Response Surface Methodology

Comprehensive Chemometrics

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 345-390

  Sarabia, L A ^a   Ortiz, M C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BURGOS   (Spain)

Author keywords

Blocking; Box Behnken design; Box Cox transformation; Canonical analysis; Central composite design; Confidence region; Design of experiments; Desirability; Doehlert design; Hybrid design; Least squares regression; Model validation; Optimality criteria; Pareto optimal front; Randomization; Response surface methodology; Ridge analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84882461162     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-044452701-1.00083-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Box G.E.P., Wilson K.B. On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions. J. R. Stat. Soc. B 1951, 13:1-15.
2. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C., Vining C.G., Borror C.M., Kowalski S.M. Response Surface Methodology: A Retrospective and Literature Survey. J. Qual. Technol. 2004, 36:53-77.
3. Box G.E.P. Improving Almost Anything. Ideas and Essays 2006, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. Revised ed.
4. Ortiz M.C., Herrero A., Sanllorente S., Reguera C. The Quality of the Information Contained in Chemical Measures 2005, Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Burgos, Burgos. http://www.ubu.es/investig/grupos/cien_biotec/QA-4/index_eng.htm.
5. Sergent M., Mathieu D., Phan-Tan-Luu R., Drava G. Correct and Incorrect Use of Multilinear Regression. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995, 27:153-162.
6. Atkinson A.C., Donev A.N. Optimum Experimental Designs 1992, Clarendom Press, Oxford.
7. Morris M.D. A Class of Three-Level Experimental Designs for Response Surface Modelling. Technometrics 2000, 42:111-121.
8. Haines L.M. Evaluating the Performance of Non-Standard Designs: The San Cristobal Design. Response Surface Methodology and Related Topics 2006, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore. A.I. Khuri (Ed.).
9. Box G.E.P., Hunter J.S. Multi-Factor Experimental Designs for Exploring Response Surfaces. Ann. Math. Stat. 1957, 72:195-241.
10. Borkowski J.J. Using a Genetic Algorithm to Generate Exact Small Response Surface Designs. J. Prob. Stat. Sci. 2003, 1:65-88.
11. Haines L.M. The Application of the Annealing Algorithm to the Construction of Exact Optimal Designs for Linear Regression Models. Technometrics 2001, 29:468-477.
12. Fedorov V.V. Theory of Optimal Experiments 1972, Academic Press, New York.
13. Mathieu, D. Contribution of Experimental Design Methodology to the Study of Structure-Activity Relations. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aix-Marseille, Marseille, 1981.
14. Mitchell T.J. An Algorithm for the Construction of D-Optimal Experimental Designs. Technometrics 1971, 13:731-742.
15. Wynn H.P. The Sequential Generation of D-Optimum Experimental Designs. Ann. Math. Stat. 1970, 41:1644-1664.
16. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology. Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 2nd ed.
17. Khuri A.I. A Measure of Rotatability for Response Surface Designs. Technometrics 1988, 30:95-104.
18. Draper N.R., Pukelsheim F. Another Look at Rotatability. Technometrics 1990, 32:195-202.
19. Park S.H., Lim J.H., Baba Y. A Measure of Rotatability for 2nd-Order Response Surface Designs. Ann Inst. Stat. Math. 1993, 45:655-664.
20. Zahran A., Anderson-Cook C.M., Myers R.H. Fraction of Design Space to Assess Prediction Capability of Response Surface Designs. J. Qual. Technol. 2003, 35:377-386.
21. Borkowski J.J. Graphical Methods for Assessing the Prediction Capability of Response Surface Designs. Response Surface Methodology and Related Topics 2006, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore. A.I. Khuri (Ed.).
22. Box G.E.P., Draper N.R. Empirical Model-Building and Response Surfaces 1987, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
23. Box G.E.P., Draper N.R. A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface Design. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1963, 54:622-654.
24. Draper N.R., Smith H. Applied Regression Analysis 1998, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
25. Belsley D.A. Conditioning Diagnostics, Collinearity and Weak Data in Regression 1991, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
26. Cook R.D., Weisberg S. Residuals and Influence in Regression 1982, Chapman & Hall, London.
27. Rousseeuw P.J., Leroy A.M. Robust Regression & Outliers Detection 2001, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ. 2nd ed.
28. Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L., Herrero A. Robust Regression Techniques. A Useful Alternative for the Detection of Outlier Data in Chemical Analysis. Talanta 2006, 70:499-512.
29. Mathieu D., Phan-Tan-Luu R. Approche méthodologique des surfaces de réponse. Plans dexpérience 1997, Technip, Paris. J.J. Droebeke, J. Fine, G. Saporta (Eds.).
30. Doehlert D.H. Uniform Shell Designs. Appl. Stat. 1970, 19:231-239.
31. Doehlert D.H., Klee V.L. Experimental Designs through Level Reduction of a D-Dimensional Cuboctahedron. Discrete Math. 1972, 2:309-334.
32. Feneuille D., Mathieu D., Phan-Tan-Luu R. Méthodologie de la recherche expérimentale 1978, Université d'Aix-Marseille III. Publications du LMRE, Marseille.
33. Lewis G.A., Mathieu D., Phan-Tan-Luu R. Pharmaceutical Experimental Design 1999, Marcel Dekker, New York.
34. Box G.E.P., Behnken D.W. Some New Three Level Designs for the Study of Quantitative Variables. Technometrics 1960, 2:455-475.
35. Roquemore K.G. Hybrid Designs for Quadratic Response Surfaces. Technometrics 1976, 18:419-424.
36. Franquart, P. Multicriteria Optimization and Methodology of Experimental Research. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aix-Marseille III, Marseille, 1992.
37. Peissik, A. Properties and Characteristics of Experimental Design Matrices for Second Degree Polynomial Models. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aix-Marseille III, Marseille, 1995.
38. Rueda E., Sarabia L.A., Herrero A., Ortiz M.C. Optimisation Using a Surface Response Methodology of a System with Drift. Application to a Flow Analysis System with Electrochemical Detection. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 498:119-127.
39. Arroyo D., Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L.A. Multiresponse Optimization and Parallel Factor Analysis, Useful Tools in the Determination of Estrogens by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry. J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1157:358-368.
40. Trinca L.A., Gilmour S.G. An Algorithm for Arranging Response Surface Designs in Small Blocks. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 2000, 33:25-43.
41. Hoerl A.E. Optimum Solution to Many Variables Equations. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1959, 55:69-78.
42. Hoerl A.E. Ridge Analysis. Chem. Eng. Prog. 1964, 60:67-77.
43. Draper N.R. Ridge Analysis of Response Surfaces. Technometrics 1963, 5:469-479.
44. Rueda E., Sarabia L.A., Herrero A., Ortiz M.C. Optimisation of a Flow Injection System with Electrochemical Detection using the Desirability Function. Application to the Determination of Hydroquinone in Cosmetics. Anal. Chim. Acta 2003, 479:173-184.
45. Gilmour S.G., Draper N.R. Confidence Regions around the Ridge of Optimal Response on Fitted Second-Order Response Surfaces. Technometrics 2003, 45:333-339.
46. Lin D.K.J., Peterson J.J. Statistical Inference for Response Surface Optima. Response Surface Methodology and Related Topics 2006, World Scientific, Singapore. A.I. Khuri (Ed.).
47. Hill W.J., Hunter W.G. A Review of Response Surface Methodology: A Literature Survey. Technometrics 1966, 8:571-590.
48. Deb K. Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms 2001, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
49. Steuer R.E. Multiple Criteria Optimization: Theory, Computation and Application 1986, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
50. Blachut J., Eschenauer H.A. Emerging Methods for Multidisciplinary Optimization 2001, Springer-Verlag, Wien.
51. Khuri A.I., Valeroso E.S. Optimization Methods in Multiresponse Methodology. Statistical Process Monitoring and Optimization 2000, Marcel Dekker, New York. S.H. Park, G.G. Vining (Eds.).
52. Floros J.D., Chinnan M.S. Computer Graphics-Assisted Optimizations for Product and Process Development. Food Technol. 1988, 42:72-78.
53. Derringer G., Suich R. Simultaneous Optimization of Several Response Variables. J. Qual. Technol. 1980, 12:214-219.
54. Ortiz M.C., Sarabia L., Herrero A., Sánchez M.S. Vectorial Optimization as a Methodological Alternative to Desirability Function. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2006, 83:157-168.
55. Box G.E.P., Cox D.R. An Analysis of Transformations. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 1964, 26:211-243.
56. Atkinson A.C. Generalized Linear Models and Response Transformation. Response Surface Methodology and Related Topics 2006, World Scientific Publishing, Singapore. A.I. Khuri (Ed.).
57. Box G.E.P., Hunter J.S. A Confidence Region for the Solution of a Set of Simultaneous Equations with an Application to Experimental Design. Biometrika 1954, 41:190-199.
58. del Castillo E., Cahya S. A Tool for Computing Confidence Regions on the Stationary Point of a Response Surface. Am. Stat. 2001, 55:358-365.
59. Peterson J.J., Cahya S., del Castillo E. A General Approach to Confidence Regions for Optimal Factor Levels of Response Surfaces. Biometrics 2002, 58:422-431.