken, D. W. 1960 Some new three level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2, 455-475.
14. Box, G. E. P. & Wilson, K. B. 1951 The exploration and exploitation of response surfaces: some general considerations and examples. Biometrics 10,16-60.
15. Carlson, R. & Carlson, J. E. 2005 Design and Optimization in Organic Synthesis. Elsevier, The Netherlands.
16. Chatterjee, S., Kumar, A., Basu, S. & Dutta, S. 2012 Application of response surface methodology for Methylene Blue dye removal from aqueous solution using low cost adsorbent. Chem. Eng. J. 181-182, 289-299.
17. Dora, T. K., Mohanty, Y. K., Roy, G. K. & Sarangi, B. 2013 Adsorption studies of As(III) from wastewater with a novel adsorbent in a three-phase fluidized bed by using response surface method. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 1, 150-158.
18. Fereidouni, M., Daneshi, A. & Younesi, H. 2009 Biosorption equilibria of binary Cd(II) and Ni(II) systems onto Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Ralstonia eutropha cells: application of response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 168, 1437-1448.
19. Geiger, E. O.1997 Statistical methods for fermentation optimization. In: Fermentation and Biochemical Engineering Handbook : Principles, Process Design, and Equipment (H. C. Vogel & C. L. Todaro, eds), 2nd edn, Noyes Publications, New Jersey, USA, pp. 161-180.
20. Geyikci, F., Kilic, E., Coruh, S. & Elevli, S. 2012 Modelling of lead adsorption from industrial sludge leachate on red mud by using RSM and ANN. Chem. Eng. J. 183,53-59.
21. Ghafari, S., Aziz, H. A., Hasnain, M. I. & Zinatizadeh, A. K. 2009 Application of response surface methodology (RSM) to optimize coagulation flocculation treatment of leachate using poly aluminum chloride (PAC) and alum. J. Hazard. Mater. 163, 650-656.
22. Gönena, F. & Aksu, Z. 2009 Predictive expressions of growth and Remazol Turquoise Blue-G reactive dye bioaccumulation properties of Candida utilis. Enzyme Microbial Technol. 45, 15-21.
23. Guven, G., Perendeci, A. & Tanyolac, A. 2008 Electrochemical treatment of deproteinated whey wastewater and optimization of treatment conditions with response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 157,69-78.
24. Hu, X.-J., Liu, Y.-G., Wang, H., Chen, A.-W., Zeng, G.-M., Liu, S.-M., Guo, Y.-M., Hu, X., Li, T.-T., Wang, Y.-Q., Zhou, L. & Liu, S.-H. 2013 Removal of Cu(II) ions from aqueous solution using sulfonated magnetic graphene oxide composite. Sep. Pur. Technol. 108, 189-195.
25. Im, J.-K., Kim, M.-K. & Zoh, K.-D. 2013 Optimization of photolysis of diclofenac using a response surface methodology. Water Sci. Technol. 67 (4), 907-914.
26. 4 activated rubber wood sawdust using response surface methodology (RSM). Colloids Surf. B: Biointerfaces 70,35-45.
27. Khayet, M., Cojocaru, C. & Essalhi, M. 2011a Artificial neural network modeling and response surface methodology of desalination by reverse osmosis. J. Membr. Sci. 368, 202-214.
28. Khayet, M., Zahrimb, A. Y. & Hilal, N. 2011b Modelling and optimization of coagulation of highly concentrated industrial grade leather dye by response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. J. 167,77-83.
29. Khoo, L. P. & Chen, C. H. 2001 Integration of response surface methodology with genetic algorithms. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Tech. 18, 483-489. (Pubitemid 33047751)
30. Khuri, A. I. & Cornell, J. A. 1996 Response Surface, Design and Analyses. 2nd edn, Marcel Dekker Inc., New York, USA.
31. Kim, K. J. & Lin, D. K. J. 1998 Dual response surface optimization: a fuzzy modeling approach. J. Qual. Techol. 30,1-10. (Pubitemid 128594792)
32. Korbahti, B. K. 2007 Response surface optimization of electrochemical treatment of textile dye wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 145, 277-286. (Pubitemid 46856770)
33. Kumar, R. & Pal, P. 2012 Response surface-optimized Fenton's pre-treatment for chemical precipitation of struvite and recycling of water through downstream nanofiltration. Chem. Eng. J. 210,33-44.
34. Kumar, M., Ponselvan, F. I. A., Malviya, J. R., Srivastava, V. C. & Mall, I. D. 2009 Treatment of bio-digester effluent by electrocoagulation using iron electrodes. J. Hazard. Mater. 165, 345-352.
35. Kushwaha, J. P., Srivastava, V. C. & Mall, I. D. 2010 Organics removal from dairy wastewater by electrochemical treatment and residue disposal. Sep. Pur. Technol. 76, 198-205.
36. Lan, R.-J., Li, J.-T., Sun, H.-W. & Su, W.-B. 2012 Degradation of naproxen by combination of Fenton reagent and ultrasound irradiation: optimization using response surface methodology. Water Sci. Tech. 66 (12), 2695-2701.
37. Liu, X., Li, X.-M., Yang, Q., Yue, X., Shen, T.-T., Zheng, W., Luo, K., Sun, Y.-H. & Zeng, G.-M. 2012 Landfill leachate pretreatment by coagulation-flocculation process using iron-based coagulants: optimization by response surface methodology. Chem. Eng. J. 200-202,39-51.
38. Mason, R. L., Gunst, R. F. & Hess, J. L. 2003 Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments : With Applications to Engineering and Science. 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey, USA.
39. Massart, D. L., Vandeginste, B. G. M., Buydens, L. M. C., De Jong, S., Lewi, P. J. & Smeyers-Verbeke, J. 1998 Handbook of chemometrics and qualimetrics: part A. In: Data Handlingin Science and Technology, 20A, Elsevier, The Netherlands.
40. Metcalf & Eddy Inc. 2003 Wastewater Engineering, Treatment and Reuse. 5th edn, Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited, New Delhi, India.
41. Moghaddam, S. S., Moghaddam, M. R. A. & Arami, M. 2010 Coagulation/flocculation process for dye removal using sludge from water treatment plant: optimization through response surface methodology. J. Hazard. Mater. 175, 651-657.
42. Moghaddam, S. S., Moghaddam, M. R. A. & Arami, M. 2011 Response surface optimization of acid red 119 dye from simulated wastewater using Al based waterworks sludge and polyaluminium chloride as coagulant. J. Environ. Manage. 92, 1284-1291.
43. Mohajeri, S., Aziz, H. A., Isa, M. H., Zahed, M. A. & Adlan, M. N. 2010 Statistical optimization of process parameters for landfill leachate treatment using electro-Fenton technique. J. Hazard. Mater. 176, 749-758.
44. Mondal, B., Srivastava, V. C., Kushwaha, J. P., Bhatnagar, R., Singh, S. & Mall, I. D. 2013 Parametric and multiple response optimization for the electrocchemical treatment of textile printing dye-bath effluent. Sep. Pur. Technol. 109, 135-143.
45. Montgomery, D. C. 2010 Design and Analysis of Experiments. 7th edn, Wiley India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi.
46. Moon, C., Singh, R., Chaganti, S. R. & Lalman, J. A. 2013 Modeling sulfate removal by inhibited mesophilic mixed anaerobic communities using a statistical approach. Water Res. 47, 2341-2351.
47. Myers, R. H., Montgomery, D. C. & Anderson-Cook, C. M. 2009 Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. 2nd edn, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
48. Özer, A., Gürbüz, G., Calimli, A. & Körbahti, B. K. 2009 Biosorption of copper (II) ions on Enteromorpha prolifera: application of response surface methodology (RSM). Chem. Eng. J. 146, 377-387.
49. Ray, S., Lalman, J. A. & Biswas, N. 2009 Using the Box-Benkhen technique to statistically model phenol photocatalytic degradation by titanium dioxide nanoparticles. Chem. Eng. J. 150 (1), 15-24.
50. Sakkas, V. A., Islam, M. A., Stalikas, C. & Albanis, T. A. 2010 Photocatalytic degradation using design of experiments: a review and example of the Congo red degradation. J. Hazard. Mater. 175,33-44.
51. Santos, S. C. R. & Boaventura, R. A. R. 2008 Adsorption modelling of textile dyes by sepiolite. Applied Clay Science 42, 137-145.
52. Sarabia, L. A. & Ortiz, M. C. 2009 Response surface methodology. In: Comprehensive Chemometrics: Chemical and Biochemical Data Analysis (S. D. Brown, R. Tauler & B. Walczak, eds), 1, Elsevier, The Netherlands, pp. 345-390.
53. Sarkar, M. & Majumdar, P. 2011 Application of response surface methodology for optimization of heavy metal biosorption using surfactant modified chitosan bead. Chem. Eng. J. 175, 376-387.
54. Sawyer, C. N., McCarty, P. L. & Parkin, G. F. 2003 Chemistry for Environmental Engineering and Science. 5th edn, Tata McGraw-Hill Education Private Limited, New Delhi, India.
55. Sharma, M., Kaushik, A. & Kaushik, C. P. 2011 Biosorption of reactive dye by waste biomass of Nostoc linckia. Ecological Eng. 37, 1589-1594.
56. Singh, K. P., Gupta, S., Singh, A. K. & Sinha, S. 2011 Optimizing adsorption of crystal violet dye from water by magnetic nanocomposite using response surface modeling approach. J. Hazard. Mater. 186, 1462-1473.
57. Sirés, I. & Brillas, E. 2012 Remediation of water pollution caused by pharmaceutical residues based on electrochemical separation and degradation technologies: A review. Environ Int. 40, 212-229.
58. Soloman, P. A., Bashab, C. A., Velan, M., Balasubramanian, N. & Marimuthu, P. 2009 Augmentation of biodegradability of pulp and paper industry wastewater by electrochemical pre-treatment and optimization by RSM. Sep. Pur. Technol. 69, 109-117.
59. Tony, M. A., Zhao, Y. Q., Fu, J. F. & Tayeb, A. M. 2008 Conditioning of aluminium-based water treatment sludge with Fenton's reagaent : effectiveness and optimising study to improve dewaterability. Chemosphere 72, 673-677.
60. Trinh, T. K. & Kang, L. S. 2011 Response surface methodological approach to optimize the coagulation-flocculation process in drinking water treatment. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 89, 1126-1135.
61. Tripathi, P., Srivastava, V. C. & Kumar, A. 2009 Optimization of an azo dye batch adsorption parameters using Box-Behnken design. Desalination 249, 1273-1279.
62. Umar, M., Aziz, H. A. & Yusoff, M. S. 2011 Assessing the chlorine disinfection of landfill leachate and optimization by response surface methodology (RSM). Desalination 274, 278-283.
63. Wang, T. Y. & Wu, K. B. 1999 Parameter set design procedure for the simulated annealing algorithm under the computational time constraint. Comput. Oper. Res. 26, 665-678.
64. Wang, Y., Chen, K., Moa, L., Li, J. & Xu, J. (in press) Optimization of coagulation-flocculation process for papermaking-reconstituted tobacco slice wastewater treatment using response surface methodology. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2013.04.033.
65. Wang, J.-P., Chen, Y.-Z., Wang, Y., Yuan, S.-J. & Yu, H.-Q. 2011 Optimization of the coagulation-flocculation process for pulp mill wastewater treatment using a combination of uniform design and response surface methodology. Water Res. 45,5633-5640.
66. Wu, Y., Zhou, S., Qin, F., Ye, X. & Zheng, K. 2010 Modeling physical and oxidative removal properties of Fenton process for treatment of landfill leachate using response surface methodology (RSM). J. Hazard. Mater. 180, 456-465.
67. Xiarchos, I., Jaworska, A. & Zakrzewska-Trznadel, G. 2008 Response surface methodology for the modelling of copper removal from aqueous solutions using micellar-enhanced ultrafiltration. J. Membr. Sci. 321, 222-231.
68. Xu, T., Liu, Y., Ge, F., Liu, L. & Ouyang, Y. 2013 Application of response surface methodology for optimization of azocarmine B removal by heterogeneous photo-Fenton process using hydroxy-iron-aluminum pillared bentonite. Appl. Surf. Sci. 280, 926-932.
69. Zainal-Abideen, M. Z., Aris, A., Yusof, F., Abdul-Majid, Z., Selamat, A. & Omar, S. I. 2012 Optimizing the coagulation process in a drinking water treatment plant - comparison between traditional and statistical experimental design jar tests. Water Sci. Tech. 65 (3), 496-503.
70. Zhang, H., Choi, H. J., Canazo, P. & Huang, C. P. 2009 Multivariate approach to the Fenton process for the treatment of landfill leachate. J. Hazard. Mater. 161, 1306-1312.