Phylogenetic Gaussian Process Model for the Inference of Functionally Important Regions in Protein Tertiary Structures

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Huang, Yi Fei ^a   Golding, G Brian ^a  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GAUSSIAN DISTRIBUTION; GAUSSIAN NOISE (ELECTRONIC); MAMMALS; PROTEINS; SITE SELECTION;

ACID SITE; AMINO-ACIDS; CRITICAL QUESTIONS; GAUSSIAN PROCESS MODELS; GAUSSIAN PROCESSES; PHYLOGENETICS; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURES; SITE-SPECIFIC; SPATIAL CORRELATIONS; SUBSTITUTION RATES;

PHYLOGENETIC;

ACCURACY; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE CLUSTER; GENETIC CONSERVATION; KERNEL METHOD; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MUTAGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE;

ALGORITHMS; ANTIGENS, CD80; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; PROTEINS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROC CURVE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84896712150     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003429     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Kumar S, Dudley JT, Filipski A, Liu L, (2011) Phylomedicine: an evolutionary telescope to explore and diagnose the universe of disease mutations. Trends in Genetics 27: 377-386.
2. Lichtarge O, Bourne HR, Cohen FE, (1996) An evolutionary trace method defines binding surfaces common to protein families. Journal of Molecular Biology 257: 342-358.
3. Dean A, Golding G, (2000) Enzyme evolution explained (sort of). Pacific Symposium on Biocom-puting 2000: 6-17.
4. Madabushi S, Yao H, Marsh M, Kristensen DM, Philippi A, et al. (2002) Structural clusters of evolutionary trace residues are statistically significant and common in proteins. Journal of Molecular Biology 316: 139-154.
5. Simon AL, Stone EA, Sidow A, (2002) Inference of functional regions in proteins by quantification of evolutionary constraints. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 99: 2912-2917.
6. Innis C, Anand A, Sowdhamini R, (2004) Prediction of functional sites in proteins using conserved functional group analysis. Journal of Molecular Biology 337: 1053-1068.
7. Mayrose I, Graur D, Ben-Tal N, Pupko T, (2004) Comparison of site-specific rate-inference methods for protein sequences: Empirical bayesian methods are superior. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 1781-1791.
8. Nimrod G, Glaser F, Steinberg D, Ben-Tal N, Pupko T, (2005) In silico identification of functional regions in proteins. Bioinformatics 21: i328-i337.
9. Capra JA, Singh M, (2007) Predicting functionally important residues from sequence conservation. Bioinformatics 23: 1875-1882.
10. Goldenberg O, Erez E, Nimrod G, Ben-Tal N, (2009) The ConSurf-DB: pre-calculated evolutionary conservation profiles of protein structures. Nucleic Acids Research 37: D323-D327.
11. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N, (2010) ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Research 38: W529-W533.
12. Suzuki Y, (2004) Three-dimensional window analysis for detecting positive selection at structural regions of proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution 21: 2352-2359.
13. Berglund AC, Wallner B, Elofsson A, Liberles DA, (2005) Tertiary windowing to detect positive diversifying selection. Journal of Molecular Evolution 60: 499-504.
14. Liang H, Zhou W, Landweber LF, (2006) SWAKK: a web server for detecting positive selection in proteins using a sliding window substitution rate analysis. Nucleic Acids Research 34: W382-W384.
15. Tusche C, Steinbruck L, McHardy AC, (2012) Detecting patches of protein sites of influenza a viruses under positive selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 29: 2063-2071.
16. Watabe T, Kishino H, (2013) Spatial distribution of selection pressure on a protein based on the hierarchical bayesian model. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30 (12):: 2714-22.
17. Huang YF, Golding GB, (2012) Inferring sequence regions under functional divergence in duplicate genes. Bioinformatics 28: 176-183.
18. Zhang Z, Townsend JP, (2009) Maximum-likelihood model averaging to profile clustering of site types across discrete linear sequences. PLoS Computational Biology 5: e1000421.
19. Lartillot N, Philippe H, (2006) Computing Bayes factors using thermodynamic integration. Sys-tematic Biology 55: 195-207.
20. Banerjee S, Carlin BP, Gelfand AE (2004) Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 1 edition.
21. Rasmussen CE, Williams CKI (2005) Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. The MIT Press, 1 edition.
22. Felsenstein J, (1981) Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368-376.
23. Metropolis N, Rosenbluth A, Rosenbluth M, Teller A, Teller E, (1953) Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics 21: 1087-1092.
24. Hastings WK, (1970) Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57: 97-109.
25. Yang Z, (1994) Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. Journal of Molecular Evolution 39: 306-314.
26. Jones DT, Taylor WR, Thornton JM, (1992) The rapid generation of mutation data matrices from protein sequences. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 8: 275-282.
27. Kosiol C, Goldman N, (2005) Different versions of the Dayhoff rate matrix. Molecular Biology and Evolution 22: 193-199.
28. Dutheil J, Gaillard S, Bazin E, Glemin S, Ranwez V, et al. (2006) Bio++: a set of C++ libraries for sequence analysis, phylogenetics, molecular evolution and population genetics. BMC Bioinformatics 7: 188.
29. Gueguen L, Gaillard S, Boussau B, Gouy M, Groussin M, et al. (2013) Bio++: Efficient extensible libraries and tools for computational molecular evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 1745-1750.
30. Sing T, Sander O, Beerenwinkel N, Lengauer T, (2005) ROCR: visualizing classifier performance in R. Bioinformatics 21: 3940-3941.
31. Glaser F, Pupko T, Paz I, Bell RE, Bechor-Shental D, et al. (2003) ConSurf: Identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information. Bioinformatics 19: 163-164.
32. Muchmore SW, Sattler M, Liang H, Meadows RP, Harlan JE, et al. (1996) X-ray and NMR structure of human Bcl-xL, an inhibitor of programmed cell death. Nature 381: 335-341.
33. Collins M, Ling V, Carreno B, (2005) The B7 family of immune-regulatory ligands. Genome Biology 6: 223.
34. Ikemizu S, Gilbert RJ, Fennelly JA, Collins AV, Harlos K, et al. (2000) Structure and dimerization of a soluble form of B7-1. Immunity 12: 51-60.
35. Stamper CC, Zhang Y, Tobin JF, Erbe DV, Ikemizu S, et al. (2001) Crystal structure of the B7-1/CTLA-4 complex that inhibits human immune responses. Nature 410: 608-611.
36. Sayers EW, Barrett T, Benson DA, Bolton E, Bryant SH, et al. (2012) Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Research 40: D13-D25.
37. Guindon S, Gascuel O, (2003) A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696-704.
38. Peach RJ, Bajorath J, Naemura J, Leytze G, Greene J, et al. (1995) Both extracellular immunoglobin-like domains of cd80 contain residues critical for binding t cell surface receptors CTLA-4 and CD28. Journal of Biological Chemistry 270: 21181-21187.
39. Yokoyama S, Tada T, Zhang H, Britt L, (2008) Elucidation of phenotypic adaptations: Molecular analyses of dim-light vision proteins in vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 13480-13485.
40. Vanhatalo J, Vehtari A, (2007) Sparse log Gaussian processes via MCMC for spatial epidemiology. Journal of Machine Learning Research- Proceedings Track 1: 73-89.
41. Robinson DM, Jones DT, Kishino H, Goldman N, Thorne JL, (2003) Protein evolution with depen- dence among codons due to tertiary structure. Molecular Biology and Evolution 20: 1692-1704.
42. Rodrigue N, Lartillot N, Bryant D, Philippe H, (2005) Site interdependence attributed to tertiary structure in amino acid sequence evolution. Gene 347: 207-217.
43. Rodrigue N, Philippe H, Lartillot N, (2006) Assessing site-interdependent phylogenetic models of sequence evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 1762-1775.
44. Conant GC, Stadler PF, (2009) Solvent exposure imparts similar selective pressures across a range of yeast proteins. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 1155-1161.
45. Meyer AG, Wilke CO, (2013) Integrating sequence variation and protein structure to identify sites under selection. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 36-44.
46. Meyer AG, Dawson ET, Wilke CO, (2013) Cross-species comparison of site-specific evolutionary-rate variation in influenza haemagglutinin. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368: 20120334.
47. Siepel A, Haussler D, (2004) Combining phylogenetic and hidden markov models in biosequence analysis. Journal of Computational Biology 11: 413-428.
48. Yang Z, (1995) A space-time process model for the evolution of DNA sequences. Genetics 139: 993-1005.
49. Felsenstein J, Churchill GA, (1996) A hidden Markov model approach to variation among sites in rate of evolution. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 93-104.
50. Siepel A, Bejerano G, Pedersen JS, Hinrichs AS, Hou M, et al. (2005) Evolutionarily conserved elements in vertebrate, insect, worm, and yeast genomes. Genome Research 15: 1034-1050.
51. Siepel A, Pollard K, Haussler D, (2006) New methods for detecting lineage-specific selection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3909: 190-205.
52. Mayrose I, Doron-Faigenboim A, Bacharach E, Pupko T, (2007) Towards realistic codon models: among site variability and dependency of synonymous and non-synonymous rates. Bioinformatics 23: i319-i327.
53. De Maio N, Holmes I, Schltterer C, Kosiol C, (2013) Estimating empirical codon hidden markov models. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 725-736.
54. Yang Z, (2007) PAML 4: Phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Molecular Biology and Evolution 24: 1586-1591.
55. Huelsenbeck JP, Suchard MA, (2007) A nonparametric method for accommodating and testing across-site rate variation. Systematic Biology 56: 975-987.
56. Neal R (1997) Monte Carlo implementation of Gaussian process models for Bayesian regression and classification. Technical report, University of Toronto.
57. Press W, Teukolsky S, Vetterling W, Flannery B (1992) Numerical Recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.
58. Neal R, (1999) Regression and classification using Gaussian process priors. Bayesian Statistics 6: 475-501.
59. Jmol: an open-source Java viewer for chemical structures in 3D. http://www.jmol.org/.